Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "ipv6: Do not leak throw route references" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jun 29, 2017

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

ipv6: Do not leak throw route references

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
ipv6-do-not-leak-throw-route-references.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From foo@baz Thu Jun 29 19:38:17 CEST 2017

From: Serhey Popovych <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:29:25 +0300
Subject: ipv6: Do not leak throw route references

From: Serhey Popovych <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 07f615574f8ac499875b21c1142f26308234a92c ]

While commit 73ba57bfae4a ("ipv6: fix backtracking for throw routes") does good job on error propagation to the fib_rules_lookup() in fib rules core framework that also corrects throw routes handling, it does not solve route reference leakage problem happened when we return -EAGAIN to the fib_rules_lookup() and leave routing table entry referenced in arg->result.

If rule with matched throw route isn't last matched in the list we overwrite arg->result losing reference on throw route stored previously forever.

We also partially revert commit ab997ad40839 ("ipv6: fix the incorrect return value of throw route") since we never return routing table entry with dst.error == -EAGAIN when CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES is on. Also there is no point to check for RTF_REJECT flag since it is always set throw route.

Fixes 73ba57bfae4a ("ipv6: fix backtracking for throw routes")
---
 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c |   22 ++++++----------------
 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c    |    3 +--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c +6 -16
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct fib6_rule {
 struct dst_entry *fib6_rule_lookup(struct net *net, struct flowi6 *fl6,
 				   int flags, pol_lookup_t lookup)
 {
-	struct rt6_info *rt;
 	struct fib_lookup_arg arg = {
 		.lookup_ptr = lookup,
 		.flags = FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF,
@@ -41,21 +40,11 @@ struct dst_entry *fib6_rule_lookup(struc
 	fib_rules_lookup(net->ipv6.fib6_rules_ops,
 			 flowi6_to_flowi(fl6), flags, &arg);
 
-	rt = arg.result;
+	if (arg.result)
+		return arg.result;
 
-	if (!rt) {
-		dst_hold(&net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
-		return &net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst;
-	}
-
-	if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_REJECT &&
-	    rt->dst.error == -EAGAIN) {
-		ip6_rt_put(rt);
-		rt = net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
-		dst_hold(&rt->dst);
-	}
-
-	return &rt->dst;
+	dst_hold(&net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
+	return &net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst;
 }
 
 static int fib6_rule_action(struct fib_rule *rule, struct flowi *flp,
@@ -116,7 +105,8 @@ static int fib6_rule_action(struct fib_r
 			flp6->saddr = saddr;
 		}
 		err = rt->dst.error;
-		goto out;
+		if (err != -EAGAIN)
+			goto out;
 	}
 again:
 	ip6_rt_put(rt);
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c +1 -2
@@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ struct dst_entry *fib6_rule_lookup(struc
 	struct rt6_info *rt;
 
 	rt = lookup(net, net->ipv6.fib6_main_tbl, fl6, flags);
-	if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_REJECT &&
-	    rt->dst.error == -EAGAIN) {
+	if (rt->dst.error == -EAGAIN) {
 		ip6_rt_put(rt);
 		rt = net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
 		dst_hold(&rt->dst);

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/rtnetlink-add-ifla_group-to-ifla_policy.patch queue-4.4/ipv6-do-not-leak-throw-route-references.patch