recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable
PATCH 1/1 recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable
When an underlying recvmsg call fails after at least one message has been received, recvmmsg stores the error code into sock->sk->sk_err, and returns it on a subsequent call. But it doesn't take into account that the error can be owerwritten in the meantime, for example in ICMP error handler when an ICMP packet arrives.
When an underlying sendmsg call fails after at least one message has been sent, sendmmsg discards the error code and expects the caller to retry at first failed message. But the error code returned from the subsqeuent call can be different from the previously discarded one.
Reference:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/net/socket.c
--- man2/recvmmsg.2 | 12 ++++++++++++ man2/sendmmsg.2 | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
man2/recvmmsg.2 +12 -0
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ In addition, the following error can occur: .B EINVAL .I timeout is invalid. +.PP +See also BUGS. .SH VERSIONS The .BR recvmmsg ()
@@ -179,6 +181,16 @@ so that if up to .I vlen\-1 datagrams are received before the timeout expires, but then no further datagrams are received, the call will block forever. +.PP +If an error occurs on an underlying +.BR recvmsg (2) +call after at least one message has been received, the call succeeds, +and returns the number of messages received. The error code is expected +to be returned on a subsequent call to +.BR recvmmsq (). +However, in the current implementation the error code can be overwritten +in the meantime by an unrelated network event on a socket, +for example an incoming ICMP packet. .SH EXAMPLE .PP The following program uses
man2/sendmmsg.2 +8 -0
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ is set to indicate the error. Errors are as for .BR sendmsg (2). An error is returned only if no datagrams could be sent. +See also BUGS. .\" commit 728ffb86f10873aaf4abd26dde691ee40ae731fe .\" ... only return an error if no datagrams could be sent. .\" If less than the requested number of messages were sent, the application
@@ -165,6 +166,13 @@ is capped to .\" For error handling an application using sendmmsg needs to retry at .\" the first unsent message, so capping is simpler and requires less .\" application logic than returning EINVAL. +.SH BUGS +If an error occurs on an underlying +.BR sendmsg (2) +call after at least one message has been sent, the call succeeds, +and returns the number of messages sent. The error code is lost. +The caller can retry starting at first failed message, but there is +no guarantee that the error returned will be the same as the previous one. .SH EXAMPLE The example below uses .BR sendmmsg ()
Signature · 6 lines
2.13.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Hello,
any objections against the patch?
Quoted 66 lines · Nikola Forró
When an underlying recvmsg call fails after at least one message has been received, recvmmsg stores the error code into
sock->sk->sk_err, and returns it on a subsequent call. But it doesn't take into account that the error can be owerwritten in the meantime, for example in ICMP error handler when an ICMP packet arrives.When an underlying sendmsg call fails after at least one message has been sent, sendmmsg discards the error code and expects the caller to retry at first failed message. But the error code returned from the subsqeuent call can be different from the previously discarded one.
Reference:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/net/socket.cSigned-off-by Nikola Forró <[email protected]>--- man2/recvmmsg.2 | 12 ++++++++++++ man2/sendmmsg.2 | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)man2/recvmmsg.2 +12
-0@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ In addition, the following error can occur: .B EINVAL .I timeout is invalid. +.PP +See also BUGS. .SH VERSIONS The .BR recvmmsg ()@@ -179,6 +181,16 @@ so that if up to .I vlen\-1 datagrams are received before the timeout expires, but then no further datagrams are received, the call will block forever. +.PP +If an error occurs on an underlying +.BR recvmsg (2) +call after at least one message has been received, the call succeeds, +and returns the number of messages received. The error code is expected +to be returned on a subsequent call to +.BR recvmmsq (). +However, in the current implementation the error code can be overwritten +in the meantime by an unrelated network event on a socket, +for example an incoming ICMP packet. .SH EXAMPLE .PP The following program usesman2/sendmmsg.2 +1
-0@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ is set to indicate the error. Errors are as for .BR sendmsg (2). An error is returned only if no datagrams could be sent. +See also BUGS. .\" commit 728ffb86f10873aaf4abd26dde691ee40ae731fe .\" ... only return an error if no datagrams could be sent. .\" If less than the requested number of messages were sent, the application@@ -165,6 +166,13 @@ is capped to .\" For error handling an application using sendmmsg needs to retry at .\" the first unsent message, so capping is simpler and requires less .\" application logic than returning EINVAL.
man2/sendmmsg.2 is capped to · line 178
Quoted 10 lines
man2/sendmmsg.2 +7
-0+.SH BUGS +If an error occurs on an underlying +.BR sendmsg (2) +call after at least one message has been sent, the call succeeds, +and returns the number of messages sent. The error code is lost. +The caller can retry starting at first failed message, but there is +no guarantee that the error returned will be the same as the previous one. .SH EXAMPLE The example below uses .BR sendmmsg ()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Nicolas,
My apologies for the slow follow-up. See some comments below.
Quoted 34 lines · Nikola Forró
When an underlying recvmsg call fails after at least one message has been received, recvmmsg stores the error code into
sock->sk->sk_err, and returns it on a subsequent call. But it doesn't take into account that the error can be owerwritten in the meantime, for example in ICMP error handler when an ICMP packet arrives.When an underlying sendmsg call fails after at least one message has been sent, sendmmsg discards the error code and expects the caller to retry at first failed message. But the error code returned from the subsqeuent call can be different from the previously discarded one.
Reference:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/net/socket.cSigned-off-by Nikola Forró <[email protected]>--- man2/recvmmsg.2 | 12 ++++++++++++ man2/sendmmsg.2 | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)man2/recvmmsg.2 +2
-0@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ In addition, the following error can occur: .B EINVAL .I timeout is invalid. +.PP +See also BUGS. .SH VERSIONS The .BR recvmmsg ()
man2/recvmmsg.2 so that if up to · line 187
Quoted 7 lines
man2/recvmmsg.2 +4
-0@@ -179,6 +181,16 @@ so that if up to .I vlen\-1 datagrams are received before the timeout expires, but then no further datagrams are received, the call will block forever. +.PP +If an error occurs on an underlying +.BR recvmsg (2) +call after at least one message has been received, the call succeeds,
There is not an underlying system call as such. (I mean: one system call is not calling another system call.) Therefore, I think it would be better to write the preceding as:
If an error occurs after at least one message has been received, the call succeeds,
Quoted 22 lines
man2/recvmmsg.2 +6
-0+and returns the number of messages received. The error code is expected +to be returned on a subsequent call to +.BR recvmmsq (). +However, in the current implementation the error code can be overwritten +in the meantime by an unrelated network event on a socket, +for example an incoming ICMP packet. .SH EXAMPLE .PP The following program usesman2/sendmmsg.2 +1
-0@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ is set to indicate the error. Errors are as for .BR sendmsg (2). An error is returned only if no datagrams could be sent. +See also BUGS. .\" commit 728ffb86f10873aaf4abd26dde691ee40ae731fe .\" ... only return an error if no datagrams could be sent. .\" If less than the requested number of messages were sent, the application
man2/sendmmsg.2 is capped to · line 172
Quoted 7 lines
man2/sendmmsg.2 +4
-0@@ -165,6 +166,13 @@ is capped to .\" For error handling an application using sendmmsg needs to retry at .\" the first unsent message, so capping is simpler and requires less .\" application logic than returning EINVAL. +.SH BUGS +If an error occurs on an underlying +.BR sendmsg (2) +call after at least one message has been sent, the call succeeds,
See my previous comment.
man2/sendmmsg.2 is capped to · line 175
Quoted 3 lines
man2/sendmmsg.2 +3
-0+and returns the number of messages sent. The error code is lost. +The caller can retry starting at first failed message, but there is +no guarantee that the error returned will be the same as the previous one.
I am not sure that I understand that last sentence. Do you mean something like:
The caller can retry the transmission, starting at first failed message, but there is no guarantee that, if an error is returned, it will be the same error as the one that was lost on the previous call.
?
Thanks,
Michael
Signature · 7 lines
Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 69ba335d-c0d4-d032-6d92-1467214653cb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Quoted 9 lines · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
I am not sure that I understand that last sentence. Do you mean something like:
The caller can retry the transmission, starting at first failed message, but there is no guarantee that, if an error is returned, it will be the same error as the one that was lost on the previous call.
?
Hello Michael,
yes, that's exactly what I meant. I'll update and re-send the patch.
Thanks,
Nikola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html