Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Aug 20, 2017

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM

to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
mm-vmalloc.c-don-t-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 704b862f9efd6d4c87a8d0a344dda19bda9c6b69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:16:27 -0700
Subject: mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM

From: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>

commit 704b862f9efd6d4c87a8d0a344dda19bda9c6b69 upstream.

Commit 19809c2da28a ("mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly") added use of __GFP_HIGHMEM for allocations. vmalloc_32 may use GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32 which does not play nice with __GFP_HIGHMEM and will trigger a BUG in gfp_zone.

Only add __GFP_HIGHMEM if we aren't using GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482249

Fixes 19809c2da28a ("mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly")
Cc Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
mm/vmalloc.c +8 -5
@@ -1669,7 +1669,10 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
 	struct page **pages;
 	unsigned int nr_pages, array_size, i;
 	const gfp_t nested_gfp = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) | __GFP_ZERO;
-	const gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_NOWARN;
+	const gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN;
+	const gfp_t highmem_mask = (gfp_mask & (GFP_DMA | GFP_DMA32)) ?
+					0 :
+					__GFP_HIGHMEM;
 
 	nr_pages = get_vm_area_size(area) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	array_size = (nr_pages * sizeof(struct page *));
@@ -1677,7 +1680,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
 	area->nr_pages = nr_pages;
 	/* Please note that the recursion is strictly bounded. */
 	if (array_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
-		pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, nested_gfp|__GFP_HIGHMEM,
+		pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, nested_gfp|highmem_mask,
 				PAGE_KERNEL, node, area->caller);
 	} else {
 		pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, nested_gfp, node);
@@ -1698,9 +1701,9 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
 		}
 
 		if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-			page = alloc_page(alloc_mask);
+			page = alloc_page(alloc_mask|highmem_mask);
 		else
-			page = alloc_pages_node(node, alloc_mask, 0);
+			page = alloc_pages_node(node, alloc_mask|highmem_mask, 0);
 
 		if (unlikely(!page)) {
 			/* Successfully allocated i pages, free them in __vunmap() */
@@ -1708,7 +1711,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
 			goto fail;
 		}
 		area->pages[i] = page;
-		if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask))
+		if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask|highmem_mask))
 			cond_resched();
 	}
 

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.12/mm-vmalloc.c-don-t-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch queue-4.12/mm-cma_debug.c-fix-stack-corruption-due-to-sprintf-usage.patch