Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Mar 25, 2018

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
nfsd-remove-blocked-locks-on-client-teardown.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 68ef3bc3166468678d5e1fdd216628c35bd1186f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:32:02 -0400
Subject: nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown

From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

commit 68ef3bc3166468678d5e1fdd216628c35bd1186f upstream.

We had some reports of panics in nfsd4_lm_notify, and that showed a nfs4_lockowner that had outlived its so_client.

Ensure that we walk any leftover lockowners after tearing down all of the stateids, and remove any blocked locks that they hold.

With this change, we also don't need to walk the nbl_lru on nfsd_net shutdown, as that will happen naturally when we tear down the clients.

Fixes 76d348fadff5 (nfsd: have nfsd4_lock use blocking locks for v4.1+ locks)
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +43 -19
@@ -263,6 +263,35 @@ free_blocked_lock(struct nfsd4_blocked_l
 	kfree(nbl);
 }
 
+static void
+remove_blocked_locks(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
+{
+	struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
+	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
+	struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
+	LIST_HEAD(reaplist);
+
+	/* Dequeue all blocked locks */
+	spin_lock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
+	while (!list_empty(&lo->lo_blocked)) {
+		nbl = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_blocked,
+					struct nfsd4_blocked_lock,
+					nbl_list);
+		list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_list);
+		list_move(&nbl->nbl_lru, &reaplist);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
+
+	/* Now free them */
+	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+		nbl = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct nfsd4_blocked_lock,
+					nbl_lru);
+		list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
+		posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
+		free_blocked_lock(nbl);
+	}
+}
+
 static int
 nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct rpc_task *task)
 {
@@ -1854,6 +1883,7 @@ static __be32 mark_client_expired_locked
 static void
 __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
 {
+	int i;
 	struct nfs4_openowner *oo;
 	struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
 	struct list_head reaplist;
@@ -1883,6 +1913,16 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp
 		nfs4_get_stateowner(&oo->oo_owner);
 		release_openowner(oo);
 	}
+	for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+		struct nfs4_stateowner *so, *tmp;
+
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(so, tmp, &clp->cl_ownerstr_hashtbl[i],
+					 so_strhash) {
+			/* Should be no openowners at this point */
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(so->so_is_open_owner);
+			remove_blocked_locks(lockowner(so));
+		}
+	}
 	nfsd4_return_all_client_layouts(clp);
 	nfsd4_shutdown_callback(clp);
 	if (clp->cl_cb_conn.cb_xprt)
@@ -6275,6 +6315,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 	free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
+	remove_blocked_locks(lo);
 	nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
 
 	return status;
@@ -7060,6 +7101,8 @@ nfs4_state_destroy_net(struct net *net)
 		}
 	}
 
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nn->blocked_locks_lru));
+
 	for (i = 0; i < CLIENT_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
 		while (!list_empty(&nn->unconf_id_hashtbl[i])) {
 			clp = list_entry(nn->unconf_id_hashtbl[i].next, struct nfs4_client, cl_idhash);
@@ -7126,7 +7169,6 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
 	struct nfs4_delegation *dp = NULL;
 	struct list_head *pos, *next, reaplist;
 	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
-	struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
 
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&nn->laundromat_work);
 	locks_end_grace(&nn->nfsd4_manager);
@@ -7147,24 +7189,6 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
 		nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
 	}
 
-	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&reaplist));
-	spin_lock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
-	while (!list_empty(&nn->blocked_locks_lru)) {
-		nbl = list_first_entry(&nn->blocked_locks_lru,
-					struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
-		list_move(&nbl->nbl_lru, &reaplist);
-		list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_list);
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
-
-	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
-		nbl = list_first_entry(&reaplist,
-					struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
-		list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
-		posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
-		free_blocked_lock(nbl);
-	}
-
 	nfsd4_client_tracking_exit(net);
 	nfs4_state_destroy_net(net);
 }

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.14/nfsd-remove-blocked-locks-on-client-teardown.patch