Patch "srcu: Provide ordering for CPU not involved in grace period" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
srcu: Provide ordering for CPU not involved in grace period
to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
srcu-provide-ordering-for-cpu-not-involved-in-grace-period.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
35732cf9dd38b1efb0f2f22c91c61b51337d1ac3Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:30:21 -0700
Subject: srcu: Provide ordering for CPU not involved in grace period
From: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
commit 35732cf9dd38b1efb0f2f22c91c61b51337d1ac3 upstream.
Tree RCU guarantees that every online CPU has a memory barrier between any given grace period and any of that CPU's RCU read-side sections that must be ordered against that grace period. Since RCU doesn't always know where read-side critical sections are, the actual implementation guarantees order against prior and subsequent non-idle non-offline code, whether in an RCU read-side critical section or not. As a result, there does not need to be a memory barrier at the end of synchronize_rcu() and friends because the ordering internal to the grace period has ordered every CPU's post-grace-period execution against each CPU's pre-grace-period execution, again for all non-idle online CPUs.
In contrast, SRCU can have non-idle online CPUs that are completely uninvolved in a given SRCU grace period, for example, a CPU that never runs any SRCU read-side critical sections and took no part in the grace-period processing. It is in theory possible for a given synchronize_srcu()'s wakeup to be delivered to a CPU that was completely uninvolved in the prior SRCU grace period, which could mean that the code following that synchronize_srcu() would end up being unordered with respect to both the grace period and any pre-existing SRCU read-side critical sections.
This commit therefore adds an smp_mb() to the end of __synchronize_srcu(), which prevents this scenario from occurring.
--- kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c +9 -0
@@ -896,6 +896,15 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct sr__call_srcu (sp, &rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu, do_norm);wait_for_completion (&rcu.completion);destroy_rcu_head_on_stack (&rcu.head); + +/* +* Make sure that later code is ordered after the SRCU grace +* period. This pairs with the raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node() +* in srcu_invoke_callbacks(). Unlike Tree RCU, this is needed +* because the current CPU might have been totally uninvolved with +* (and thus unordered against) that grace period. +*/ +smp_mb (); }/**
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.13/srcu-provide-ordering-for-cpu-not-involved-in-grace-period.patch queue-4.13/smp-hotplug-handle-removal-correctly-in-cpuhp_store_callbacks.patch