Staging : rts5208 : checkpatch.pl fixes
PATCH 1/1 Staging : rts5208 : checkpatch.pl fixes
Fixed some issues reported by checkpatch.pl script.
--- drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 14 ++++++++++---- drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c | 11 +++++++---- drivers/staging/rts5208/xd.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +1 -1
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) {struct rtsx_dev *dev =pci_get_drvdata (pci); -dev_info (&pci->dev,"rtsx_remove() called\n" ); +dev_info (&pci->dev,"%s called\n" ,"rtsx_remove()" );quiesce_and_remove_host (dev);release_everything (dev);
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +4 -2
@@ -616,8 +616,10 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip) else retval =rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_new (chip); -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n" , - (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset)); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s = 0x%x (%s)\n" , +"chip->need_reset" , + (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset), +"rtsx_reset_chip" );#else /* HW_AUTO_SWITCH_SD_BUS */ retval =rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_old (chip);#endif /* HW_AUTO_SWITCH_SD_BUS */
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c +10 -4
@@ -910,8 +910,12 @@ static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir)int retval;bool ddr_rx = false; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"sd_change_phase (sample_point = %d, tune_dir = %d)\n" , - sample_point, tune_dir); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s (%s = %d, %s = %d)\n" , +"sd_change_phase" , +"sample_point" , + sample_point, +"tune_dir" , + tune_dir);if (tune_dir ==TUNE_RX ) {SD_VP_CTL =SD_VPRX_CTL ;
@@ -3575,8 +3579,10 @@ static int reset_mmc_only(struct rtsx_chip *chip)return STATUS_FAIL ; } -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"In reset_mmc_only, sd_card->sd_type = 0x%x\n" , - sd_card->sd_type); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"In %s, %s = 0x%x\n" , +"reset_mmc_only" , +"sd_card->sd_type" , + sd_card->sd_type);return STATUS_SUCCESS ; }
drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c +7 -4
@@ -520,8 +520,8 @@ int spi_get_status(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip) {struct spi_info *spi = &chip->spi; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"spi_get_status: err_code = 0x%x\n" , - spi->err_code); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s: err_code = 0x%x\n" , +"spi_get_status" , spi->err_code);rtsx_stor_set_xfer_buf (&spi->err_code,min_t (int,scsi_bufflen (srb),1 ), srb);scsi_set_resid (srb,scsi_bufflen (srb) -1 );
@@ -543,8 +543,11 @@ int spi_set_parameter(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip) spi->clk_div = ((u16)(srb->cmnd[4 ]) <<8 ) | srb->cmnd[5 ]; spi->write_en = srb->cmnd[6 ]; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"spi_set_parameter: spi_clock = %d, clk_div = %d, write_en = %d\n" , - spi->spi_clock, spi->clk_div, spi->write_en); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s: spi_clock = %d, clk_div = %d, write_en = %d\n" , +"spi_set_parameter" , + spi->spi_clock, + spi->clk_div, + spi->write_en);return STATUS_SUCCESS ; }
drivers/staging/rts5208/xd.c +15 -11
@@ -885,8 +885,9 @@ static int xd_init_l2p_tbl(struct rtsx_chip *chip)struct xd_info *xd_card = &chip->xd_card;int size, i; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"xd_init_l2p_tbl: zone_cnt = %d\n" , - xd_card->zone_cnt); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s: zone_cnt = %d\n" , +"xd_init_l2p_tbl" , + xd_card->zone_cnt);if (xd_card->zone_cnt <1 ) {rtsx_trace (chip);
@@ -1026,7 +1027,8 @@ static u32 xd_get_l2p_tbl(struct rtsx_chip *chip, int zone_no, u16 log_off)#ifdef XD_DELAY_WRITE retval =xd_delay_write (chip);if (retval !=STATUS_SUCCESS ) { -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"In xd_get_l2p_tbl, delay write fail!\n" ); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"In %s, delay write fail!\n" , +"xd_get_l2p_tbl" );return BLK_NOT_FOUND ; }#endif
@@ -1434,7 +1436,7 @@ static int xd_build_l2p_tbl(struct rtsx_chip *chip, int zone_no)u16 cur_lst_page_logoff, ent_lst_page_logoff;u8 redunt[11 ]; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"xd_build_l2p_tbl: %d\n" , zone_no); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s: %d\n" ,"xd_build_l2p_tbl" , zone_no);if (!xd_card->zone) { retval =xd_init_l2p_tbl (chip);
@@ -1901,7 +1903,9 @@ static int xd_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u32 old_blk, retval =rtsx_transfer_data_partial (chip,XD_CARD , buf, page_cnt *512 ,scsi_sg_count (chip->srb), - index, offset,DMA_TO_DEVICE , chip->xd_timeout); + index, offset, +DMA_TO_DEVICE , + chip->xd_timeout);if (retval <0 ) {rtsx_clear_xd_error (chip);
@@ -1960,7 +1964,7 @@ int xd_delay_write(struct rtsx_chip *chip)int retval;if (delay_write->delay_write_flag) { -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"xd_delay_write\n" ); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s\n" ,"xd_delay_write" ); retval =xd_switch_clock (chip);if (retval !=STATUS_SUCCESS ) {rtsx_trace (chip);
@@ -2049,7 +2053,7 @@ int xd_rw(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip, start_page);if (retval !=STATUS_SUCCESS ) {set_sense_type (chip, lun, -SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_WRITE_ERR ); +SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_WRITE_ERR );rtsx_trace (chip);return STATUS_FAIL ; }
@@ -2087,7 +2091,7 @@ int xd_rw(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip,if (detect_card_cd (chip,XD_CARD ) !=STATUS_SUCCESS ) {set_sense_type (chip, lun, -SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_NOT_PRESENT ); +SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_NOT_PRESENT );rtsx_trace (chip);return STATUS_FAIL ; }
@@ -2147,7 +2151,7 @@ int xd_rw(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip, ptr, &index, &offset);if (retval !=STATUS_SUCCESS ) {set_sense_type (chip, lun, -SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_UNRECOVER_READ_ERR ); +SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_UNRECOVER_READ_ERR );rtsx_trace (chip);return STATUS_FAIL ; }
@@ -2190,10 +2194,10 @@ int xd_rw(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip,if (old_blk ==BLK_NOT_FOUND ) {if (srb->sc_data_direction ==DMA_FROM_DEVICE )set_sense_type (chip, lun, -SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_UNRECOVER_READ_ERR ); +SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_UNRECOVER_READ_ERR );else set_sense_type (chip, lun, -SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_WRITE_ERR ); +SENSE_TYPE_MEDIA_WRITE_ERR );rtsx_trace (chip);return STATUS_FAIL ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Quoted 1 line · Simo Koskinen
Fixed some issues reported by checkpatch.pl script.
[]
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) · line 1012
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +1
-1@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) {struct rtsx_dev *dev =pci_get_drvdata (pci); -dev_info (&pci->dev,"rtsx_remove() called\n" ); +dev_info (&pci->dev,"%s called\n" ,"rtsx_remove()" );
This would be better as dev_dbg
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +0
-0quiesce_and_remove_host (dev);release_everything (dev);drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +0
-0
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip) · line 622
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +4
-2@@ -616,8 +616,10 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)else retval =rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_new (chip); -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n" , - (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset)); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s = 0x%x (%s)\n" , +"chip->need_reset" , + (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset), +"rtsx_reset_chip" );
This and other changes that take part of the format and convert them to '"%s", substrings' are not good. checkpatch doesn't emit a warning for long formats.
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
Quoted 1 line
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c +0
-0
[]
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir) · line 918
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c +6
-2@@ -910,8 +910,12 @@ static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir)int retval;bool ddr_rx = false; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"sd_change_phase (sample_point = %d, tune_dir = %d)\n" , - sample_point, tune_dir); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s (%s = %d, %s = %d)\n" , +"sd_change_phase" , +"sample_point" , + sample_point, +"tune_dir" , + tune_dir);
etc.
Quoted 11 lines · Joe Perches
Quoted 1 line · Simo Koskinen
Fixed some issues reported by checkpatch.pl script.
[]
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +0
-0@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) {struct rtsx_dev *dev =pci_get_drvdata (pci);
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) · line 1012
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +1
-1-dev_info (&pci->dev,"rtsx_remove() called\n" ); +dev_info (&pci->dev,"%s called\n" ,"rtsx_remove()" );This would be better as
dev_dbg
True, I can change that...
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +0
-0quiesce_and_remove_host (dev);release_everything (dev);drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +0
-0@@ -616,8 +616,10 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)else retval =rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_new (chip);
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip) · line 622
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +4
-2-dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n" , - (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset)); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s = 0x%x (%s)\n" , +"chip->need_reset" , + (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset), +"rtsx_reset_chip" );This and other changes that take part of the format and convert them to '"%s", substrings' are not good. checkpatch doesn't emit a warning for long formats.
The reason for changes were the following warning when run the checkpatch.pl script:
WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'rtsx_reset_chip', this function's name, in a string
#619: FILE: rtsx_chip.c:619:
+ dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n",
So it's not a good idea to fix these warnings?
Quoted 54 lines · Joe Perches
Quoted 1 line · Simo Koskinen
Fixed some issues reported by checkpatch.pl script.
[]
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) · line 1012
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +1
-1@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) {struct rtsx_dev *dev =pci_get_drvdata (pci); -dev_info (&pci->dev,"rtsx_remove() called\n" ); +dev_info (&pci->dev,"%s called\n" ,"rtsx_remove()" );This would be better as
dev_dbgQuoted 8 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +0
-0quiesce_and_remove_host (dev);release_everything (dev);drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +0
-0drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip) · line 622
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +4
-2@@ -616,8 +616,10 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)else retval =rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_new (chip); -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n" , - (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset)); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s = 0x%x (%s)\n" , +"chip->need_reset" , + (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset), +"rtsx_reset_chip" );This and other changes that take part of the format and convert them to '"%s", substrings' are not good. checkpatch doesn't emit a warning for long formats.
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
Quoted 1 line
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c +0
-0[]
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir) · line 918
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c +6
-2@@ -910,8 +910,12 @@ static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir)int retval;bool ddr_rx = false; -dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"sd_change_phase (sample_point = %d, tune_dir = %d)\n" , - sample_point, tune_dir); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s (%s = %d, %s = %d)\n" , +"sd_change_phase" , +"sample_point" , + sample_point, +"tune_dir" , + tune_dir);etc.
Quoted 43 lines · Simo Koskinen
Quoted 11 lines · Joe Perches
Quoted 1 line · Simo Koskinen
Fixed some issues reported by checkpatch.pl script.
[]
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +0
-0@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) {struct rtsx_dev *dev =pci_get_drvdata (pci);Quoted 4 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c static void rtsx_remove(struct pci_dev *pci) · line 1012
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +1
-1-dev_info (&pci->dev,"rtsx_remove() called\n" ); +dev_info (&pci->dev,"%s called\n" ,"rtsx_remove()" );This would be better as
dev_dbgTrue, I can change that...
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c +0
-0quiesce_and_remove_host (dev);release_everything (dev);drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +0
-0@@ -616,8 +616,10 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)else retval =rtsx_pre_handle_sdio_new (chip);Quoted 10 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip) · line 622
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c +4
-2-dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"chip->need_reset = 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n" , - (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset)); +dev_dbg (rtsx_dev (chip),"%s = 0x%x (%s)\n" , +"chip->need_reset" , + (unsigned int )(chip->need_reset), +"rtsx_reset_chip" );This and other changes that take part of the format and convert them to '"%s", substrings' are not good. checkpatch doesn't emit a warning for long formats.
The reason for changes were the following warning when run the checkpatch.pl script:
Quoted 6 lines
WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...",
__func__' to using 'rtsx_reset_chip', this function's name, in a string
#619: FILE: rtsx_chip.c:619:
+ dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "chip->need_reset= 0x%x (rtsx_reset_chip)\n",So it's not a good idea to fix these warnings?
The warning suggests you change this to
dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "chip->need_reset = 0x%x (%s)\n", (unsigned int)(chip->need_reset), __func__);
It doesn't mention the chip->need_reset part. The reason is simply that when the function name changes, this doesn't have to be updated. That same reasoning doesn't hold up for when something changes in "chip->need_reset".
Frans