Skip to contentSkip to conversation

i2c: designware-slave: constify i2c_algorithm structure

PATCH Applied Gustavo A. R. Silva 3 participants 4 messages Jul 9, 2017 – Aug 12, 2017

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 i2c: designware-slave: constify i2c_algorithm structure

Check for i2c_algorithm structures that are only stored in the algo field of an i2c_adapter structure. This field is declared const, so i2c_algorithm structures that have this property can be declared as const also.

This issue was identified using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:

@r disable optional_qualifier@
identifier i;
position p;
@@
static struct i2c_algorithm i@p = { ... };

@ok@
identifier r.i;
struct i2c_adapter e;
position p;
@@
e.algo = &i@p;

@bad@
position p != {r.p,ok.p};
identifier r.i;
@@
i@p

@depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
identifier r.i;
@@
static
+const
struct i2c_algorithm i = { ... };

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c +1 -1
index 4012c74..e62799e 100644
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr_slave(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
 }
 
-static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
+static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
 	.functionality = i2c_dw_func,
 	.reg_slave = i2c_dw_reg_slave,
 	.unreg_slave = i2c_dw_unreg_slave,
Signature · 1 line
2.5.0
reviewer Acked-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 28 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

Check for i2c_algorithm structures that are only stored in the algo field of an i2c_adapter structure. This field is declared const, so i2c_algorithm structures that have this property can be declared as const also.

This issue was identified using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:

@r disable optional_qualifier@
identifier i;
position p;
@@
static struct i2c_algorithm i@p = { ... };

@ok@
identifier r.i;
struct i2c_adapter e;
position p;
@@
e.algo = &i@p;

@bad@
position p != {r.p,ok.p};
identifier r.i;
@@
i@p

Quoted 6 lines

@depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
identifier r.i;
@@
static
+const
 struct i2c_algorithm i = { ... };

I don't think it's a good idea to copy'n'paste patch to each change where you fixing the issue. Can you create a github repository of the coccinelle recipes and give just a link?

Other than that, I'm fine with the change as long as it compiles without troubles (had seen recently similar patch that has been sent without actual testing).

Quoted 21 lines

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 2 +-

 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c +0 -0
index 4012c74..e62799e 100644
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr_slave(int this_irq,
 void *dev_id)
  	return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
  }

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c +1 -1
-static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
+static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {

  .functionality = i2c_dw_func,
  .reg_slave = i2c_dw_reg_slave,
  .unreg_slave = i2c_dw_unreg_slave,

Signature · 2 lines
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Intel Finland Oy
#2 lore raw

Hi Andy,

Quoted 34 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 27 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

Check for i2c_algorithm structures that are only stored in the algo field of an i2c_adapter structure. This field is declared const, so i2c_algorithm structures that have this property can be declared as const also.

This issue was identified using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:

@r disable optional_qualifier@
identifier i;
position p;
@@
static struct i2c_algorithm i@p = { ... };

@ok@
identifier r.i;
struct i2c_adapter e;
position p;
@@
e.algo = &i@p;

@bad@
position p != {r.p,ok.p};
identifier r.i;
@@
i@p

Quoted 6 lines

@depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
identifier r.i;
@@
static
+const
struct i2c_algorithm i = { ... };

Quoted 3 lines

I don't think it's a good idea to copy'n'paste patch to each change where you fixing the issue. Can you create a github repository of the coccinelle recipes and give just a link?

I will take note of that, thanks for the suggestion.

Quoted 5 lines

Other than that, I'm fine with the change as long as it compiles without troubles (had seen recently similar patch that has been sent without actual testing).

Thank you

Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c +1 -1
index 4012c74..e62799e 100644
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr_slave(int this_irq,
 void *dev_id)
  	return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
  }
 
-static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
+static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
  	.functionality = i2c_dw_func,
  	.reg_slave = i2c_dw_reg_slave,

.unreg_slave = i2c_dw_unreg_slave,

Signature · 1 line
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Applied
#3 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

I don't think it's a good idea to copy'n'paste patch to each change where you fixing the issue. Can you create a github repository of the coccinelle recipes and give just a link?

I will take note of that, thanks for the suggestion.

I took the liberty to squash the 4 patches into one commit and fixed the commit message by removing the semantic patch.

Applied to for-next, thanks!