Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "tcmu: Fix possbile memory leak / OOPs when recalculating cmd base size" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Aug 7, 2017

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

tcmu: Fix possbile memory leak / OOPs when recalculating cmd base size

to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
tcmu-fix-possbile-memory-leak-oops-when-recalculating-cmd-base-size.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From b3743c71b7c33a126d6d8942bb268775987400ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Xiubo Li <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:59:43 +0800
Subject: tcmu: Fix possbile memory leak / OOPs when recalculating cmd base size

From: Xiubo Li <[email protected]>

commit b3743c71b7c33a126d6d8942bb268775987400ec upstream.

For all the entries allocated from the ring cmd area, the memory is something like the stack memory, which will always reserve the old data, so the entry->req.iov_bidi_cnt maybe none zero.

On some environments, the crash could be reproduce very easy and some not. The following is the crash core trace as reported by Damien:

[  240.143969] CPU: 0 PID: 1285 Comm: iscsi_trx Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #3
[  240.150607] Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H87-PRO, BIOS 2104 10/28/2014
[  240.157331] task: ffff8807de4f5800 task.stack: ffffc900047dc000
[  240.163270] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10
[  240.167377] RSP: 0018:ffffc900047dfc68 EFLAGS: 00010202
[  240.172621] RAX: ffffc9065db85540 RBX: ffff8807f7980000 RCX: 0000000000000010
[  240.179771] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffff8807de574fe0 RDI: ffffc9065db85540
[  240.186930] RBP: ffffc900047dfd30 R08: ffff8807de41b000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  240.194088] R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffff8807e9b726f0 R12: 00000006565726b0
[  240.201246] R13: ffffc90007612ea0 R14: 000000065657d540 R15: 0000000000000000
[  240.208397] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88081fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  240.216510] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  240.222280] CR2: ffffc9065db85540 CR3: 0000000001c0f000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
[  240.229430] Call Trace:
[  240.231887]  ? tcmu_queue_cmd+0x83c/0xa80
[  240.235916]  ? target_check_reservation+0xcd/0x6f0
[  240.240725]  __target_execute_cmd+0x27/0xa0
[  240.244918]  target_execute_cmd+0x232/0x2c0
[  240.249124]  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x64/0xa0
[  240.253499]  iscsit_execute_cmd+0x20d/0x270
[  240.257693]  iscsit_sequence_cmd+0x110/0x190
[  240.261985]  iscsit_get_rx_pdu+0x360/0xc80
[  240.267565]  ? iscsi_target_rx_thread+0x54/0xd0
[  240.273571]  iscsi_target_rx_thread+0x9a/0xd0
[  240.279413]  kthread+0x113/0x150
[  240.284120]  ? iscsi_target_tx_thread+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  240.290297]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
[  240.296297]  ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40
[  240.301332] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 eb 1e 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 48
c1 e9 03 83 e2 07 f3 48 a5 89 d1 f3 a4 c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48
89 d1 <f3> a4 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 83 fa 20 72 7e 40 38
[  240.321751] RIP: memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10 RSP: ffffc900047dfc68
[  240.328838] CR2: ffffc9065db85540
[  240.333667] ---[ end trace b7e5354cfb54d08b ]---

To fix this, just memset all the entry memory before using it, and also to be more readable we adjust the bidi code.

Fixed: fe25cc34795(tcmu: Recalculate the tcmu_cmd size to save cmd area
memories)

---
 drivers/target/target_core_user.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/target/target_core_user.c +5 -7
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int scatter_data_area(struct tcmu
 			to_offset = get_block_offset_user(udev, dbi,
 					block_remaining);
 			offset = DATA_BLOCK_SIZE - block_remaining;
-			to = (void *)(unsigned long)to + offset;
+			to += offset;
 
 			if (*iov_cnt != 0 &&
 			    to_offset == iov_tail(udev, *iov)) {
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void gather_data_area(struct tcmu
 			copy_bytes = min_t(size_t, sg_remaining,
 					block_remaining);
 			offset = DATA_BLOCK_SIZE - block_remaining;
-			from = (void *)(unsigned long)from + offset;
+			from += offset;
 			tcmu_flush_dcache_range(from, copy_bytes);
 			memcpy(to + sg->length - sg_remaining, from,
 					copy_bytes);
@@ -714,10 +714,9 @@ tcmu_queue_cmd_ring(struct tcmu_cmd *tcm
 	}
 
 	entry = (void *) mb + CMDR_OFF + cmd_head;
+	memset(entry, 0, command_size);
 	tcmu_hdr_set_op(&entry->hdr.len_op, TCMU_OP_CMD);
 	entry->hdr.cmd_id = tcmu_cmd->cmd_id;
-	entry->hdr.kflags = 0;
-	entry->hdr.uflags = 0;
 
 	/* Handle allocating space from the data area */
 	tcmu_cmd_reset_dbi_cur(tcmu_cmd);
@@ -736,11 +735,10 @@ tcmu_queue_cmd_ring(struct tcmu_cmd *tcm
 		return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
 	}
 	entry->req.iov_cnt = iov_cnt;
-	entry->req.iov_dif_cnt = 0;
 
 	/* Handle BIDI commands */
+	iov_cnt = 0;
 	if (se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_BIDI) {
-		iov_cnt = 0;
 		iov++;
 		ret = scatter_data_area(udev, tcmu_cmd,
 					se_cmd->t_bidi_data_sg,
@@ -753,8 +751,8 @@ tcmu_queue_cmd_ring(struct tcmu_cmd *tcm
 			pr_err("tcmu: alloc and scatter bidi data failed\n");
 			return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
 		}
-		entry->req.iov_bidi_cnt = iov_cnt;
 	}
+	entry->req.iov_bidi_cnt = iov_cnt;
 
 	/*
 	 * Recalaulate the command's base size and size according

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.12/tcmu-fix-flushing-cmd-entry-dcache-page.patch queue-4.12/tcmu-fix-possbile-memory-leak-oops-when-recalculating-cmd-base-size.patch