Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "crypto: algif_hash - avoid zero-sized array" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Mar 28, 2017

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

crypto: algif_hash - avoid zero-sized array

to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
crypto-algif_hash-avoid-zero-sized-array.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 6207119444595d287b1e9e83a2066c17209698f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:31:01 +0100
Subject: crypto: algif_hash - avoid zero-sized array

From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>

commit 6207119444595d287b1e9e83a2066c17209698f3 upstream.

With this reproducer:

  struct sockaddr_alg alg = {
          .salg_family = 0x26,
          .salg_type = "hash",
          .salg_feat = 0xf,
          .salg_mask = 0x5,
          .salg_name = "digest_null",

};
int sock, sock2;

  sock = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
  bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&alg, sizeof(alg));
  sock2 = accept(sock, NULL, NULL);
  setsockopt(sock, SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY, "\x9b\xca", 2);
  accept(sock2, NULL, NULL);

==== 8< ======== 8< ======== 8< ======== 8< ====

one can immediatelly see an UBSAN warning:

UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in crypto/algif_hash.c:187:7
variable length array bound value 0 <= 0
CPU: 0 PID: 15949 Comm: syz-executor Tainted: G            E      4.4.30-0-default #1
...
Call Trace:

...
[<ffffffff81d598fd>] ? __ubsan_handle_vla_bound_not_positive+0x13d/0x188 [<ffffffff81d597c0>] ? __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x1bc/0x1bc [<ffffffffa0e2204d>] ? hash_accept+0x5bd/0x7d0 [algif_hash] [<ffffffffa0e2293f>] ? hash_accept_nokey+0x3f/0x51 [algif_hash] [<ffffffffa0e206b0>] ? hash_accept_parent_nokey+0x4a0/0x4a0 [algif_hash] [<ffffffff8235c42b>] ? SyS_accept+0x2b/0x40

It is a correct warning, as hash state is propagated to accept as zero, but creating a zero-length variable array is not allowed in C.

Fix this as proposed by Herbert -- do "?: 1" on that site. No sizeof or similar happens in the code there, so we just allocate one byte even though we do not use the array.

Cc Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Cc "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> (maintainer:CRYPTO API)
Cc Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
 crypto/algif_hash.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
crypto/algif_hash.c +1 -1
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int hash_accept(struct socket *so
 	struct alg_sock *ask = alg_sk(sk);
 	struct hash_ctx *ctx = ask->private;
 	struct ahash_request *req = &ctx->req;
-	char state[crypto_ahash_statesize(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req))];
+	char state[crypto_ahash_statesize(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req)) ? : 1];
 	struct sock *sk2;
 	struct alg_sock *ask2;
 	struct hash_ctx *ctx2;

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.10/crypto-algif_hash-avoid-zero-sized-array.patch