Patch "ext4: fix stripe-unaligned allocations" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: fix stripe-unaligned allocations
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-stripe-unaligned-allocations.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From foo@baz Mon Nov 6 10:22:56 CET 2017
From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 22:37:45 +0000
Subject: ext4: fix stripe-unaligned allocations
From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit d9b22cf9f5466a057f2a4f1e642b469fa9d73117 ]
When a filesystem is created using:
mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -E stride=512 <dev>
and we try to allocate 64MB extent, we will end up directly in ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(). This is because the request is detected as power-of-two allocation (so we start in ext4_mb_regular_allocator() with ac_criteria == 0) however the check before ext4_mb_simple_scan_group() refuses the direct buddy scan because the allocation request is too large. Since cr == 0, the check whether we should use ext4_mb_scan_aligned() fails as well and we fall back to ext4_mb_complex_scan_group().
Fix the problem by checking for upper limit on power-of-two requests directly when detecting them.
--- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/mballoc.c +4 -2
@@ -2136,8 +2136,10 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_al* We search using buddy data only if the order of the request * is greater than equal to the sbi_s_mb_order2_reqs * You can tune it via /sys/fs/ext4/<partition>/mb_order2_req +* We also support searching for power-of-two requests only for +* requests upto maximum buddy size we have constructed. */ -if (i >= sbi->s_mb_order2_reqs) { +if (i >= sbi->s_mb_order2_reqs && i <= sb->s_blocksize_bits +2 ) {/* * This should tell if fe_len is exactly power of 2 */
@@ -2207,7 +2209,7 @@ repeat: } ac->ac_groups_scanned++; -if (cr ==0 && ac->ac_2order < sb->s_blocksize_bits+2 ) +if (cr ==0 )ext4_mb_simple_scan_group (ac, &e4b);else if (cr ==1 && sbi->s_stripe && !(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % sbi->s_stripe))
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.4/ext4-fix-stripe-unaligned-allocations.patch queue-4.4/ext4-do-not-use-stripe_width-if-it-is-not-set.patch