Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "ipmi:ssif: Add missing unlock in error branch" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jul 25, 2017

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

ipmi:ssif: Add missing unlock in error branch

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
ipmi-ssif-add-missing-unlock-in-error-branch.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 4495ec6d770e1bca7a04e93ac453ab6720c56c5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:18:08 -0500
Subject: ipmi:ssif: Add missing unlock in error branch

From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>

commit 4495ec6d770e1bca7a04e93ac453ab6720c56c5d upstream.

When getting flags, a response to a different message would result in a deadlock because of a missing unlock. Add that unlock and a comment. Found by static analysis.

---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c +5 -0
@@ -758,6 +758,11 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif
 			       result, len, data[2]);
 		} else if (data[0] != (IPMI_NETFN_APP_REQUEST | 1) << 2
 			   || data[1] != IPMI_GET_MSG_FLAGS_CMD) {
+			/*
+			 * Don't abort here, maybe it was a queued
+			 * response to a previous command.
+			 */
+			ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond(ssif_info, flags);
 			pr_warn(PFX "Invalid response getting flags: %x %x\n",
 				data[0], data[1]);
 		} else {

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/ipmi-ssif-add-missing-unlock-in-error-branch.patch queue-4.4/ipmi-use-rcu-lock-around-call-to-intf-handlers-sender.patch