FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: page_vma_mapped: ensure pmd is loaded with READ_ONCE" failed to apply to 4.13-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.13-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
a7b100953aa33a5bbdc3e5e7f2241b9c0704606eMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:58:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: page_vma_mapped: ensure pmd is loaded with READ_ONCE
outside of lock
Loading the pmd without holding the pmd_lock exposes us to races with concurrent updaters of the page tables but, worse still, it also allows the compiler to cache the pmd value in a register and reuse it later on, even if we've performed a READ_ONCE in between and seen a more recent value.
In the case of page_vma_mapped_walk, this leads to the following crash when the pmd loaded for the initial pmd_trans_huge check is all zeroes and a subsequent valid table entry is loaded by check_pmd. We then proceed into map_pte, but the compiler re-uses the zero entry inside pte_offset_map, resulting in a junk pointer being installed in pvmw->pte:
PC is at check_pte+0x20/0x170
LR is at page_vma_mapped_walk+0x2e0/0x540
[...]
Process doio (pid: 2463, stack limit = 0xffff00000f2e8000)
Call trace:
check_pte+0x20/0x170
page_vma_mapped_walk+0x2e0/0x540
page_mkclean_one+0xac/0x278
rmap_walk_file+0xf0/0x238
rmap_walk+0x64/0xa0
page_mkclean+0x90/0xa8
clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x84/0x2a8
mpage_submit_page+0x34/0x98
mpage_process_page_bufs+0x164/0x170
mpage_prepare_extent_to_map+0x134/0x2b8
ext4_writepages+0x484/0xe30
do_writepages+0x44/0xe8
__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xbc/0x110
file_write_and_wait_range+0x48/0xd8
ext4_sync_file+0x80/0x4b8
vfs_fsync_range+0x64/0xc0
SyS_msync+0x194/0x1e8This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that READ_ONCE is used before the initial checks on the pmd, and this value is subsequently used when checking whether or not the pmd is present. pmd_check is removed and the pmd_present check is inlined directly.
mm/page_vma_mapped.c +10 -15
@@ -6,17 +6,6 @@#include "internal.h" -static inline bool check_pmd (struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw) -{ -pmd_t pmde; -/* -* Make sure we don't re-load pmd between present and !trans_huge check. -* We need a consistent view. -*/ - pmde =READ_ONCE (*pvmw->pmd); -return pmd_present (pmde) && !pmd_trans_huge (pmde); -} -static inline bool not_found (struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw) {page_vma_mapped_walk_done (pvmw);
@@ -116,6 +105,7 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)pgd_t *pgd;p4d_t *p4d;pud_t *pud; +pmd_t pmde;/* The only possible pmd mapping has been handled on last iteration */ if (pvmw->pmd && !pvmw->pte)
@@ -148,7 +138,13 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)if (!pud_present (*pud))return false; pvmw->pmd =pmd_offset (pud, pvmw->address); -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pvmw->pmd) ||is_pmd_migration_entry (*pvmw->pmd)) { +/* +* Make sure the pmd value isn't cached in a register by the +* compiler and used as a stale value after we've observed a +* subsequent update. +*/ + pmde =READ_ONCE (*pvmw->pmd); +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmde) ||is_pmd_migration_entry (pmde)) { pvmw->ptl =pmd_lock (mm, pvmw->pmd);if (likely (pmd_trans_huge (*pvmw->pmd))) {if (pvmw->flags &PVMW_MIGRATION )
@@ -174,9 +170,8 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)spin_unlock (pvmw->ptl); pvmw->ptl =NULL ; } - }else { -if (!check_pmd (pvmw)) -return false; + }else if (!pmd_present (pmde)) { +return false; }if (!map_pte (pvmw)) goto next_pte;
Quoted 5 lines · On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 03:40:33PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.13-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Just to save anybody else from backporting this, I submitted a version for 4.13 just now:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/17/380
Will