Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "USB: ene_usb6250: fix first command execution" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Apr 9, 2018

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

USB: ene_usb6250: fix first command execution

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
usb-ene_usb6250-fix-first-command-execution.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 17:09:24 CEST 2018

From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 11:47:42 -0400
Subject: USB: ene_usb6250: fix first command execution

From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 4b309f1c4972c8f09e03ac64fc63510dbf5591a4 ]

In the ene_usb6250 sub-driver for usb-storage, the ene_transport() routine is supposed to initialize the driver before executing the current command, if the initialization has not already been performed. However, a bug in the routine causes it to skip the command after doing the initialization. Also, the routine does not return an appropriate error code if either the initialization or the command fails.

As a result of the first bug, the first command (a SCSI INQUIRY) is not carried out. The results can be seen in the system log, in the form of a warning message and empty or garbage INQUIRY data:

Apr 18 22:40:08 notebook2 kernel: scsi host6: scsi scan: INQUIRY result too short (5), using 36
Apr 18 22:40:08 notebook2 kernel: scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access                                    PQ: 0 ANSI: 0

This patch fixes both errors.

---
 drivers/usb/storage/ene_ub6250.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/ene_ub6250.c +5 -4
@@ -2295,21 +2295,22 @@ static int ms_scsi_irp(struct us_data *u
 
 static int ene_transport(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct us_data *us)
 {
-	int result = 0;
+	int result = USB_STOR_XFER_GOOD;
 	struct ene_ub6250_info *info = (struct ene_ub6250_info *)(us->extra);
 
 	/*US_DEBUG(usb_stor_show_command(us, srb)); */
 	scsi_set_resid(srb, 0);
-	if (unlikely(!(info->SD_Status.Ready || info->MS_Status.Ready))) {
+	if (unlikely(!(info->SD_Status.Ready || info->MS_Status.Ready)))
 		result = ene_init(us);
-	} else {
+	if (result == USB_STOR_XFER_GOOD) {
+		result = USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_ERROR;
 		if (info->SD_Status.Ready)
 			result = sd_scsi_irp(us, srb);
 
 		if (info->MS_Status.Ready)
 			result = ms_scsi_irp(us, srb);
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return result;
 }
 
 static struct scsi_host_template ene_ub6250_host_template;

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.9/usb-ene_usb6250-fix-first-command-execution.patch queue-4.9/usb-ene_usb6250-fix-scsi-residue-overwriting.patch