tracing: erase irqsoff trace with empty write
PATCH 1/1 tracing: erase irqsoff trace with empty write
One convenient way to erase trace is "echo > trace". However, this is currently broken if the current tracer is irqsoff tracer. This is because irqsoff tracer use max_buffer as the default trace buffer.
Set the max_buffer as the one to be cleared when it's the trace buffer currently in use.
--- kernel/trace/trace.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/trace/trace.c +8 -2
@@ -4020,11 +4020,17 @@ static int tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)/* If this file was open for write, then erase contents */ if ((file->f_mode &FMODE_WRITE ) && (file->f_flags &O_TRUNC )) {int cpu =tracing_get_cpu (inode); +struct trace_buffer *tr_buf = &tr->trace_buffer; + +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE +if (tr->current_trace->print_max) + tr_buf = &tr->max_buffer; +#endif if (cpu ==RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS ) -tracing_reset_online_cpus (&tr->trace_buffer); +tracing_reset_online_cpus (tr_buf);else -tracing_reset (&tr->trace_buffer, cpu); +tracing_reset (tr_buf, cpu); }if (file->f_mode &FMODE_READ ) {
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:16:35 -0700 Bo Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
One convenient way to erase trace is "echo > trace". However, this is currently broken if the current tracer is irqsoff tracer. This is because irqsoff tracer use
max_bufferas the default trace buffer.Set the
max_bufferas the one to be cleared when it's the trace buffer currently in use.
Hi Bo,
I have no problems with the logic of the patch. But just one nit. The tr->trace_buffer has been called "trace_buf" elsewhere in the file. Can you resend with using the variable name "trace_buf" instead of "tr_buf" just to keep it consistent in the file. It's also been called 'buf' but trace_buf would probably be more appropriate.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Quoted 30 lines
Signed-off-by Bo Yan <[email protected]>--- kernel/trace/trace.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)kernel/trace/trace.c +8
-2@@ -4020,11 +4020,17 @@ static int tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)/* If this file was open for write, then erase contents */ if ((file->f_mode &FMODE_WRITE ) && (file->f_flags &O_TRUNC )) {int cpu =tracing_get_cpu (inode); +struct trace_buffer *tr_buf = &tr->trace_buffer; + +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE +if (tr->current_trace->print_max) + tr_buf = &tr->max_buffer; +#endif if (cpu ==RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS ) -tracing_reset_online_cpus (&tr->trace_buffer); +tracing_reset_online_cpus (tr_buf);else -tracing_reset (&tr->trace_buffer, cpu); +tracing_reset (tr_buf, cpu); }if (file->f_mode &FMODE_READ ) {
Steven,
Thanks for review. I have posted the following update
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/18/715
Bo
Quoted 54 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 7 lines · On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:16:35 -0700 Bo Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
One convenient way to erase trace is "echo > trace". However, this is currently broken if the current tracer is irqsoff tracer. This is because irqsoff tracer use
max_bufferas the default trace buffer.Set the
max_bufferas the one to be cleared when it's the trace buffer currently in use.Hi Bo,
I have no problems with the logic of the patch. But just one nit. The
tr->trace_bufferhas been called "trace_buf" elsewhere in the file. Can you resend with using the variable name "trace_buf" instead of "tr_buf" just to keep it consistent in the file. It's also been called 'buf' buttrace_bufwould probably be more appropriate.Thanks!
-- Steve
Quoted 30 lines
Signed-off-by Bo Yan <[email protected]>--- kernel/trace/trace.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)kernel/trace/trace.c +8
-2@@ -4020,11 +4020,17 @@ static int tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)/* If this file was open for write, then erase contents */ if ((file->f_mode &FMODE_WRITE ) && (file->f_flags &O_TRUNC )) {int cpu =tracing_get_cpu (inode); +struct trace_buffer *tr_buf = &tr->trace_buffer; + +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE +if (tr->current_trace->print_max) + tr_buf = &tr->max_buffer; +#endif if (cpu ==RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS ) -tracing_reset_online_cpus (&tr->trace_buffer); +tracing_reset_online_cpus (tr_buf);else -tracing_reset (&tr->trace_buffer, cpu); +tracing_reset (tr_buf, cpu); }if (file->f_mode &FMODE_READ ) {
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:41:34 -0700 Bo Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
Steven,
Thanks for review. I have posted the following update
Yes, I actually applied it. It's pushed to my ftrace/urgent branch, and I'm currently testing it. If/when it passes I'll be pushing it off to Linus.
Thanks!
-- Steve