Patch "xfrm: move xfrm_garbage_collect out of xfrm_policy_flush" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xfrm: move xfrm_garbage_collect out of xfrm_policy_flush
to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xfrm-move-xfrm_garbage_collect-out-of-xfrm_policy_flush.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
138437f591dd9a42d53c6fed1a3c85e02678851cMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 09:44:20 +0800
Subject: xfrm: move xfrm_garbage_collect out of xfrm_policy_flush
From: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
commit 138437f591dd9a42d53c6fed1a3c85e02678851c upstream.
Now we will force to do garbage collection if any policy removed in xfrm_policy_flush(). But during xfrm_net_exit(). We call flow_cache_fini() first and set set fc->percpu to NULL. Then after we call xfrm_policy_fini() -> frxm_policy_flush() -> flow_cache_flush(), we will get NULL pointer dereference when check percpu_empty. The code path looks like:
flow_cache_fini()
- fc->percpu = NULLxfrm_policy_fini()
- xfrm_policy_flush()
- xfrm_garbage_collect()
- flow_cache_flush()
- flow_cache_percpu_empty()
- fcp = per_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu, cpu)
To reproduce, just add ipsec in netns and then remove the netns.
v2:
As Xin Long suggested, since only two other places need to call it. move xfrm_garbage_collect() outside xfrm_policy_flush().
v3:
Fix subject mismatch after v2 fix.
--- net/key/af_key.c | 2 ++ net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ---- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
net/key/af_key.c +2 -0
@@ -2755,6 +2755,8 @@ static int pfkey_spdflush(struct sock *sint err, err2; err =xfrm_policy_flush (net,XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN , true); +if (!err) +xfrm_garbage_collect (net); err2 =unicast_flush_resp (sk, hdr);if (err || err2) {if (err == -ESRCH )/* empty table - old silent behavior */
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +0 -4
@@ -1006,10 +1006,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u err = -ESRCH ; out:spin_unlock_bh (&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); - -if (cnt) -xfrm_garbage_collect (net); -return err; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (xfrm_policy_flush);
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +1 -0
@@ -1999,6 +1999,7 @@ static int xfrm_flush_policy(struct sk_breturn 0 ;return err; } +xfrm_garbage_collect (net); c.data.type = type; c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.11/xfrm-move-xfrm_garbage_collect-out-of-xfrm_policy_flush.patch