Patch "cpufreq: Bring CPUs up even if cpufreq_online() failed" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: Bring CPUs up even if cpufreq_online() failed
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-bring-cpus-up-even-if-cpufreq_online-failed.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
c4a3fa261b16858416f1fd7db03a33d7ef5fc0b3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Yu <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 13:45:16 +0800
Subject: cpufreq: Bring CPUs up even if cpufreq_online() failed
From: Chen Yu <[email protected]>
commit c4a3fa261b16858416f1fd7db03a33d7ef5fc0b3 upstream.
There is a report that after commit 27622b061eb4 ("cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine"), the normal CPU offline/online cycle fails on some platforms.
According to the ftrace result, this problem was triggered on platforms using acpi-cpufreq as the default cpufreq driver, and due to the lack of some ACPI freq method (eg. _PCT), cpufreq_online() failed and returned a negative value, so the CPU hotplug state machine rolled back the CPU online process. Actually, from the user's perspective, the failure of cpufreq_online() should not prevent that CPU from being brought up, although cpufreq might not work on that CPU.
BTW, during system startup cpufreq_online() is not invoked via CPU online but by the cpufreq device creation process, so the APs can be brought up even though cpufreq_online() fails in that stage.
This patch ignores the return value of cpufreq_online/offline() and lets the cpufreq framework deal with the failure. cpufreq_online() itself will do a proper rollback in that case and if _PCT is missing, the ACPI cpufreq driver will print a warning if the corresponding debug options have been enabled.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194581
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +16 -2
@@ -2405,6 +2405,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled)*********************************************************************/ static enum cpuhp_state hp_online; +static int cpuhp_cpufreq_online (unsigned int cpu) +{ +cpufreq_online (cpu); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int cpuhp_cpufreq_offline (unsigned int cpu) +{ +cpufreq_offline (cpu); + +return 0 ; +} +/** * cpufreq_register_driver - register a CPU Frequency driver * @driver_data: A struct cpufreq_driver containing the values#
@@ -2467,8 +2481,8 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufr } ret =cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls (CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN ,"cpufreq:online" , - cpufreq_online, - cpufreq_offline); + cpuhp_cpufreq_online, + cpuhp_cpufreq_offline);if (ret <0 ) goto err_if_unreg; hp_online = ret;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.10/cpufreq-bring-cpus-up-even-if-cpufreq_online-failed.patch