Patch "nfs: Don't take a reference on fl->fl_file for LOCK operation" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
nfs: Don't take a reference on fl->fl_file for LOCK operation
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfs-don-t-take-a-reference-on-fl-fl_file-for-lock-operation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From foo@baz Tue Dec 5 18:18:39 CET 2017
From: Benjamin Coddington <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:20:16 -0500
Subject: nfs: Don't take a reference on fl->fl_file for LOCK operation
From: Benjamin Coddington <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 4b09ec4b14a168bf2c687e1f598140c3c11e9222 ]
I have reports of a crash that look like __fput() was called twice for a NFSv4.0 file. It seems possible that the state manager could try to reclaim a lock and take a reference on the fl->fl_file at the same time the file is being released if, during the close(), a signal interrupts the wait for outstanding IO while removing locks which then skips the removal of that lock.
Since 83bfff23e9ed ("nfs4: have do_vfs_lock take an inode pointer") has removed the need to traverse fl->fl_file->f_inode in nfs4_lock_done(), taking that reference is no longer necessary.
--- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +0 -3
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@#include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/errno.h> -#include <linux/file.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/ratelimit.h> #include <linux/printk.h>
@@ -5544,7 +5543,6 @@ static struct nfs4_lockdata *nfs4_alloc_ p->server = server;atomic_inc (&lsp->ls_count); p->ctx =get_nfs_open_context (ctx); -get_file (fl->fl_file);memcpy (&p->fl, fl,sizeof (p->fl));return p; out_free_seqid:
@@ -5634,7 +5632,6 @@ static void nfs4_lock_release(void *callnfs_free_seqid (data->arg.lock_seqid);nfs4_put_lock_state (data->lsp);put_nfs_open_context (data->ctx); -fput (data->fl.fl_file);kfree (data);dprintk ("%s: done!\n" , __func__); }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-3.18/nfs-don-t-take-a-reference-on-fl-fl_file-for-lock-operation.patch