binutils: update to 2.29.1

similarity index 97%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.inc
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.1.inc
index 27d46eb088..d92bbbce5d 100644
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ BINUPV = "${@binutils_branch_version(d)}"
 
 UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "binutils-(?P<pver>\d+_(\d_?)*)"
 
-SRCREV = "37e991bb143ca2106330bcdc625590d53838b7a1"
+SRCREV = "90276f15379d380761fc499da2ba24cfb3c12a94"
 SRC_URI = "\
      git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git;branch=binutils-${BINUPV}-branch;protocol=git \
      file://0003-configure-widen-the-regexp-for-SH-architectures.patch \

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross-canadian_2.29.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross-canadian_2.29.1.bb

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross_2.29.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross_2.29.1.bb

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-crosssdk_2.29.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-crosssdk_2.29.1.bb

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.29.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.29.1.bb

index d92bbbce5d..07a72e2b5a 100644
@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ BINUPV = "${@binutils_branch_version(d)}"
 
 UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "binutils-(?P<pver>\d+_(\d_?)*)"
 
-SRCREV = "90276f15379d380761fc499da2ba24cfb3c12a94"
+SRCREV ?= "90276f15379d380761fc499da2ba24cfb3c12a94"
+BINUTILS_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git;branch=binutils-${BINUPV}-branch;protocol=git"
 SRC_URI = "\
-     git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git;branch=binutils-${BINUPV}-branch;protocol=git \
+     ${BINUTILS_GIT_URI} \
      file://0003-configure-widen-the-regexp-for-SH-architectures.patch \
      file://0004-Point-scripts-location-to-libdir.patch \
      file://0005-Only-generate-an-RPATH-entry-if-LD_RUN_PATH-is-not-e.patch \

similarity index 88%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-8.0.inc
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-8.0.1.inc
index fba32ce12c..04a1c809db 100644
@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ SRC_URI = "http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/gdb-${PV}.tar.xz \
            file://0010-resolve-restrict-keyword-conflict.patch \
            file://package_devel_gdb_patches_120-sigprocmask-invalid-call.patch \
 "
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c3d35cd949084be53b92cc1e03485f88"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "f6a24ffe4917e67014ef9273eb8b547cb96a13e5ca74895b06d683b391f3f4ee"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "48cac527e6f3018b865ece021e9723ac"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "3dbd5f93e36ba2815ad0efab030dcd0c7b211d7b353a40a53f4c02d7d56295e3"
 

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian_8.0.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian_8.0.1.bb

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross_8.0.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross_8.0.1.bb

similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb_8.0.bb
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb_8.0.1.bb

index 37e996afb7..03f2bf045d 100644
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
 BACKPORTS = "\
            file://CVE-2016-6131.patch \
            file://0057-ARM-PR-82445-suppress-32-bit-aligned-ldrd-strd-peeph.patch \
+           file://0001-enable-FL_LPAE-flag-for-armv7ve-cores.patch \
 "
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = "11ba51a0cfb8471927f387c8895fe232"
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "850bf21eafdfe5cd5f6827148184c08c4a0852a37ccf36ce69855334d2c914d4"

67 lines not on this page · raw message

index 56c9d7fe17..9af1172ae0 100644
@@ -26,3 +26,8 @@ INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "dev-so"
 # Doesn't compile in MIPS16e mode due to use of hand-written
 # assembly
 MIPS_INSTRUCTION_SET = "mips"
+
+# thumb1 is unsupported
+ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"
+ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"
+

index 932c9a27a0..edfaa07eee 100644
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 require musl.inc
 
-SRCREV = "eb03bde2f24582874cb72b56c7811bf51da0c817"
+SRCREV = "4000b0107ddd7fe733fa31d4f078c6fcd35851d6"
 
 PV = "1.1.18+git${SRCPV}"
 

deleted file mode 100644
index b2bb96b818..0000000000
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-From 037283cbc74739b72f36dfec827d120faa243406 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:50:55 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 26/26] assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement
- expression [BZ# 21242]
-
-On 07/05/2017 10:15 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
-> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote:
->> On 07/05/2017 05:46 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
->>> A problem occurs to me: expressions involving VLAs _are_ evaluated
->>> inside sizeof.
->>
->> The type of the sizeof argument would still be int (due to the
->> comparison against 0), so this doesn't actually occur.
->
-> I rechecked what C99 says about sizeof and VLAs, and you're right -
-> the operand of sizeof is only evaluated when sizeof is _directly_
-> applied to a VLA.  So this is indeed safe, but I think this wrinkle
-> should be mentioned in the comment.  Perhaps
->
-> /* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
->    but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
->    for the second occurrence.  The explicit comparison against zero
->    ensures that sizeof is not directly applied to a function pointer or
->    bit-field (which would be ill-formed) or VLA (which would be evaluated).  */
->
-> zw
-
-What about the attached patch?
-
-Siddhesh, is this okay during the freeze?  I'd like to backport it to
-2.25 as well.
-
-Thanks,
-Florian
-
-assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement expression
-
-2017-07-06  Florian Weimer  <[email protected]>
-
-	[BZ #21242]
-	* assert/assert.h [__GNUC__ && !__STRICT_ANSI__] (assert):
-	Suppress pedantic warning resulting from statement expression.
-	(__ASSERT_FUNCTION): Add missing __extendsion__.
----
-
-Upstream-Status: Submitted
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
-
- assert/assert.h | 12 +++++++++---
- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/assert/assert.h b/assert/assert.h
-index 22f019537c..6801cfeb10 100644
---- a/assert/assert.h
-+++ b/assert/assert.h
-@@ -91,13 +91,19 @@ __END_DECLS
-      ? __ASSERT_VOID_CAST (0)						\
-      : __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION))
- # else
-+/* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
-+   but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
-+   for the second occurrence.  The explicit comparison against zero is
-+   required to support function pointers and bit fields in this
-+   context, and to suppress the evaluation of variable length
-+   arrays.  */
- #  define assert(expr)							\
--    ({									\
-+  ((void) sizeof ((expr) == 0), __extension__ ({			\
-       if (expr)								\
-         ; /* empty */							\
-       else								\
-         __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION);	\
--    })
-+    }))
- # endif
- 
- # ifdef	__USE_GNU
-@@ -113,7 +119,7 @@ __END_DECLS
-    C9x has a similar variable called __func__, but prefer the GCC one since
-    it demangles C++ function names.  */
- # if defined __cplusplus ? __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 6) : __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 4)
--#   define __ASSERT_FUNCTION	__PRETTY_FUNCTION__
-+#   define __ASSERT_FUNCTION	__extension__ __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
- # else
- #  if defined __STDC_VERSION__ && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L
- #   define __ASSERT_FUNCTION	__func__
--- 
-2.13.3
-

index 135ec4fb16..5213a6a942 100644
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSES;md5=e9a558e243b36d3209f380deb394b213 \
 
 DEPENDS += "gperf-native"
 
-SRCREV ?= "1c9a5c270d8b66f30dcfaf1cb2d6cf39d3e18369"
+SRCREV ?= "77f921dac17c5fa99bd9e926d926c327982895f7"
 
 SRCBRANCH ?= "release/${PV}/master"
 

@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ SRC_URI = "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc \
            file://0023-Define-DUMMY_LOCALE_T-if-not-defined.patch \
            file://0024-elf-dl-deps.c-Make-_dl_build_local_scope-breadth-fir.patch \
            file://0025-locale-fix-hard-coded-reference-to-gcc-E.patch \
-           file://0026-assert-Suppress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch \
            file://0027-glibc-reset-dl-load-write-lock-after-forking.patch \
            file://0028-Bug-4578-add-ld.so-lock-while-fork.patch \
 "

index 1d40cba731..baf98aeba8 100644
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
            file://0048-gcc-Enable-static-PIE.patch \
            file://fix-segmentation-fault-precompiled-hdr.patch \
            file://0050-RISC-V-Handle-non-legitimate-address-in-riscv_legiti.patch \
+           file://0051-Fix-gfortran-build.patch \
            ${BACKPORTS} \
 "
 BACKPORTS = "\

53 lines not on this page · raw message

index 03f2bf045d..a191fd70a3 100644
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
            file://0054_all_nopie-all-flags.patch \
            file://0055-unwind_h-glibc26.patch \
            file://0056-LRA-PR70904-relax-the-restriction-on-subreg-reload-f.patch \
+           file://0057-Fix-gfortran-build.patch \
            ${BACKPORTS} \
 "
 BACKPORTS = "\

53 lines not on this page · raw message