Skip to contentSkip to conversation

x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate

PATCH In review Prarit Bhargava 1 participant 2 messages Sep 6, 2017 – Sep 7, 2017

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate

A system booted with a small number of cores enabled per package panics because the estimate of __max_logical_packages is too low. This occurs when the total number of active cores across all packages is less than the maximum core count for a single package.

ie) On a 4 package system with 20 cores/package where only 4 cores are enabled on each package, the value of __max_logical_packages is calculated as DIV_ROUND_UP(16 / 20) = 1 and not 4.

Improve the estimate of __max_logical_packages by comparing the current estimate to the number of SMBIOS type 4 Processor Information structures. If __max_logical_packages is still insufficient during boot use the largest possible value of Package ID.

Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
Cc Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Cc Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
Cc Vitaly Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
Cc Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc "Ville Syrjälä" <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c   | 13 ++++++++++---
 drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c |  9 +++++++++
 include/linux/dmi.h         |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +10 -3
index 54b9e89d4d6b..54c59f3b3d01 100644
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
 #include <linux/stackprotector.h>
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
 #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
+#include <linux/dmi.h>
 
 #include <asm/acpi.h>
 #include <asm/desc.h>
@@ -298,7 +299,10 @@ int topology_update_package_map(unsigned int pkg, unsigned int cpu)
 	if (logical_packages >= __max_logical_packages) {
 		pr_warn("Package %u of CPU %u exceeds BIOS package data %u.\n",
 			logical_packages, cpu, __max_logical_packages);
-		return -ENOSPC;
+		if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING)
+			__max_logical_packages = max_physical_pkg_id;
+		else
+			return -ENOSPC;
 	}
 
 	new = logical_packages++;
@@ -332,6 +336,8 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int cpu)
 	size_t size;
 
 	/*
+	 * Estimate the number of logical packages.
+	 *
 	 * Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogenous systems. That
 	 * might change in the future....
 	 *
@@ -360,6 +366,8 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int cpu)
 	}
 
 	__max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(total_cpus, ncpus);
+	__max_logical_packages = max_t(unsigned int, __max_logical_packages,
+				       dmi_processor_count);
 	logical_packages = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -373,9 +381,8 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int cpu)
 	size = BITS_TO_LONGS(max_physical_pkg_id) * sizeof(unsigned long);
 	physical_package_map = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 
-	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
-
 	topology_update_package_map(c->phys_proc_id, cpu);
+	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
 }
 
 void __init smp_store_boot_cpu_info(void)
drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c +9 -0
index 783041964439..177a571e6776 100644
@@ -420,6 +420,12 @@ void __init dmi_memdev_walk(void)
 	}
 }
 
+unsigned int dmi_processor_count;
+void __init dmi_save_processor(const struct dmi_header *dm)
+{
+	dmi_processor_count++;
+}
+
 /*
  *	Process a DMI table entry. Right now all we care about are the BIOS
  *	and machine entries. For 2.5 we should pull the smbus controller info
@@ -455,6 +461,9 @@ static void __init dmi_decode(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *dummy)
 		dmi_save_ident(dm, DMI_CHASSIS_SERIAL, 7);
 		dmi_save_ident(dm, DMI_CHASSIS_ASSET_TAG, 8);
 		break;
+	case 4:		/* Processor Information */
+		dmi_save_processor(dm);
+		break;
 	case 9:		/* System Slots */
 		dmi_save_system_slot(dm);
 		break;
include/linux/dmi.h +2 -0
index 9bbf21a516e4..c03f6a5d55f7 100644
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ extern int dmi_walk(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *),
 	void *private_data);
 extern bool dmi_match(enum dmi_field f, const char *str);
 extern void dmi_memdev_name(u16 handle, const char **bank, const char **device);
+extern unsigned int dmi_processor_count;
 
 #else
 
@@ -143,6 +144,7 @@ static inline void dmi_memdev_name(u16 handle, const char **bank,
 		const char **device) { }
 static inline const struct dmi_system_id *
 	dmi_first_match(const struct dmi_system_id *list) { return NULL; }
+static unsigned int dmi_processor_count;
 
 #endif
 
Signature · 1 line
1.8.5.5
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Prarit Bhargava

A system booted with a small number of cores enabled per package panics because the estimate of __max_logical_packages is too low. This occurs when the total number of active cores across all packages is less than the maximum core count for a single package.

Quoted 8 lines

ie) On a 4 package system with 20 cores/package where only 4 cores are enabled on each package, the value of __max_logical_packages is calculated as DIV_ROUND_UP(16 / 20) = 1 and not 4.

Improve the estimate of __max_logical_packages by comparing the current estimate to the number of SMBIOS type 4 Processor Information structures. If __max_logical_packages is still insufficient during boot use the largest possible value of Package ID.

If I move this calculation to native_smp_cpus_done() I can eliminate a chunk of code and use boot_cpu_data.booted_cores to get a correct value.

I'll resubmit with a new patch.

P.