configure: Allow --enable-seccomp on s390x, too
PATCH 1/1 configure: Allow --enable-seccomp on s390x, too
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
--- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
configure +1 -1
@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver="2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver="2.3.0" ;; *)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Huth
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
I don't have a s390x hardware to test so I'll have to trust you. Anyone from IBM interested in testing this patch as well?
Quoted 21 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <[email protected]>--- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)configure +1
-1@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver="2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver="2.3.0" ;; *)Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
Signature · 2 lines
Eduardo Otubo Senior Software Engineer @ RedHat
Quoted 3 lines · Thomas Huth
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
Seems to work fine on s390x.
Quoted 20 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <[email protected]>--- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)configure +1
-1@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver="2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver="2.3.0" ;; *)
Eduardo Otubo
Acked-byQuoted 7 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 3 lines · Thomas Huth
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
Seems to work fine on s390x.
Cool, thanks :-)
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 21 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <[email protected]>--- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)configure +1
-1@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver="2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver="2.3.0" ;; *)
Signature · 2 lines
Eduardo Otubo Senior Software Engineer @ RedHat
Quoted 5 lines · Thomas Huth
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
ack
Cornelia Huck
AppliedQuoted 14 lines · On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:36:03 +0200 Thomas Huth <[email protected]> wrote:
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
Signed-off-by Thomas Huth <[email protected]>--- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)configure +0
-0
configure if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then · line 2038
Quoted 8 lines
configure +1
-1@@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" != "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver="2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver="2.3.0" ;; *)
Thanks, applied.