powerpc/mm/radix: Properly clear process table entry
PATCH 1/2 powerpc/mm/radix: Properly clear process table entry
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
--- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c +9 -3
@@ -226,9 +226,15 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->context.cop_lockp =NULL ;#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ICSWX */ -if (radix_enabled ()) - process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb1 =0 ; -else +if (radix_enabled ()) { +/* +* Radix doesn't have a valid bit in the process table +* entries. However we know that at least P9 implementation +* will avoid caching an entry with an invalid RTS field, +* and 0 is invalid. So this will do. +*/ + process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb0 =0 ; + }else subpage_prot_free (mm);destroy_pagetable_page (mm);__destroy_context (mm->context.id);
Michael Ellerman
reviewerQuoted 2 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
.. but has no real world consequence? Or causes the system to instantly catch fire?
I'll tag it:
cheers
Quoted 23 lines
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c +9
-3@@ -226,9 +226,15 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->context.cop_lockp =NULL ;#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ICSWX */ -if (radix_enabled ()) - process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb1 =0 ; -else +if (radix_enabled ()) { +/* +* Radix doesn't have a valid bit in the process table +* entries. However we know that at least P9 implementation +* will avoid caching an entry with an invalid RTS field, +* and 0 is invalid. So this will do. +*/ + process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb0 =0 ; + }else subpage_prot_free (mm);destroy_pagetable_page (mm);__destroy_context (mm->context.id);
Quoted 7 lines · Michael Ellerman
Quoted 2 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
.. but has no real world consequence? Or causes the system to instantly catch fire?
It has no *immediate* consequence on P9 , but it can cause other bugs to become worse (such as the KVM issue I'm chasing).
Quoted 30 lines
I'll tag it:
Fixes 7e381c0ff618 ("powerpc/mm/radix: Add mmu context handling callback for radix")cheers
Quoted 23 lines
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c +9
-3@@ -226,9 +226,15 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->context.cop_lockp =NULL ;#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ICSWX */ -if (radix_enabled ()) - process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb1 =0 ; -else +if (radix_enabled ()) { +/* +* Radix doesn't have a valid bit in the process table +* entries. However we know that at least P9 implementation +* will avoid caching an entry with an invalid RTS field, +* and 0 is invalid. So this will do. +*/ + process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb0 =0 ; + }else subpage_prot_free (mm);destroy_pagetable_page (mm);__destroy_context (mm->context.id);
Michael Ellerman
reviewerQuoted 11 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Quoted 7 lines · Michael Ellerman
Quoted 2 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
.. but has no real world consequence? Or causes the system to instantly catch fire?
It has no *immediate* consequence on P9 , but it can cause other bugs to become worse (such as the KVM issue I'm chasing).
OK, I'll flag it for stable then to be safe.
cheers
Quoted 4 lines · On Sat, 08 Jul 2017 07:45:32 -0500 Benjamin Herrenschmidt…
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
Signed-off-by Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
This looks obviously correct to me.
Quoted 4 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
Signed-off-by Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Quoted 27 lines
--- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_book3s64.c +9
-3@@ -226,9 +226,15 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->context.cop_lockp =NULL ;#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_ICSWX */ -if (radix_enabled ()) - process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb1 =0 ; -else +if (radix_enabled ()) { +/* +* Radix doesn't have a valid bit in the process table +* entries. However we know that at least P9 implementation +* will avoid caching an entry with an invalid RTS field, +* and 0 is invalid. So this will do. +*/ + process_tb[mm->context.id].prtb0 =0 ; + }else subpage_prot_free (mm);destroy_pagetable_page (mm);__destroy_context (mm->context.id);
Michael Ellerman
AppliedQuoted 5 lines · Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a context is entry 0, not entry 1
Signed-off-by Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/c6bb0b8d426a8cf865ca9c8a532cc3
cheers