drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
PATCH 1/1 drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Correcting error handing for qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning there are no free buffers for allocation.
--- drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c +1 -1
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int ldpaa_eth_tx(struct eth_device *net_dev, void *buf, int len) &buffer_start, 1); }while (err == -EBUSY ); -if (err <0 ) { +if (err <=0 ) {printf ("qbman_swp_acquire() failed\n" );return -ENOMEM ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH 1/1 drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Quoted 16 lines · Ashish Kumar
Correcting error handing for
qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning there are no free buffers for allocation.Signed-off-by Ashish Kumar <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kushwaha Prabhakar <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c +0
-0
drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c static int ldpaa_eth_tx(struct eth_device *net_dev, void *buf, int len) · line 340
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c +1
-1@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int ldpaa_eth_tx(struct eth_device *net_dev, void *buf, int len) &buffer_start, 1); }while (err == -EBUSY ); -if (err <0 ) { +if (err <=0 ) {printf ("qbman_swp_acquire() failed\n" );return -ENOMEM ; }
Since you already check for errors in qbman_swp_acquire(), would it be better to check if "num" is zero there?
York
PATCH 1/1 drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Hello York,
The definition of qbman_swp_acquire(), is not owned by u-boot, it is part of qbman drivers which is owned by Roy. u-boot gets this definition from flib code and same is used in u-boot as it is.
So, moving this error handler in qbman_swp_acquire for num == 0, may result in inconsistency in flib code that was provided at the time of integration.
Please suggest.
Regards
Ashish
-----Original Message-----
From: York Sun
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 8:49 PM
To: Ashish Kumar <[email protected]>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
Cc: joe.hershberger at gmail.com; Kushwaha Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Quoted 17 lines · Ashish Kumar
Correcting error handing for
qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning there are no free buffers for allocation.Signed-off-by Ashish Kumar <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kushwaha Prabhakar <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c +0
-0
drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c static int ldpaa_eth_tx(struct eth_device *net_dev, void *buf, int len) · line 340
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c +1
-1@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int ldpaa_eth_tx(struct eth_device *net_dev, void *buf, int len) &buffer_start, 1); }while (err == -EBUSY ); -if (err <0 ) { +if (err <=0 ) {printf ("qbman_swp_acquire() failed\n" );return -ENOMEM ; }
Since you already check for errors in qbman_swp_acquire(), would it be better to check if "num" is zero there?
York
PATCH 1/1 drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Quoted 7 lines · Ashish Kumar
Hello York,
The definition of
qbman_swp_acquire(), is not owned by u-boot, it is part of qbman drivers which is owned by Roy. u-boot gets this definition from flib code and same is used in u-boot as it is.So, moving this error handler in
qbman_swp_acquirefor num == 0, may result in inconsistency in flib code that was provided at the time of integration.
OK. Let's keep it that way.
BTW, please do not top post if you can avoid it. Please always use common quotation style when you reply.
York
PATCH 1/1 drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Please see inline.
-----Original Message-----
From: York Sun
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:32 AM
To: Ashish Kumar <[email protected]>; Roy Pledge <[email protected]>
Cc: joe.hershberger at gmail.com; Prabhakar Kushwaha <[email protected]>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
Quoted 7 lines · Ashish Kumar
Hello York,
The definition of
qbman_swp_acquire(), is not owned by u-boot, it is part of qbman drivers which is owned by Roy. u-boot gets this definition from flib code and same is used in u-boot as it is.So, moving this error handler in
qbman_swp_acquirefor num == 0, may result in inconsistency in flib code that was provided at the time of integration.
OK. Let's keep it that way.
BTW, please do not top post if you can avoid it. Please always use common quotation style when you reply.
Sure, I will take care.
York
York Sun
AppliedPATCH 1/1 drivers: net: ldpaa_eth: Correct error handler for qbman_swp_acquire()
In reply to Ashish KumarQuoted 7 lines · Ashish Kumar
Correcting error handing for
qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning there are no free buffers for allocation.Signed-off-by Ashish Kumar <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kushwaha Prabhakar <[email protected]>---
Applied to fsl-qoriq master. Thanks.
York