Patch "x86/mm, sched/core: Uninline switch_mm()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

@@ -104,103 +104,9 @@ static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
-			     struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
+extern void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
+		      struct task_struct *tsk);
 
-	if (likely(prev != next)) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-		this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
-		this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm, next);
-#endif
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
-
-		/*
-		 * Re-load page tables.
-		 *
-		 * This logic has an ordering constraint:
-		 *
-		 *  CPU 0: Write to a PTE for 'next'
-		 *  CPU 0: load bit 1 in mm_cpumask.  if nonzero, send IPI.
-		 *  CPU 1: set bit 1 in next's mm_cpumask
-		 *  CPU 1: load from the PTE that CPU 0 writes (implicit)
-		 *
-		 * We need to prevent an outcome in which CPU 1 observes
-		 * the new PTE value and CPU 0 observes bit 1 clear in
-		 * mm_cpumask.  (If that occurs, then the IPI will never
-		 * be sent, and CPU 0's TLB will contain a stale entry.)
-		 *
-		 * The bad outcome can occur if either CPU's load is
-		 * reordered before that CPU's store, so both CPUs must
-		 * execute full barriers to prevent this from happening.
-		 *
-		 * Thus, switch_mm needs a full barrier between the
-		 * store to mm_cpumask and any operation that could load
-		 * from next->pgd.  TLB fills are special and can happen
-		 * due to instruction fetches or for no reason at all,
-		 * and neither LOCK nor MFENCE orders them.
-		 * Fortunately, load_cr3() is serializing and gives the
-		 * ordering guarantee we need.
-		 *
-		 */
-		load_cr3(next->pgd);
-
-		trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
-
-		/* Stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
-
-		/* Load per-mm CR4 state */
-		load_mm_cr4(next);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_MODIFY_LDT_SYSCALL
-		/*
-		 * Load the LDT, if the LDT is different.
-		 *
-		 * It's possible that prev->context.ldt doesn't match
-		 * the LDT register.  This can happen if leave_mm(prev)
-		 * was called and then modify_ldt changed
-		 * prev->context.ldt but suppressed an IPI to this CPU.
-		 * In this case, prev->context.ldt != NULL, because we
-		 * never set context.ldt to NULL while the mm still
-		 * exists.  That means that next->context.ldt !=
-		 * prev->context.ldt, because mms never share an LDT.
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(prev->context.ldt != next->context.ldt))
-			load_mm_ldt(next);
-#endif
-	}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	  else {
-		this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
-		BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm) != next);
-
-		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) {
-			/*
-			 * On established mms, the mm_cpumask is only changed
-			 * from irq context, from ptep_clear_flush() while in
-			 * lazy tlb mode, and here. Irqs are blocked during
-			 * schedule, protecting us from simultaneous changes.
-			 */
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
-
-			/*
-			 * We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled
-			 * tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload CR3
-			 * to make sure to use no freed page tables.
-			 *
-			 * As above, load_cr3() is serializing and orders TLB
-			 * fills with respect to the mm_cpumask write.
-			 */
-			load_cr3(next->pgd);
-			trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
-			load_mm_cr4(next);
-			load_mm_ldt(next);
-		}
-	}
-#endif
-}
 
 #define activate_mm(prev, next)			\
 do {						\

108 lines not on this page · raw message