Patch "mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM
to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-vmalloc.c-don-t-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
704b862f9efd6d4c87a8d0a344dda19bda9c6b69Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:16:27 -0700
Subject: mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM
From: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
commit 704b862f9efd6d4c87a8d0a344dda19bda9c6b69 upstream.
Commit 19809c2da28a ("mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly") added use of __GFP_HIGHMEM for allocations. vmalloc_32 may use GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32 which does not play nice with __GFP_HIGHMEM and will trigger a BUG in gfp_zone.
Only add __GFP_HIGHMEM if we aren't using GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482249
--- mm/vmalloc.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
mm/vmalloc.c +8 -5
@@ -1669,7 +1669,10 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(structstruct page **pages;unsigned int nr_pages, array_size, i;const gfp_t nested_gfp = (gfp_mask &GFP_RECLAIM_MASK ) | __GFP_ZERO; -const gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_NOWARN; +const gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN; +const gfp_t highmem_mask = (gfp_mask & (GFP_DMA |GFP_DMA32 )) ? +0 : + __GFP_HIGHMEM; nr_pages =get_vm_area_size (area) >>PAGE_SHIFT ; array_size = (nr_pages *sizeof (struct page *));
@@ -1677,7 +1680,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct area->nr_pages = nr_pages;/* Please note that the recursion is strictly bounded. */ if (array_size >PAGE_SIZE ) { - pages =__vmalloc_node (array_size,1 , nested_gfp|__GFP_HIGHMEM, + pages =__vmalloc_node (array_size,1 , nested_gfp|highmem_mask,PAGE_KERNEL , node, area->caller); }else { pages =kmalloc_node (array_size, nested_gfp, node);
@@ -1698,9 +1701,9 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct }if (node ==NUMA_NO_NODE ) - page =alloc_page (alloc_mask); + page =alloc_page (alloc_mask|highmem_mask);else - page =alloc_pages_node (node, alloc_mask,0 ); + page =alloc_pages_node (node, alloc_mask|highmem_mask,0 );if (unlikely (!page)) {/* Successfully allocated i pages, free them in __vunmap() */
@@ -1708,7 +1711,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct goto fail; } area->pages[i] = page; -if (gfpflags_allow_blocking (gfp_mask)) +if (gfpflags_allow_blocking (gfp_mask|highmem_mask))cond_resched (); }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.12/mm-vmalloc.c-don-t-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch queue-4.12/mm-cma_debug.c-fix-stack-corruption-due-to-sprintf-usage.patch