Patch "x86/mm: Fix fault error path using unsafe vma pointer" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/mm: Fix fault error path using unsafe vma pointer
to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-mm-fix-fault-error-path-using-unsafe-vma-pointer.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
a3c4fb7c9c2ebfd50b8c60f6c069932bb319bc37Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laurent Dufour <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:32:15 +0200
Subject: x86/mm: Fix fault error path using unsafe vma pointer
From: Laurent Dufour <[email protected]>
commit a3c4fb7c9c2ebfd50b8c60f6c069932bb319bc37 upstream.
commit 7b2d0dbac489 ("x86/mm/pkeys: Pass VMA down in to fault signal generation code") passes down a vma pointer to the error path, but that is done once the mmap_sem is released when calling mm_fault_error() from __do_page_fault().
This is dangerous as the vma structure is no more safe to be used once the mmap_sem has been released. As only the protection key value is required in the error processing, we could just pass down this value.
Fix it by passing a pointer to a protection key value down to the fault signal generation code. The use of a pointer allows to keep the check generating a warning message in fill_sig_info_pkey() when the vma was not known. If the pointer is valid, the protection value can be accessed by deferencing the pointer.
[ tglx: Made *pkey u32 as that's the type which is passed in siginfo ]
--- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
arch/x86/mm/fault.c +24 -23
@@ -192,8 +192,7 @@ is_prefetch(struct pt_regs *regs, unsign* 6. T1 : reaches here, sees vma_pkey(vma)=5, when we really * faulted on a pte with its pkey=4. */ -static void fill_sig_info_pkey (int si_code,siginfo_t *info, -struct vm_area_struct *vma) +static void fill_sig_info_pkey (int si_code,siginfo_t *info,u32 *pkey) {/* This is effectively an #ifdef */ if (!boot_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_OSPKE ))
@@ -209,7 +208,7 @@ static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_co* valid VMA, so we should never reach this without a * valid VMA. */ -if (!vma) { +if (!pkey) {WARN_ONCE (1 ,"PKU fault with no VMA passed in" ); info->si_pkey =0 ;return ;
@@ -219,13 +218,12 @@ static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_co* absolutely guranteed to be 100% accurate because of * the race explained above. */ - info->si_pkey =vma_pkey (vma); + info->si_pkey = *pkey; }static void force_sig_info_fault (int si_signo,int si_code,unsigned long address, -struct task_struct *tsk,struct vm_area_struct *vma, -int fault) +struct task_struct *tsk,u32 *pkey,int fault) {unsigned lsb =0 ;siginfo_t info;
@@ -240,7 +238,7 @@ force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int s lsb =PAGE_SHIFT ; info.si_addr_lsb = lsb; -fill_sig_info_pkey (si_code, &info, vma); +fill_sig_info_pkey (si_code, &info, pkey);force_sig_info (si_signo, &info, tsk); }
@@ -758,8 +756,6 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsignestruct task_struct *tsk = current;unsigned long flags;int sig; -/* No context means no VMA to pass down */ -struct vm_area_struct *vma =NULL ;/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */ if (fixup_exception (regs,X86_TRAP_PF )) {
@@ -784,7 +780,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigne/* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */ force_sig_info_fault (signal, si_code, address, - tsk, vma,0 ); + tsk,NULL ,0 ); }/*
@@ -893,8 +889,7 @@ show_signal_msg(struct pt_regs *regs, unstatic void __bad_area_nosemaphore (struct pt_regs *regs,unsigned long error_code, -unsigned long address,struct vm_area_struct *vma, -int si_code) +unsigned long address,u32 *pkey,int si_code) {struct task_struct *tsk = current;
@@ -942,7 +937,7 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *r tsk->thread.error_code = error_code; tsk->thread.trap_nr =X86_TRAP_PF ; -force_sig_info_fault (SIGSEGV , si_code, address, tsk, vma,0 ); +force_sig_info_fault (SIGSEGV , si_code, address, tsk, pkey,0 );return ; }
@@ -955,9 +950,9 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *r static noinline voidbad_area_nosemaphore (struct pt_regs *regs,unsigned long error_code, -unsigned long address,struct vm_area_struct *vma) +unsigned long address,u32 *pkey) { -__bad_area_nosemaphore (regs, error_code, address, vma,SEGV_MAPERR ); +__bad_area_nosemaphore (regs, error_code, address, pkey,SEGV_MAPERR ); } static void
@@ -965,6 +960,10 @@ __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigne unsigned long address, struct vm_area_struct *vma, int si_code) { struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; +u32 pkey; + +if (vma) + pkey =vma_pkey (vma);/* * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
@@ -972,7 +971,8 @@ __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigne*/ up_read (&mm->mmap_sem); -__bad_area_nosemaphore (regs, error_code, address, vma, si_code); +__bad_area_nosemaphore (regs, error_code, address, + (vma) ? &pkey :NULL , si_code); }static noinline void
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *restatic void do_sigbus (struct pt_regs *regs,unsigned long error_code,unsigned long address, -struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned int fault) +u32 *pkey,unsigned int fault) {struct task_struct *tsk = current;int code =BUS_ADRERR ;
@@ -1042,13 +1042,12 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned code =BUS_MCEERR_AR ; }#endif -force_sig_info_fault (SIGBUS , code, address, tsk, vma, fault); +force_sig_info_fault (SIGBUS , code, address, tsk, pkey, fault); } static noinline voidmm_fault_error (struct pt_regs *regs,unsigned long error_code, -unsigned long address,struct vm_area_struct *vma, -unsigned int fault) +unsigned long address,u32 *pkey,unsigned int fault) {if (fatal_signal_pending (current) && !(error_code &PF_USER )) {no_context (regs, error_code, address,0 ,0 );
@@ -1072,9 +1071,9 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, uns }else {if (fault & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS |VM_FAULT_HWPOISON |VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE )) -do_sigbus (regs, error_code, address, vma, fault); +do_sigbus (regs, error_code, address, pkey, fault);else if (fault &VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV ) -bad_area_nosemaphore (regs, error_code, address, vma); +bad_area_nosemaphore (regs, error_code, address, pkey);else BUG (); }
@@ -1268,6 +1267,7 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unstruct mm_struct *mm;int fault, major =0 ;unsigned int flags =FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY |FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE ; +u32 pkey; tsk = current; mm = tsk->mm;
@@ -1468,9 +1468,10 @@ good_area:return ; } + pkey =vma_pkey (vma);up_read (&mm->mmap_sem);if (unlikely (fault &VM_FAULT_ERROR )) { -mm_fault_error (regs, error_code, address, vma, fault); +mm_fault_error (regs, error_code, address, &pkey, fault);return ; }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.13/x86-mm-fix-fault-error-path-using-unsafe-vma-pointer.patch