Add multi-channel and overheat IRQ support to Armada thermal driver
Subsystems (4)
Miquel Raynal
maintainercover Add multi-channel and overheat IRQ support to Armada thermal driver
The only capability of the Armada thermal driver is currently just to read one sensor (the default one) per AP and one per CP.
Actually, there is one sensor per core in the AP806 plus one sensor in the thermal IP itself. The CP110 just features one thermal sensor in its own thermal IP.
Also, there is no need for the thermal core to poll the temperature of each sensor by software as this IP (at least for AP806 and CP110 compatibles) features an hardware overheat interrupt.
This series first improves the readability of this driver, then adds support for multi-channel thermal IPs, and finally adds support for the hardware overheat interrupt. The bindings and the device-trees are updated accordingly.
Please note that the thermal IP raises SEI interrupts, from which the support as just been contributed and not merged yet. Applying the last DT patches referring to the 'sei' and 'icu_sei' nodes will require this feature [1] to have been accepted first.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-April/572852.html
Thank you,
Miqu?l
Miquel Raynal (27):
thermal: armada: add a function that sanitizes the thermal zone name
thermal: armada: remove useless register accesses
thermal: armada: remove misleading comments
thermal: armada: rename the initialization routine
thermal: armada: dissociate a380 and cp110 ->init() hooks
thermal: armada: average over samples to avoid glitches
thermal: armada: convert driver to syscon register accesses
thermal: armada: use the resource managed registration helper
alternative
thermal: armada: add multi-channel sensors support
thermal: armada: remove sensors validity from the IP initialization
thermal: armada: move validity check out of the read function
thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer
thermal: armada: add overheat interrupt support
dt-bindings: cp110: rename cp110 syscon file
dt-bindings: ap806: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
nodes
dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
nodes
dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
dt-bindings: cp110: update documentation since DT de-duplication
dt-bindings: cp110: add the thermal node in the syscon file
dt-bindings: thermal: armada: add reference to new bindings
arm64: dts: marvell: rename ap806 syscon node
arm64: dts: marvell: move AP806/CP110 thermal nodes into a new syscon
arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in ap806 DTSI file
arm64: dts: marvell: add macro to make distinction between node names
arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in cp110 DTSI file
arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to ap806 thermal node
arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to cp110 thermal node
.../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 55 +-
...controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} | 66 +-
.../devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt | 5 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 85 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 45 +-
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 875 ++++++++++++++++++---
7 files changed, 976 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} (83%)Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 1/27 thermal: armada: add a function that sanitizes the thermal zone name
Thermal zone names must follow certain rules imposed by the framework. They are limited in length and shall not have any hyphen '-'.
This is done in a separate function for future use in another location.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +35 -1
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct armada_thermal_priv {void __iomem *status;void __iomem *control0;void __iomem *control1; +char zone_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ];struct armada_thermal_data *data; };
@@ -353,6 +354,36 @@ static const struct of_device_id armada_thermal_id_table[] = { };MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, armada_thermal_id_table); +static void armada_set_sane_name (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ +const char *name =dev_name (&pdev->dev); +char *insane_char; + +if (strlen (name) >THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ) { +/* +* When inside a system controller, the device name has the +* form: f06f8000.system-controller:ap-thermal so stripping +* after the ':' should give us a shorter but meaningful name. +*/ + name =strrchr (name,':' ); +if (!name) + name ="armada_thermal" ; +else + name++; + } + +/* Save the name locally */ +strncpy (priv->zone_name, name,THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ); + +/* Then check there are no '-' or hwmon core will complain */ +do { + insane_char =strpbrk (priv->zone_name,"-" ); +if (insane_char) + *insane_char ='_' ; + }while (insane_char); +} +static int armada_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) {void __iomem *control =NULL ;
@@ -381,6 +412,9 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->data = (struct armada_thermal_data *)match->data; +/* Ensure device name is correct for the thermal core */ +armada_set_sane_name (pdev, priv); +/* * Legacy DT bindings only described "control1" register (also referred * as "control MSB" on old documentation). New bindings cover
@@ -402,7 +436,7 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->data->init_sensor (pdev, priv); - thermal =thermal_zone_device_register (dev_name (&pdev->dev),0 ,0 , priv, + thermal =thermal_zone_device_register (priv->zone_name,0 ,0 , priv, &ops,NULL ,0 ,0 );if (IS_ERR (thermal)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev,
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 2/27 thermal: armada: remove useless register accesses
In reply to Miquel RaynalPrepare the migration to use regmaps by first simplifying the initialization functions: avoid unnecessary write/read cycles on configuration registers.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +2 -6
@@ -103,16 +103,13 @@ static void armadaxp_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); reg |=PMU_TDC0_OTF_CAL_MASK ; -writel (reg, priv->control1);/* Reference calibration value */ reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_REF_CAL_CNT_MASK ; reg |= (0xf1 <<PMU_TDC0_REF_CAL_CNT_OFFS ); -writel (reg, priv->control1);/* Reset the sensor */ - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); -writel ((reg |PMU_TDC0_SW_RST_MASK ), priv->control1); + reg |=PMU_TDC0_SW_RST_MASK ;writel (reg, priv->control1);
@@ -129,14 +126,13 @@ static void armada370_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); reg |=PMU_TDC0_OTF_CAL_MASK ; -writel (reg, priv->control1);/* Reference calibration value */ reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_REF_CAL_CNT_MASK ; reg |= (0xf1 <<PMU_TDC0_REF_CAL_CNT_OFFS ); -writel (reg, priv->control1); reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_START_CAL_MASK ; +writel (reg, priv->control1);msleep (10 );
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 3/27 thermal: armada: remove misleading comments
In reply to Miquel RaynalOn older versions of this thermal IP, TSEN referred as the internal sensor in the thermal IP while EXT_TSEN referred as sensors outside of this IP, ie in the CPUs most of the time. The bit names in the specifications do not follow this rule anymore, so remove these comments that are misleading.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +0 -2
@@ -51,12 +51,10 @@#define CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_MASK 0x7#define CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_VAL 0x3 -/* TSEN refers to the temperature sensors within the AP */ #define CONTROL0_TSEN_START BIT(0)#define CONTROL0_TSEN_RESET BIT(1)#define CONTROL0_TSEN_ENABLE BIT(2) -/* EXT_TSEN refers to the external temperature sensors, out of the AP */ #define CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_SW_RESET BIT(7)#define CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_HW_RESETn BIT(8)
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 4/27 thermal: armada: rename the initialization routine
In reply to Miquel RaynalCalling a hook ->init_sensor() while what is initialized is the IP itself and not the sensors is misleading. Rename the hook ->init() to avoid any confusion in later work bringing multi-sensors support.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +20 -20
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ struct armada_thermal_priv { };struct armada_thermal_data { -/* Initialize the sensor */ -void (*init_sensor)(struct platform_device *pdev, -struct armada_thermal_priv *); +/* Initialize the thermal IC */ +void (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv);/* Test for a valid sensor value (optional) */ bool (*is_valid)(struct armada_thermal_priv *);
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {bool needs_control0; }; -static void armadaxp_init_sensor (struct platform_device *pdev, -struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +static void armadaxp_init (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg;
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ static void armadaxp_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,writel (reg, priv->status); } -static void armada370_init_sensor (struct platform_device *pdev, -struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +static void armada370_init (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg;
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@ static void armada370_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,msleep (10 ); } -static void armada375_init_sensor (struct platform_device *pdev, -struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +static void armada375_init (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg;
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static void armada_wait_sensor_validity(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); } -static void armada380_init_sensor (struct platform_device *pdev, -struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +static void armada380_init (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1);
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv); } -static void armada_ap806_init_sensor (struct platform_device *pdev, -struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +static void armada_ap806_init (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg;
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device_ops ops = { };static const struct armada_thermal_data armadaxp_data = { - .init_sensor = armadaxp_init_sensor, + .init = armadaxp_init, .temp_shift =10 , .temp_mask =0x1ff , .coef_b =3153000000ULL ,
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armadaxp_data = {static const struct armada_thermal_data armada370_data = { .is_valid = armada_is_valid, - .init_sensor = armada370_init_sensor, + .init = armada370_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (9 ), .temp_shift =10 , .temp_mask =0x1ff ,
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada370_data = {static const struct armada_thermal_data armada375_data = { .is_valid = armada_is_valid, - .init_sensor = armada375_init_sensor, + .init = armada375_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 , .temp_mask =0x1ff ,
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada375_data = {static const struct armada_thermal_data armada380_data = { .is_valid = armada_is_valid, - .init_sensor = armada380_init_sensor, + .init = armada380_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 , .temp_mask =0x3ff ,
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada380_data = {static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { .is_valid = armada_is_valid, - .init_sensor = armada_ap806_init_sensor, + .init = armada_ap806_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (16 ), .temp_shift =0 , .temp_mask =0x3ff ,
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = {static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = { .is_valid = armada_is_valid, - .init_sensor = armada380_init_sensor, + .init = armada380_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 , .temp_mask =0x3ff ,
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->control1 = control +CONTROL1_OFFSET ; } - priv->data->init_sensor (pdev, priv); + priv->data->init (pdev, priv); thermal =thermal_zone_device_register (priv->zone_name,0 ,0 , priv, &ops,NULL ,0 ,0 );
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 5/27 thermal: armada: dissociate a380 and cp110 ->init() hooks
In reply to Miquel RaynalUntil now, Armada 380 and CP110 could share the same ->init() function because their use was identical.
Prepare the support of multi-sensors support and overheat interrupt feature by separating the initialization paths before they actually diverge.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +7 -1
@@ -200,6 +200,12 @@ static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev,armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv); } +static void armada_cp110_init (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ +armada380_init (pdev, priv); +} +static bool armada_is_valid (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg =readl_relaxed (priv->status);
@@ -306,7 +312,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = {static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = { .is_valid = armada_is_valid, - .init = armada380_init, + .init = armada_cp110_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 , .temp_mask =0x3ff ,
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 6/27 thermal: armada: average over samples to avoid glitches
In reply to Miquel RaynalConfigure the sample frequency and number of averaged samples.
This is needed for two reasons:
1/ To be bootloader independent.
2/ To prepare the introduction of multi-sensors support by preventing
inconsistencies when reading temperatures that could be a mean of samples took from different sensors.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +25 -0
@@ -54,7 +54,12 @@#define CONTROL0_TSEN_START BIT(0)#define CONTROL0_TSEN_RESET BIT(1)#define CONTROL0_TSEN_ENABLE BIT(2) +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_AVG_BYPASS BIT(6) +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_SHIFT 24 +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_MAX 0x3 +#define CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_SHIFT 0 +#define CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_MASK 0x7#define CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_SW_RESET BIT(7)#define CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_HW_RESETn BIT(8)
@@ -194,6 +199,13 @@ static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev, reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control0); reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_RESET ; reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_START |CONTROL0_TSEN_ENABLE ; + +/* Sample every ~2ms */ + reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_MAX <<CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_SHIFT ; + +/* Enable average (2 samples by default) */ + reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_AVG_BYPASS ; +writel (reg, priv->control0);/* Wait the sensors to be valid or the core will warn the user */
@@ -203,7 +215,20 @@ static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev,static void armada_cp110_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +u32 reg; +armada380_init (pdev, priv); + +/* Sample every ~2ms */ + reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control0); + reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_MAX <<CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_SHIFT ; +writel (reg, priv->control0); + +/* Average the output value over 2^1 = 2 samples */ + reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); + reg &= ~CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_MASK <<CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_SHIFT ; + reg |=1 <<CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_SHIFT ; +writel (reg, priv->control1); }static bool armada_is_valid (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv)
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 7/27 thermal: armada: convert driver to syscon register accesses
In reply to Miquel RaynalUntil recently, only one register was referenced in MVEBU thermal IP node. Recent changes added a second entry pointing to another register right next to it. We cannot know for sure that we will not have to access other registers. That will be actually the case when overheat interrupt feature will come, where it will be needed to access DFX registers in the same area.
This approach is not scalable so intead of adding consinuously memory areas in the DT (and change de DT bindings, while keeping backward compatibility), move the thermal node into a wider syscon from which it will be possible to also configure the thermal interrupt.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +128 -69
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/thermal.h> #include <linux/iopoll.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> /* Thermal Manager Control and Status Register */ #define PMU_TDC0_SW_RST_MASK (0x1 << 1)
@@ -39,14 +41,6 @@#define A375_READOUT_INVERT BIT(15)#define A375_HW_RESETn BIT(8) -/* Legacy bindings */ -#define LEGACY_CONTROL_MEM_LEN 0x4 - -/* Current bindings with the 2 control registers under the same memory area */ -#define LEGACY_CONTROL1_OFFSET 0x0 -#define CONTROL0_OFFSET 0x0 -#define CONTROL1_OFFSET 0x4 -/* Errata fields */ #define CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_MASK 0x7#define CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_VAL 0x3
@@ -70,9 +64,7 @@ struct armada_thermal_data;/* Marvell EBU Thermal Sensor Dev Structure */ struct armada_thermal_priv { -void __iomem *status; -void __iomem *control0; -void __iomem *control1; +struct regmap *syscon;char zone_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ];struct armada_thermal_data *data; };
@@ -96,15 +88,20 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {unsigned int temp_shift;unsigned int temp_mask;u32 is_valid_bit; -bool needs_control0; + +/* Syscon access */ +unsigned int syscon_control0_off; +unsigned int syscon_control1_off; +unsigned int syscon_status_off; };static void armadaxp_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data;u32 reg; - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); reg |=PMU_TDC0_OTF_CAL_MASK ;/* Reference calibration value */
@@ -114,29 +111,31 @@ static void armadaxp_init(struct platform_device *pdev,/* Reset the sensor */ reg |=PMU_TDC0_SW_RST_MASK ; -writel (reg, priv->control1); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg);/* Enable the sensor */ - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->status); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_status_off, ®); reg &= ~PMU_TM_DISABLE_MASK ; -writel (reg, priv->status); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_status_off, reg); }static void armada370_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data;u32 reg; - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); reg |=PMU_TDC0_OTF_CAL_MASK ;/* Reference calibration value */ reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_REF_CAL_CNT_MASK ; reg |= (0xf1 <<PMU_TDC0_REF_CAL_CNT_OFFS ); +/* Reset the sensor */ reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_START_CAL_MASK ; -writel (reg, priv->control1); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg);msleep (10 ); }
@@ -144,18 +143,20 @@ static void armada370_init(struct platform_device *pdev,static void armada375_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data;u32 reg; - reg =readl (priv->control1); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); reg &= ~(A375_UNIT_CONTROL_MASK <<A375_UNIT_CONTROL_SHIFT ); reg &= ~A375_READOUT_INVERT ; reg &= ~A375_HW_RESETn; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg); -writel (reg, priv->control1);msleep (20 ); reg |= A375_HW_RESETn; -writel (reg, priv->control1); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg); +msleep (50 ); }
@@ -163,29 +164,29 @@ static void armada_wait_sensor_validity(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg; -readl_relaxed_poll_timeout (priv->status, reg, - reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit, -STATUS_POLL_PERIOD_US , -STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT_US ); +regmap_read_poll_timeout (priv->syscon, priv->data->syscon_status_off, + reg, reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit, +STATUS_POLL_PERIOD_US , +STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT_US ); }static void armada380_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { -u32 reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +u32 reg;/* Disable the HW/SW reset */ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); reg |= CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_HW_RESETn; reg &= ~CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_SW_RESET ; -writel (reg, priv->control1); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg);/* Set Tsen Tc Trim to correct default value (errata #132698) */ -if (priv->control0) { - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control0); - reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_MASK ; - reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_VAL ; -writel (reg, priv->control0); - } +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, ®); + reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_MASK ; + reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_VAL ; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, reg);/* Wait the sensors to be valid or the core will warn the user */ armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv);
@@ -194,9 +195,10 @@ static void armada380_init(struct platform_device *pdev,static void armada_ap806_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data;u32 reg; - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control0); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, ®); reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_RESET ; reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_START |CONTROL0_TSEN_ENABLE ;
@@ -206,7 +208,7 @@ static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev,/* Enable average (2 samples by default) */ reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_AVG_BYPASS ; -writel (reg, priv->control0); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, reg);/* Wait the sensors to be valid or the core will warn the user */ armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv);
@@ -215,25 +217,28 @@ static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev,static void armada_cp110_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data;u32 reg;armada380_init (pdev, priv);/* Sample every ~2ms */ - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control0); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, ®); reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_MAX <<CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_SHIFT ; -writel (reg, priv->control0); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, reg);/* Average the output value over 2^1 = 2 samples */ - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->control1); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); reg &= ~CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_MASK <<CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_SHIFT ; reg |=1 <<CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_SHIFT ; -writel (reg, priv->control1); +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg); }static bool armada_is_valid (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { -u32 reg =readl_relaxed (priv->status); +u32 reg; + +regmap_read (priv->syscon, priv->data->syscon_status_off, ®);return reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit; }
@@ -252,7 +257,7 @@ static int armada_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,return -EIO ; } - reg =readl_relaxed (priv->status); +regmap_read (priv->syscon, priv->data->syscon_status_off, ®); reg = (reg >> priv->data->temp_shift) & priv->data->temp_mask;if (priv->data->signed_sample)/* The most significant bit is the sign bit */
@@ -284,6 +289,8 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armadaxp_data = { .coef_b = 3153000000ULL, .coef_m = 10000000ULL, .coef_div = 13825, + .syscon_status_off = 0xb0, + .syscon_control1_off = 0xd0, };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada370_data = {
@@ -295,6 +302,8 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada370_data = { .coef_b = 3153000000ULL, .coef_m = 10000000ULL, .coef_div = 13825, + .syscon_status_off = 0x0, + .syscon_control1_off = 0x4, };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada375_data = {
@@ -306,7 +315,9 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada375_data = { .coef_b = 3171900000ULL, .coef_m = 10000000ULL, .coef_div = 13616, - .needs_control0 = true, + .syscon_status_off = 0x78, + .syscon_control0_off = 0x7c, + .syscon_control1_off = 0x80, };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada380_data = {
@@ -319,6 +330,9 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada380_data = { .coef_m = 2000096ULL, .coef_div = 4201, .inverted = true, + .syscon_control0_off = 0x70, + .syscon_control1_off = 0x74, + .syscon_status_off = 0x78, };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = {
@@ -332,7 +346,9 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { .coef_div = 1, .inverted = true, .signed_sample = true, - .needs_control0 = true, + .syscon_control0_off = 0x84, + .syscon_control1_off = 0x88, + .syscon_status_off = 0x8C, };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = {
@@ -345,7 +361,9 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = { .coef_m = 2000096ULL, .coef_div = 4201, .inverted = true, - .needs_control0 = true, + .syscon_control0_off = 0x70, + .syscon_control1_off = 0x74, + .syscon_status_off = 0x78, };static const struct of_device_id armada_thermal_id_table[] = {
@@ -379,6 +397,57 @@ static const struct of_device_id armada_thermal_id_table[] = { };MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, armada_thermal_id_table); +static const struct regmap_config armada_thermal_regmap_config = { + .reg_bits =32 , + .reg_stride =4 , + .val_bits =32 , + .fast_io = true, +}; + +static int armada_thermal_probe_legacy (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +struct resource *res; +void __iomem *base; + +/* First memory region points towards the status register */ + res =platform_get_resource (pdev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,0 ); +if (IS_ERR (res)) +return PTR_ERR (res); + +/* +* Edit the resource start address and length to map over all the +* registers, instead of pointing at them one by one. +*/ + res->start -= data->syscon_status_off; + res->end = res->start +max (data->syscon_status_off, +max (data->syscon_control0_off, + data->syscon_control1_off)) + +sizeof (unsigned int ) -1 ; + + base =devm_ioremap_resource (&pdev->dev, res); +if (IS_ERR (base)) +return PTR_ERR (base); + + priv->syscon =devm_regmap_init_mmio (&pdev->dev, base, + &armada_thermal_regmap_config); +if (IS_ERR (priv->syscon)) +return PTR_ERR (priv->syscon); + +return 0 ; +} + +static int armada_thermal_probe_syscon (struct platform_device *pdev, +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ + priv->syscon =syscon_node_to_regmap (pdev->dev.parent->of_node); +if (IS_ERR (priv->syscon)) +return PTR_ERR (priv->syscon); + +return 0 ; +} +static void armada_set_sane_name (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {
@@ -411,11 +480,10 @@ static void armada_set_sane_name(struct platform_device *pdev,static int armada_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -void __iomem *control =NULL ;struct thermal_zone_device *thermal;const struct of_device_id *match;struct armada_thermal_priv *priv; -struct resource *res; +int ret; match =of_match_device (armada_thermal_id_table, &pdev->dev);if (!match)
@@ -425,16 +493,6 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (!priv)return -ENOMEM ; - res =platform_get_resource (pdev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,0 ); - priv->status =devm_ioremap_resource (&pdev->dev, res); -if (IS_ERR (priv->status)) -return PTR_ERR (priv->status); - - res =platform_get_resource (pdev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); - control =devm_ioremap_resource (&pdev->dev, res); -if (IS_ERR (control)) -return PTR_ERR (control); - priv->data = (struct armada_thermal_data *)match->data;/* Ensure device name is correct for the thermal core */
@@ -442,22 +500,23 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)/* * Legacy DT bindings only described "control1" register (also referred -* as "control MSB" on old documentation). New bindings cover +* as "control MSB" on old documentation). Then, bindings moved to cover * "control0/control LSB" and "control1/control MSB" registers within -* the same resource, which is then of size 8 instead of 4. +* the same resource, which was then of size 8 instead of 4. +* +* The logic of defining sporadic registers is broken. For instance, it +* blocked the addition of the overheat interrupt feature that needed +* another resource somewhere else in the same memory area. One solution +* is to define an overall system controller and put the thermal node +* into it, which requires the use of regmaps across all the driver. */ -if (resource_size (res) ==LEGACY_CONTROL_MEM_LEN ) { -/* ->control0 unavailable in this configuration */ -if (priv->data->needs_control0) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"No access to control0 register\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } +if (IS_ERR (syscon_node_to_regmap (pdev->dev.parent->of_node))) + ret =armada_thermal_probe_legacy (pdev, priv); +else + ret =armada_thermal_probe_syscon (pdev, priv); - priv->control1 = control +LEGACY_CONTROL1_OFFSET ; - }else { - priv->control0 = control +CONTROL0_OFFSET ; - priv->control1 = control +CONTROL1_OFFSET ; - } +if (ret) +return ret; priv->data->init (pdev, priv);
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 8/27 thermal: armada: use the resource managed registration helper alternative
In reply to Miquel RaynalCurrent use of thermal_zone_device_register() triggers a warning at boot and should be replaced by devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(). This allows better handling of multiple thermal zones for later multi-sensors support.
Also change the driver data to embed a new structure to make the difference between legacy data (which needs to be cleaned) and syscon-related data.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +107 -21
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct armada_thermal_data;/* Marvell EBU Thermal Sensor Dev Structure */ struct armada_thermal_priv { +struct device *dev;struct regmap *syscon;char zone_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ];struct armada_thermal_data *data;
@@ -95,6 +96,26 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {unsigned int syscon_status_off; }; +struct armada_drvdata { +enum drvtype { +LEGACY , +SYSCON + } type; +union { +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv; +struct thermal_zone_device *tz; + } data; +}; + +/* +* struct armada_thermal_sensor - hold the information of one thermal sensor +* @thermal: pointer to the local private structure +* @tzd: pointer to the thermal zone device +*/ +struct armada_thermal_sensor { +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv; +}; +static void armadaxp_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {
@@ -243,16 +264,14 @@ static bool armada_is_valid(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv)return reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit; } -static int armada_get_temp (struct thermal_zone_device *thermal, -int *temp) +static int armada_read_sensor (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv,long *temp) { -struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = thermal->devdata;u32 reg, div;s64 sample, b, m;/* Valid check */ if (priv->data->is_valid && !priv->data->is_valid (priv)) { -dev_err (&thermal->device, +dev_err (priv->dev,"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n" );return -EIO ; }
@@ -278,7 +297,39 @@ static int armada_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,return 0 ; } -static struct thermal_zone_device_ops ops = { +static int armada_get_temp_legacy (struct thermal_zone_device *thermal, +int *temp) +{ +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = thermal->devdata; +long temperature; +int ret; + +/* Do the actual reading */ + ret =armada_read_sensor (priv, &temperature); + *temp = temperature; + +return ret; +} + +static struct thermal_zone_device_ops legacy_ops = { + .get_temp = armada_get_temp_legacy, +}; + +static int armada_get_temp (void *_sensor,int *temp) +{ +struct armada_thermal_sensor *sensor = _sensor; +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = sensor->priv; +long temperature; +int ret; + +/* Do the actual reading */ + ret =armada_read_sensor (priv, &temperature); + *temp = temperature; + +return ret; +} + +static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops of_ops = { .get_temp = armada_get_temp, };
@@ -480,7 +531,9 @@ static void armada_set_sane_name(struct platform_device *pdev,static int armada_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -struct thermal_zone_device *thermal; +struct thermal_zone_device *tz; +struct armada_thermal_sensor *sensors; +struct armada_drvdata *drvdata;const struct of_device_id *match;struct armada_thermal_priv *priv;int ret;
@@ -493,11 +546,13 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (!priv)return -ENOMEM ; + drvdata =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*drvdata),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!priv) +return -ENOMEM ; + + priv->dev = &pdev->dev; priv->data = (struct armada_thermal_data *)match->data; -/* Ensure device name is correct for the thermal core */ -armada_set_sane_name (pdev, priv); -/* * Legacy DT bindings only described "control1" register (also referred * as "control MSB" on old documentation). Then, bindings moved to cover
@@ -510,35 +565,66 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)* is to define an overall system controller and put the thermal node * into it, which requires the use of regmaps across all the driver. */ -if (IS_ERR (syscon_node_to_regmap (pdev->dev.parent->of_node))) +if (IS_ERR (syscon_node_to_regmap (pdev->dev.parent->of_node))) { +/* Ensure device name is correct for the thermal core */ +armada_set_sane_name (pdev, priv); + ret =armada_thermal_probe_legacy (pdev, priv); -else - ret =armada_thermal_probe_syscon (pdev, priv); +if (ret) +return ret; + priv->data->init (pdev, priv); + + tz =thermal_zone_device_register (priv->zone_name,0 ,0 , priv, + &legacy_ops,NULL ,0 ,0 ); +if (IS_ERR (tz)) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev, +"Failed to register thermal zone device\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (tz); + } + + drvdata->type =LEGACY ; + drvdata->data.tz = tz; +platform_set_drvdata (pdev, drvdata); + +return 0 ; + } + + ret =armada_thermal_probe_syscon (pdev, priv);if (ret)return ret; priv->data->init (pdev, priv); - thermal =thermal_zone_device_register (priv->zone_name,0 ,0 , priv, - &ops,NULL ,0 ,0 ); -if (IS_ERR (thermal)) { + sensors =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (struct armada_thermal_sensor ), +GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!sensors) +return -ENOMEM ; + + sensors->priv = priv; + + tz =devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register (&pdev->dev,0 , sensors, + &of_ops); +if (IS_ERR (tz)) {dev_err (&pdev->dev, -"Failed to register thermal zone device\n" ); -return PTR_ERR (thermal); +"Failed to register thermal sensor (err: %ld)\n" , +PTR_ERR (tz)); +return PTR_ERR (tz); } -platform_set_drvdata (pdev, thermal); + drvdata->type =SYSCON ; + drvdata->data.priv = priv; +platform_set_drvdata (pdev, drvdata);return 0 ; }static int armada_thermal_exit (struct platform_device *pdev) { -struct thermal_zone_device *armada_thermal = -platform_get_drvdata (pdev); +struct armada_drvdata *drvdata =platform_get_drvdata (pdev); -thermal_zone_device_unregister (armada_thermal); +if (drvdata->type ==LEGACY ) +thermal_zone_device_unregister (drvdata->data.tz);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 9/27 thermal: armada: add multi-channel sensors support
In reply to Miquel RaynalMVEBU thermal IP supports multiple channels. Each channel may have several sensors but for now each channel is wired to only one thermal sensor. The first channel always points to the so called internal sensor, within the thermal IP. There is usually one more channel (with one sensor each time) per CPU. The code has been written to support possible evolutions of the ap806 IP that would embed more CPUs and thus more channels to select. Each channel should be referenced in the device tree as an independent thermal zone.
Add the possibility to read each of these sensors through sysfs by registering all the sensors (translated in "thermal_zone"). Also add a mutex on these accesses to avoid read conflicts (only one channel/sensor may be selected and read at a time).
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +111 -19
@@ -49,8 +49,13 @@#define CONTROL0_TSEN_RESET BIT(1)#define CONTROL0_TSEN_ENABLE BIT(2)#define CONTROL0_TSEN_AVG_BYPASS BIT(6) +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_CHAN_SHIFT 13 +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_CHAN_MASK 0xF#define CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_SHIFT 24#define CONTROL0_TSEN_OSR_MAX 0x3 +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_SHIFT 30 +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_EXTERNAL 0x2 +#define CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_MASK 0x3#define CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_SHIFT 0#define CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_MASK 0x7
@@ -67,7 +72,9 @@ struct armada_thermal_priv {struct device *dev;struct regmap *syscon;char zone_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ]; +struct mutex update_lock;struct armada_thermal_data *data; +int current_channel; };struct armada_thermal_data {
@@ -94,6 +101,9 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {unsigned int syscon_control0_off;unsigned int syscon_control1_off;unsigned int syscon_status_off; + +/* One sensor is in the thermal IC, the others are in the CPUs if any */ +unsigned int cpu_nr; };struct armada_drvdata {
@@ -111,9 +121,11 @@ struct armada_drvdata {* struct armada_thermal_sensor - hold the information of one thermal sensor * @thermal: pointer to the local private structure * @tzd: pointer to the thermal zone device +* @id: identifier of the thermal sensor */ struct armada_thermal_sensor {struct armada_thermal_priv *priv; +int id; }; static void armadaxp_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -181,14 +193,15 @@ static void armada375_init(struct platform_device *pdev,msleep (50 ); } -static void armada_wait_sensor_validity (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +static int armada_wait_sensor_validity (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg; -regmap_read_poll_timeout (priv->syscon, priv->data->syscon_status_off, - reg, reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit, -STATUS_POLL_PERIOD_US , -STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT_US ); +return regmap_read_poll_timeout (priv->syscon, + priv->data->syscon_status_off, reg, + reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit, +STATUS_POLL_PERIOD_US , +STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT_US ); } static void armada380_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -264,6 +277,58 @@ static bool armada_is_valid(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv)return reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit; } +/* There is currently no board with more than one sensor per channel */ +static int armada_select_channel (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv,int channel) +{ +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +u32 ctrl0; + +if (channel <0 || channel > priv->data->cpu_nr) +return -EINVAL ; + +if (priv->current_channel == channel) +return 0 ; + +/* Stop the measurements */ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, &ctrl0); + ctrl0 &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_START ; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, ctrl0); + +/* Reset the mode, internal sensor will be automatically selected */ + ctrl0 &= ~(CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_MASK <<CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_SHIFT ); + +/* Other channels are external and should be selected accordingly */ +if (channel) { +/* Change the mode to external */ + ctrl0 |=CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_EXTERNAL << +CONTROL0_TSEN_MODE_SHIFT ; +/* Select the sensor */ + ctrl0 &= ~(CONTROL0_TSEN_CHAN_MASK <<CONTROL0_TSEN_CHAN_SHIFT ); + ctrl0 |= (channel -1 ) <<CONTROL0_TSEN_CHAN_SHIFT ; + } + +/* Actually set the mode/channel */ +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, ctrl0); + priv->current_channel = channel; + +/* Re-start the measurements */ + ctrl0 |=CONTROL0_TSEN_START ; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, ctrl0); + +/* +* The IP has a latency of ~15ms, so after updating the selected source, +* we must absolutely wait for the sensor validity bit to ensure we read +* actual data. +*/ +if (armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv)) { +dev_err (priv->dev, +"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n" ); +return -EIO ; + } + +return 0 ; +} +static int armada_read_sensor (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv,long *temp) {u32 reg, div;
@@ -322,10 +387,23 @@ static int armada_get_temp(void *_sensor, int *temp)long temperature;int ret; +mutex_lock (&priv->update_lock); + +/* Select the desired channel */ + ret =armada_select_channel (priv, sensor->id); +if (ret) + goto unlock_mutex; +/* Do the actual reading */ ret =armada_read_sensor (priv, &temperature); +if (ret) + goto unlock_mutex; + *temp = temperature; +unlock_mutex: +mutex_unlock (&priv->update_lock); +return ret; }
@@ -400,6 +478,7 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { .syscon_control0_off = 0x84, .syscon_control1_off = 0x88, .syscon_status_off = 0x8C, + .cpu_nr = 4, };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = {
@@ -532,10 +611,11 @@ static void armada_set_sane_name(struct platform_device *pdev,static int armada_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) {struct thermal_zone_device *tz; -struct armada_thermal_sensor *sensors; +struct armada_thermal_sensor *sensor;struct armada_drvdata *drvdata;const struct of_device_id *match;struct armada_thermal_priv *priv; +int sensor_id;int ret; match =of_match_device (armada_thermal_id_table, &pdev->dev);
@@ -553,6 +633,8 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->dev = &pdev->dev; priv->data = (struct armada_thermal_data *)match->data; +mutex_init (&priv->update_lock); +/* * Legacy DT bindings only described "control1" register (also referred * as "control MSB" on old documentation). Then, bindings moved to cover
@@ -594,22 +676,32 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (ret)return ret; + priv->current_channel =-1 ; priv->data->init (pdev, priv); - sensors =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (struct armada_thermal_sensor ), -GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!sensors) -return -ENOMEM ; +/* +* There is one channel for the IC and one per CPU (if any), each +* channel has one sensor. +*/ +for (sensor_id =0 ; sensor_id <= priv->data->cpu_nr; sensor_id++) { + sensor =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev, +sizeof (struct armada_thermal_sensor ), +GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!sensor) +return -ENOMEM ; - sensors->priv = priv; - - tz =devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register (&pdev->dev,0 , sensors, - &of_ops); -if (IS_ERR (tz)) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev, -"Failed to register thermal sensor (err: %ld)\n" , -PTR_ERR (tz)); -return PTR_ERR (tz); +/* Register the sensor */ + sensor->priv = priv; + sensor->id = sensor_id; + tz =devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register (&pdev->dev, + sensor->id, sensor, + &of_ops); +if (IS_ERR (tz)) { +dev_info (&pdev->dev,"Thermal sensor %d unavailable\n" , + sensor_id); +devm_kfree (&pdev->dev, sensor); +continue ; + } } drvdata->type =SYSCON ;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 10/27 thermal: armada: remove sensors validity from the IP initialization
In reply to Miquel RaynalWhen using new bindings with multiple sensors, sensor validity is checked twice because sensor selection also checks for the validity.
Remove the redundant call from the IP initialization helper and move it to the legacy probe section where it is still needed.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +3 -6
@@ -221,9 +221,6 @@ static void armada380_init(struct platform_device *pdev, reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_MASK ; reg |=CONTROL0_TSEN_TC_TRIM_VAL ;regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, reg); - -/* Wait the sensors to be valid or the core will warn the user */ -armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv); } static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -243,9 +240,6 @@ static void armada_ap806_init(struct platform_device *pdev, reg &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_AVG_BYPASS ;regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, reg); - -/* Wait the sensors to be valid or the core will warn the user */ -armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv); } static void armada_cp110_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -657,6 +651,9 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->data->init (pdev, priv); +/* Wait the sensors to be valid */ +armada_wait_sensor_validity (priv); + tz =thermal_zone_device_register (priv->zone_name,0 ,0 , priv, &legacy_ops,NULL ,0 ,0 );if (IS_ERR (tz)) {
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 11/27 thermal: armada: move validity check out of the read function
In reply to Miquel RaynalSensor selection when using multiple sensors already checks for the sensor validity. Move it to the legacy ->get_temp() hook, where it is still needed.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +7 -7
@@ -328,13 +328,6 @@ static int armada_read_sensor(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv, long *temp)u32 reg, div;s64 sample, b, m; -/* Valid check */ -if (priv->data->is_valid && !priv->data->is_valid (priv)) { -dev_err (priv->dev, -"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n" ); -return -EIO ; - } -regmap_read (priv->syscon, priv->data->syscon_status_off, ®); reg = (reg >> priv->data->temp_shift) & priv->data->temp_mask;if (priv->data->signed_sample)
@@ -363,6 +356,13 @@ static int armada_get_temp_legacy(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,long temperature;int ret; +/* Valid check */ +if (priv->data->is_valid && !priv->data->is_valid (priv)) { +dev_err (priv->dev, +"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n" ); +return -EIO ; + } +/* Do the actual reading */ ret =armada_read_sensor (priv, &temperature); *temp = temperature;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 12/27 thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer
In reply to Miquel RaynalThe implementation of armada_is_valid() is very simple and is the same across all the versions of the IP since the ->is_valid_bit has been introduced. Simplify the structure by getting rid of the function pointer and calling directly the function.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +4 -9
@@ -82,9 +82,6 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {void (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv); -/* Test for a valid sensor value (optional) */ -bool (*is_valid)(struct armada_thermal_priv *); -/* Formula coeficients: temp = (b - m * reg) / div */ s64 coef_b;s64 coef_m;
@@ -266,6 +263,9 @@ static bool armada_is_valid(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {u32 reg; +if (!priv->data->is_valid_bit) +return true; +regmap_read (priv->syscon, priv->data->syscon_status_off, ®);return reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit;
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int armada_get_temp_legacy(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,int ret;/* Valid check */ -if (priv->data->is_valid && !priv->data->is_valid (priv)) { +if (armada_is_valid (priv)) {dev_err (priv->dev,"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n" );return -EIO ;
@@ -417,7 +417,6 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armadaxp_data = { };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada370_data = { - .is_valid = armada_is_valid, .init = armada370_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (9 ), .temp_shift =10 ,
@@ -430,7 +429,6 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada370_data = { };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada375_data = { - .is_valid = armada_is_valid, .init = armada375_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 ,
@@ -444,7 +442,6 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada375_data = { };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada380_data = { - .is_valid = armada_is_valid, .init = armada380_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 ,
@@ -459,7 +456,6 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada380_data = { };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { - .is_valid = armada_is_valid, .init = armada_ap806_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (16 ), .temp_shift =0 ,
@@ -476,7 +472,6 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { };static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = { - .is_valid = armada_is_valid, .init = armada_cp110_init, .is_valid_bit =BIT (10 ), .temp_shift =0 ,
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 13/27 thermal: armada: add overheat interrupt support
In reply to Miquel RaynalThe IP can manage to trigger interrupts on overheat situation from all the sensors.
However, the interrupt source changes along with the last selected source (ie. the last read sensor), which is an inconsistent behavior. Avoid possible glitches by always selecting back only one channel which will then be referenced as the "overheat_sensor" (arbitrarily: the first in the DT which has a critical trip point filled in).
It is possible that the scan of all thermal zone nodes did not bring a critical trip point from which the overheat interrupt could be configured. In this case just complain but do not fail the probe.
Also disable sensor switch during overheat situations because changing the channel while the system is too hot could clear the overheat state by changing the source while the temperature is still very high.
Even if the overheat state is not declared, overheat interrupt must be cleared by reading the DFX interrupt cause _after_ the temperature has fallen down to the low threshold, otherwise future possible interrupts would not be served. A work polls the corresponding register until the overheat flag gets cleared in this case.
--- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 335 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 335 insertions(+)
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +335 -0
@@ -24,8 +24,14 @@#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/thermal.h> #include <linux/iopoll.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> #include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/workqueue.h> + +#include "thermal_core.h" + +#define TO_MCELSIUS (c) (c * 1000)/* Thermal Manager Control and Status Register */ #define PMU_TDC0_SW_RST_MASK (0x1 << 1)
@@ -61,9 +67,13 @@#define CONTROL1_TSEN_AVG_MASK 0x7#define CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_SW_RESET BIT(7)#define CONTROL1_EXT_TSEN_HW_RESETn BIT(8) +#define CONTROL1_TSEN_INT_EN BIT(25) +#define CONTROL1_TSEN_SELECT_OFF 21 +#define CONTROL1_TSEN_SELECT_MASK 0x3#define STATUS_POLL_PERIOD_US 1000#define STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 100000 +#define OVERHEAT_INT_POLL_DELAY (1 * HZ)struct armada_thermal_data ;
@@ -73,8 +83,15 @@ struct armada_thermal_priv {struct regmap *syscon;char zone_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH ];struct mutex update_lock; +struct thermal_zone_device *overheat_sensor;struct armada_thermal_data *data;int current_channel; +struct delayed_work wait_end_overheat_work; +bool overheat_int_enabled; +long current_threshold; +long current_hysteresis; +bool overheat_situation; +int interrupt_source; };struct armada_thermal_data {
@@ -92,12 +109,20 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {/* Register shift and mask to access the sensor temperature */ unsigned int temp_shift;unsigned int temp_mask; +unsigned int thresh_shift; +unsigned int hyst_shift; +unsigned int hyst_mask;u32 is_valid_bit;/* Syscon access */ unsigned int syscon_control0_off;unsigned int syscon_control1_off;unsigned int syscon_status_off; +unsigned int dfx_irq_cause_off; +unsigned int dfx_irq_mask_off; +unsigned int dfx_overheat_irq; +unsigned int dfx_server_irq_mask_off; +unsigned int dfx_server_irq_en;/* One sensor is in the thermal IC, the others are in the CPUs if any */ unsigned int cpu_nr;
@@ -125,6 +150,12 @@ struct armada_thermal_sensor {int id; }; +struct armada_thermal_priv *work_to_thermal (struct work_struct *work) +{ + return container_of(work, struct armada_thermal_priv, + wait_end_overheat_work.work); +} +static void armadaxp_init (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) {
@@ -271,6 +302,44 @@ static bool armada_is_valid(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv)return reg & priv->data->is_valid_bit; } +static void armada_enable_overheat_interrupt (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +u32 reg; + +/* Clear DFX temperature IRQ cause */ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_cause_off, ®); + +/* Enable DFX Temperature IRQ */ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_mask_off, ®); + reg |= data->dfx_overheat_irq; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_mask_off, reg); + +/* Enable DFX server IRQ */ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->dfx_server_irq_mask_off, ®); + reg |= data->dfx_server_irq_en; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->dfx_server_irq_mask_off, reg); + +/* Enable overheat interrupt */ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); + reg |=CONTROL1_TSEN_INT_EN ; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg); + + priv->overheat_int_enabled = true; +} + +static void armada_disable_overheat_interrupt (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +u32 reg; + +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ®); + reg &= ~CONTROL1_TSEN_INT_EN ; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, reg); + + priv->overheat_int_enabled = false; +} +/* There is currently no board with more than one sensor per channel */ static int armada_select_channel (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv,int channel) {
@@ -283,6 +352,14 @@ static int armada_select_channel(struct armada_thermal_priv *priv, int channel)if (priv->current_channel == channel)return 0 ; +/* +* Changing the channel while the system is too hot could clear the +* overheat state by changing the source while the temperature is still +* very high. Forbid any channel change in this situation. +*/ +if (priv->overheat_situation) +return -EBUSY ; +/* Stop the measurements */ regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control0_off, &ctrl0); ctrl0 &= ~CONTROL0_TSEN_START ;
@@ -378,11 +455,18 @@ static int armada_get_temp(void *_sensor, int *temp) {struct armada_thermal_sensor *sensor = _sensor;struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = sensor->priv; +bool toggle_int = priv->overheat_int_enabled && + !priv->overheat_situation && + sensor->id != priv->interrupt_source;long temperature;int ret;mutex_lock (&priv->update_lock); +/* Disable the interrupt the time to read another sensor */ +if (toggle_int) +armada_disable_overheat_interrupt (priv); +/* Select the desired channel */ ret =armada_select_channel (priv, sensor->id);if (ret)
@@ -393,6 +477,14 @@ static int armada_get_temp(void *_sensor, int *temp)if (ret) goto unlock_mutex; +/* Select back the interrupt source channel */ + ret =armada_select_channel (priv, priv->interrupt_source); +if (ret) + goto unlock_mutex; + +if (toggle_int) +armada_enable_overheat_interrupt (priv); + *temp = temperature; unlock_mutex:
@@ -405,6 +497,162 @@ static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops of_ops = { .get_temp = armada_get_temp, }; +static unsigned int armada_mc_to_reg_temp (struct armada_thermal_data *data, +unsigned int temp_mc) +{ +s64 b = data->coef_b; +s64 m = data->coef_m; +s64 div = data->coef_div; +unsigned int sample; + +if (data->inverted) + sample =div_s64 (((temp_mc * div) + b), m); +else + sample =div_s64 ((b - (temp_mc * div)), m); + +return sample & data->temp_mask; +} + +static unsigned int armada_mc_to_reg_hyst (struct armada_thermal_data *data, +unsigned int hyst_mc) +{ +/* +* The documentation states: +* high/low watermark = threshold +/- 0.4761 * 2^(hysteresis + 2) +* which is the mathematical derivation for: +* 0x0 <=> 1.9?C, 0x1 <=> 3.8?C, 0x2 <=> 7.6?C, 0x3 <=> 15.2 +*/ +unsigned int hyst_levels_mc[] = {1900 ,3800 ,7600 ,15200 }; +int i; + +/* +* We will always take the smallest possible hysteresis to avoid risking +* the hardware integrity by enlarging the threshold by +8?C in the +* worst case. +*/ +for (i =ARRAY_SIZE (hyst_levels_mc) -1 ; i >0 ; i--) +if (hyst_mc >= hyst_levels_mc[i]) +break ; + +return i & data->hyst_mask; +} + +static void armada_set_overheat_thresholds (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv, +int thresh_mc,int hyst_mc) +{ +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +unsigned int threshold =armada_mc_to_reg_temp (data, thresh_mc); +unsigned int hysteresis =armada_mc_to_reg_hyst (data, hyst_mc); +u32 ctrl1; + +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, &ctrl1); + +/* Set Threshold */ +if (thresh_mc >=0 ) { + ctrl1 &= ~(data->temp_mask << data->thresh_shift); + ctrl1 |= threshold << data->thresh_shift; + priv->current_threshold = thresh_mc; + } + +/* Set Hysteresis */ +if (hyst_mc >=0 ) { + ctrl1 &= ~(data->hyst_mask << data->hyst_shift); + ctrl1 |= hysteresis << data->hyst_shift; + priv->current_hysteresis = hyst_mc; + } + +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->syscon_control1_off, ctrl1); +} + +static bool armada_temp_is_over_threshold (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) +{ +struct armada_thermal_data *data = priv->data; +u32 reg; + +/* +* When an overheat interrupt occurs, poll DFX overheat IRQ cause +* register until the right bit gets cleared. +*/ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_cause_off, ®); +if (reg & data->dfx_overheat_irq) { +/* +* Threshold reached, as different CPs may share the same +* interrupt, we need to mask the overheat interrupt until the +* temperature climbs down to the low-threshold, otherwise if +* another CP reaches its threshold temperature too, it will +* re-trigger an interrupt for the CPs that are already over +* heating. +*/ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_mask_off, ®); + reg &= ~data->dfx_overheat_irq; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_mask_off, reg); + +schedule_delayed_work (&priv->wait_end_overheat_work, +OVERHEAT_INT_POLL_DELAY ); + + priv->overheat_situation = true; + +return true; + } + +/* +* The temperature level is acceptable again, unmask the overheat +* interrupt. +*/ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_mask_off, ®); + reg |= data->dfx_overheat_irq; +regmap_write (priv->syscon, data->dfx_irq_mask_off, reg); + + priv->overheat_situation = false; + +/* Notify the thermal core that the temperature is acceptable again */ +thermal_zone_device_update (priv->overheat_sensor, +THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED ); + +return false; +} + +/* +* Overheat interrupt must be cleared by reading the DFX interrupt cause after +* the temperature has fallen down to the low threshold, otherwise future +* interrupts will not be served. This work polls the corresponding register +* until the overheat flag gets cleared. +*/ +static void armada_wait_end_overheat (struct work_struct *work) +{ +armada_temp_is_over_threshold (work_to_thermal (work)); +} + +static irqreturn_t armada_overheat_isr (int irq,void *blob) +{ +struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = (struct armada_thermal_priv *)blob; +u32 reg; +long temperature; + +/* +* As the interrupt line is shared between CPs, this handler will be +* executed each time a CP triggers an overheat interrupt. Once the +* interrupt is triggered for one CP, it is masked in the DFX register +* until the temperature falls under the threshold, when it is unmasked. +* +* Check if the interrupt is masked, in this case it means the code is +* running on the wrong CP and we should return IRQ_NONE. +*/ +regmap_read (priv->syscon, priv->data->dfx_irq_mask_off, ®); +if (!(reg & priv->data->dfx_overheat_irq)) +return IRQ_NONE ; + +if (armada_temp_is_over_threshold (priv)) { +armada_read_sensor (priv, &temperature); + +/* Notify the core about the unexpected heat level */ +thermal_zone_device_update (priv->overheat_sensor, +THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED ); + } + +return IRQ_HANDLED ; +} +static const struct armada_thermal_data armadaxp_data = { .init = armadaxp_init, .temp_shift =10 ,
@@ -460,6 +708,9 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { .is_valid_bit = BIT(16), .temp_shift = 0, .temp_mask = 0x3ff, + .thresh_shift = 3, + .hyst_shift = 19, + .hyst_mask = 0x3, .coef_b = -150000LL, .coef_m = 423ULL, .coef_div = 1,
@@ -468,6 +719,11 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = { .syscon_control0_off = 0x84, .syscon_control1_off = 0x88, .syscon_status_off = 0x8C, + .dfx_irq_cause_off = 0x108, + .dfx_irq_mask_off = 0x10C, + .dfx_overheat_irq = BIT(22), + .dfx_server_irq_mask_off = 0x104, + .dfx_server_irq_en = BIT(1), .cpu_nr = 4, };
@@ -476,6 +732,9 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = { .is_valid_bit = BIT(10), .temp_shift = 0, .temp_mask = 0x3ff, + .thresh_shift = 16, + .hyst_shift = 26, + .hyst_mask = 0x3, .coef_b = 1172499100ULL, .coef_m = 2000096ULL, .coef_div = 4201,
@@ -483,6 +742,11 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = { .syscon_control0_off = 0x70, .syscon_control1_off = 0x74, .syscon_status_off = 0x78, + .dfx_irq_cause_off = 0x108, + .dfx_irq_mask_off = 0x10C, + .dfx_overheat_irq = BIT(20), + .dfx_server_irq_mask_off = 0x104, + .dfx_server_irq_en = BIT(1), };static const struct of_device_id armada_thermal_id_table[] = {
@@ -560,10 +824,28 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe_legacy(struct platform_device *pdev,static int armada_thermal_probe_syscon (struct platform_device *pdev,struct armada_thermal_priv *priv) { +int irq, ret; + priv->syscon =syscon_node_to_regmap (pdev->dev.parent->of_node);if (IS_ERR (priv->syscon))return PTR_ERR (priv->syscon); + irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (irq <0 ) +return irq; + +/* +* One SEI interrupt in the GIC can be triggered by each DFX server (one +* per CP) upon hardware interrupt from the thermal IP itself. +*/ + ret =devm_request_irq (&pdev->dev, irq, armada_overheat_isr,0 , +NULL , priv); +if (ret) +return ret; + +INIT_DELAYED_WORK (&priv->wait_end_overheat_work, + armada_wait_end_overheat); +return 0 ; }
@@ -597,6 +879,47 @@ static void armada_set_sane_name(struct platform_device *pdev, }while (insane_char); } +/* +* The IP can manage to trigger interrupts on overheat situation from all the +* sensors. However, the interrupt source changes along with the last selected +* source (ie. the last read sensor), which is an inconsistent behavior. Avoid +* possible glitches by always selecting back only one channel (arbitrarily: the +* first in the DT which has a critical trip point). We also disable sensor +* switch during overheat situations. +*/ +static int armada_configure_overheat_int (struct armada_thermal_priv *priv, +struct thermal_zone_device *tz) +{ +/* Retrieve the critical trip point to enable the overheat interrupt */ +const struct thermal_trip *trips =of_thermal_get_trip_points (tz); +struct armada_thermal_sensor *sensor = tz->devdata; +int ret; +int i; + +if (!trips) +return -EINVAL ; + +for (i =0 ; i <of_thermal_get_ntrips (tz); i++) +if (trips[i].type ==THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL ) +break ; + +if (i ==of_thermal_get_ntrips (tz)) +return -EINVAL ; + + ret =armada_select_channel (priv, sensor->id); +if (ret) +return ret; + +armada_set_overheat_thresholds (priv, + trips[i].temperature, + trips[i].hysteresis); +armada_enable_overheat_interrupt (priv); + priv->overheat_sensor = tz; + priv->interrupt_source = sensor->id; + +return 0 ; +} +static int armada_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) {struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
@@ -694,8 +1017,20 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)devm_kfree (&pdev->dev, sensor);continue ; } + +/* +* The first channel that has a critical trip point registered +* in the DT will serve as interrupt source. Others possible +* critical trip points will simply be ignored by the driver. +*/ +if (!priv->overheat_sensor) +armada_configure_overheat_int (priv, tz); } +/* Just complain if no overheat interrupt was set up */ +if (!priv->overheat_sensor) +dev_warn (&pdev->dev,"Overheat interrupt feature disabled\n" ); + drvdata->type =SYSCON ; drvdata->data.priv = priv;platform_set_drvdata (pdev, drvdata);
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 14/27 dt-bindings: cp110: rename cp110 syscon file
In reply to Miquel RaynalThere is no need to give numbers to system controllers inside the documentation as the syscons use the same compatibles. Furthermore, this approach does not scale very well and would force the creation of a new file each time a new syscon is added in the device tree.
---
.../marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} (100%)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt renamed from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller0.txt +0 -0
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Rob Herring
maintainerPATCH 14/27 dt-bindings: cp110: rename cp110 syscon file
Quoted 10 lines · Miquel Raynal
There is no need to give numbers to system controllers inside the documentation as the syscons use the same compatibles. Furthermore, this approach does not scale very well and would force the creation of a new file each time a new syscon is added in the device tree.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} (100%)
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 15/27 dt-bindings: ap806: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons nodes
In reply to Miquel RaynalThere are multiple system controllers in AP806. Because all syscon nodes use the same compatible, it is pertinent to use this same file to list IPs inside it. Thus, change the header to be more generic.
--- .../bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +5 -5
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ Marvell Armada AP806 System Controller ====================================== The AP806 is one of the two core HW blocks of the Marvell Armada 7K/8K -SoCs. It contains a system controller, which provides a number -registers giving access to numerous features: clocks, pin-muxing and -many other SoC configuration items. This DT binding allows to describe -this system controller. +SoCs. It contains system controllers, which provide several registers +giving access to numerous features: clocks, pin-muxing and many other +SoC configuration items. This DT binding allows to describe these +system controllers. For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - - reg: register area of the AP806 system controller + - reg: register area of the AP806 system controller Clocks: -------
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 16/27 dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons nodes
In reply to Miquel RaynalThere are multiple system controllers in CP110. Because all syscon nodes use the same compatible, it is pertinent to use this same file to list IPs inside it. Thus, change the header to be more generic, and align with AP806 file.
--- .../bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +7 -7
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ -Marvell Armada CP110 System Controller 0 -======================================== +Marvell Armada CP110 System Controller +====================================== The CP110 is one of the two core HW blocks of the Marvell Armada 7K/8K -SoCs. It contains two sets of system control registers, System -Controller 0 and System Controller 1. This Device Tree binding allows -to describe the first system controller, which provides registers to -configure various aspects of the SoC. +SoCs. It contains system controllers, which provide several registers +giving access to numerous features: clocks, pin-muxing and many other +SoC configuration items. This DT binding allows to describe these +system controllers. For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller 0 + - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller Clocks: -------
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Rob Herring
maintainerPATCH 16/27 dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons nodes
Quoted 16 lines · Miquel Raynal
There are multiple system controllers in CP110. Because all syscon nodes use the same compatible, it is pertinent to use this same file to list IPs inside it. Thus, change the header to be more generic, and align with AP806 file.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +0
-1@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ -Marvell Armada CP110 System Controller 0
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt line 5
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +3
-5-======================================== +Marvell Armada CP110 System Controller +====================================== The CP110 is one of the two core HW blocks of the Marvell Armada 7K/8K -SoCs. It contains two sets of system control registers, System -Controller 0 and System Controller 1. This Device Tree binding allows -to describe the first system controller, which provides registers to -configure various aspects of the SoC. +SoCs. It contains system controllers, which provide several registers
Is this really multiple discrete blocks?
Quoted 14 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +4
-1+giving access to numerous features: clocks, pin-muxing and many other +SoC configuration items. This DT binding allows to describe these +system controllers. For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller 0 + - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller Clocks: -------Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 16/27 dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons nodes
Hi Rob,
Quoted 21 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 20 lines · Miquel Raynal
There are multiple system controllers in CP110. Because all syscon nodes use the same compatible, it is pertinent to use this same file to list IPs inside it. Thus, change the header to be more generic, and align with AP806 file.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +2
-2@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ -Marvell Armada CP110 System Controller 0 -======================================== +Marvell Armada CP110 System Controller +======================================
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt line 5
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +1
-4The CP110 is one of the two core HW blocks of the Marvell Armada 7K/8K -SoCs. It contains two sets of system control registers, System -Controller 0 and System Controller 1. This Device Tree binding allows -to describe the first system controller, which provides registers to -configure various aspects of the SoC. +SoCs. It contains system controllers, which provide several registersIs this really multiple discrete blocks?
I can't tell for sure, but the specification clearly names the #6f8000-#6f9000 region as "AP General Management Registers" and does not refer in any manner to the other (already described) syscon at #6f4000-#6f6000 which is used for clocks and pinctrl management already.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +4
-1+giving access to numerous features: clocks, pin-muxing and many other +SoC configuration items. This DT binding allows to describe these +system controllers. For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller 0 + - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +0
-0Clocks: -------Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Regards,
Miqu?l
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 17/27 dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
In reply to Miquel RaynalExplain the thermal bindings now that the thermal IP is described being inside of a system controller. Add a reference to the thermal-zone node.
--- .../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +43 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - reg: register area of the AP806 system controller +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 0 +=================== + Clocks: -------
@@ -98,3 +101,43 @@ ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { gpio-ranges = <&ap_pinctrl 0 0 19>; }; }; + +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 1 +=================== + +Thermal: +-------- + +For common binding part and usage, refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt + +The thermal IP can probe the temperature all around the processor. It +may feature several channels, each of them wired to one sensor. + +It is possible to setup an overheat interrupt by giving at least one +critical point to any subnode of the thermal-zone node. + +Required properties: +- compatible: "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal" + +Optional properties: +- interrupt-parent/interrupts: overheat interrupt handle. Should point to + line 18 of the SEI irqchip. + See interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt +- #thermal-sensor-cells: shall be <1> when thermal-zones subnodes refer + to this IP and represents the channel ID. There is one sensor per + channel. O refers to the thermal IP internal channel, while positive + IDs refer to each CPU. + +Example: +ap_syscon1: system-controller at 6f8000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x6f8000 0x1000>; + + ap_thermal: ap-thermal { + compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal"; + interrupt-parent = <&sei>; + interrupts = <18>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + }; +};
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Rob Herring
maintainerPATCH 17/27 dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
Quoted 51 lines · Miquel Raynal
Explain the thermal bindings now that the thermal IP is described being inside of a system controller. Add a reference to the thermal-zone node.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +28
-0@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - reg: register area of the AP806 system controller +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 0 +=================== + Clocks: -------@@ -98,3 +101,43 @@ ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { gpio-ranges = <&ap_pinctrl 0 0 19>; }; }; + +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 1 +=================== + +Thermal: +-------- + +For common binding part and usage, refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt + +The thermal IP can probe the temperature all around the processor. It +may feature several channels, each of them wired to one sensor. + +It is possible to setup an overheat interrupt by giving at least one +critical point to any subnode of the thermal-zone node. + +Required properties: +- compatible: "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal" + +Optional properties: +- interrupt-parent/interrupts: overheat interrupt handle. Should point to + line 18 of the SEI irqchip. + See interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt +- #thermal-sensor-cells: shall be <1> when thermal-zones subnodes refer + to this IP and represents the channel ID. There is one sensor per
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { · line 138
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +10
-0+ channel. O refers to the thermal IP internal channel, while positive + IDs refer to each CPU. + +Example: +ap_syscon1: system-controller at 6f8000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x6f8000 0x1000>; + + ap_thermal: ap-thermal { + compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal";
Is there a register range associated with the thermal functions?
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +5
-0+ interrupt-parent = <&sei>; + interrupts = <18>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + }; +};Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 17/27 dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
Hi Rob,
Quoted 56 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 55 lines · Miquel Raynal
Explain the thermal bindings now that the thermal IP is described being inside of a system controller. Add a reference to the thermal-zone node.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +32
-0@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - reg: register area of the AP806 system controller +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 0 +=================== + Clocks: -------@@ -98,3 +101,43 @@ ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { gpio-ranges = <&ap_pinctrl 0 0 19>; }; }; + +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 1 +=================== + +Thermal: +-------- + +For common binding part and usage, refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt + +The thermal IP can probe the temperature all around the processor. It +may feature several channels, each of them wired to one sensor. + +It is possible to setup an overheat interrupt by giving at least one +critical point to any subnode of the thermal-zone node. + +Required properties: +- compatible: "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal" + +Optional properties: +- interrupt-parent/interrupts: overheat interrupt handle. Should point to + line 18 of the SEI irqchip. + See interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt +- #thermal-sensor-cells: shall be <1> when thermal-zones subnodes refer + to this IP and represents the channel ID. There is one sensor per + channel. O refers to the thermal IP internal channel, while positive + IDs refer to each CPU. + +Example:
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { · line 138
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +6
-0+ap_syscon1: system-controller at 6f8000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x6f8000 0x1000>; + + ap_thermal: ap-thermal { + compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal";Is there a register range associated with the thermal functions?
Yes, I will add it.
Thanks,
Miqu?l
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +5
-0+ interrupt-parent = <&sei>; + interrupts = <18>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + }; +};Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 17/27 dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
In reply to Rob HerringHi Rob,
Thanks for reviewing, one question below.
Quoted 56 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 55 lines · Miquel Raynal
Explain the thermal bindings now that the thermal IP is described being inside of a system controller. Add a reference to the thermal-zone node.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +32
-0@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - reg: register area of the AP806 system controller +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 0 +=================== + Clocks: -------@@ -98,3 +101,43 @@ ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { gpio-ranges = <&ap_pinctrl 0 0 19>; }; }; + +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 1 +=================== + +Thermal: +-------- + +For common binding part and usage, refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt + +The thermal IP can probe the temperature all around the processor. It +may feature several channels, each of them wired to one sensor. + +It is possible to setup an overheat interrupt by giving at least one +critical point to any subnode of the thermal-zone node. + +Required properties: +- compatible: "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal" + +Optional properties: +- interrupt-parent/interrupts: overheat interrupt handle. Should point to + line 18 of the SEI irqchip. + See interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt +- #thermal-sensor-cells: shall be <1> when thermal-zones subnodes refer + to this IP and represents the channel ID. There is one sensor per + channel. O refers to the thermal IP internal channel, while positive + IDs refer to each CPU. + +Example:
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { · line 138
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +6
-0+ap_syscon1: system-controller at 6f8000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x6f8000 0x1000>; + + ap_thermal: ap-thermal { + compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal";Is there a register range associated with the thermal functions?
Indeed there is a small one (three registers) but we also need to access some registers out of this area (so called the 'DFX' area, in this syscon, to route correctly the interrupt) and I fear we'll need to access others in the future. I choose to declare a syscon because this area mixes a lot of misc registers.
So do you think I should declare these 3 registers area in a reg property? Or keep the way I retrieved the offsets in the syscon:
defining offsets in the code?
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +5
-0+ interrupt-parent = <&sei>; + interrupts = <18>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + }; +};Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Thanks,
Miqu?l
Signature · 3 lines
Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 18/27 dt-bindings: cp110: update documentation since DT de-duplication
In reply to Miquel RaynalCP110 master/slave DT files have been merged in a DT de-duplication work merged in v4.16. Update the syscon documentation accordingly to match the current state of the DT nodes.
--- .../bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +5 -5
@@ -163,26 +163,26 @@ Required properties: Example: -cpm_syscon0: system-controller at 440000 { +CP110_LABEL(syscon0): system-controller at 440000 { compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; reg = <0x440000 0x1000>; - cpm_clk: clock { + CP110_LABEL(clk): clock { compatible = "marvell,cp110-clock"; #clock-cells = <2>; }; - cpm_pinctrl: pinctrl { + CP110_LABEL(pinctrl): pinctrl { compatible = "marvell,armada-8k-cpm-pinctrl"; }; - cpm_gpio1: gpio at 100 { + CP110_LABEL(gpio1): gpio at 100 { compatible = "marvell,armada-8k-gpio"; offset = <0x100>; ngpios = <32>; gpio-controller; #gpio-cells = <2>; - gpio-ranges = <&cpm_pinctrl 0 0 32>; + gpio-ranges = <&CP110_LABEL(pinctrl) 0 0 32>; }; };
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Rob Herring
maintainerPATCH 18/27 dt-bindings: cp110: update documentation since DT de-duplication
Quoted 8 lines · Miquel Raynal
CP110 master/slave DT files have been merged in a DT de-duplication work merged in v4.16. Update the syscon documentation accordingly to match the current state of the DT nodes.
Signed-off-by Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>--- .../bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 19/27 dt-bindings: cp110: add the thermal node in the syscon file
In reply to Miquel RaynalExplain the thermal bindings now that the thermal IP is described being inside of a system controller. Add a reference to the thermal-zone node.
--- .../arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt +42 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ For the top level node: - compatible: must be: "syscon", "simple-mfd"; - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 0 +=================== + Clocks: -------
@@ -186,3 +189,42 @@ CP110_LABEL(syscon0): system-controller at 440000 { }; }; + +SYSTEM CONTROLLER 1 +=================== + +Thermal: +-------- + +The thermal IP can probe the temperature all around the processor. It +may feature several channels, each of them wired to one sensor. + +It is possible to setup an overheat interrupt by giving at least one +critical point to any subnode of the thermal-zone node. + +For common binding part and usage, refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt + +Required properties: +- compatible: "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal" + +Optional properties: +- interrupt-parent/interrupts: overheat interrupt handle. Should point to + line 37 of the SEI irqchip (shared between CPs). + See interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt +- #thermal-sensor-cells: shall be <1> when thermal-zones subnodes refer + to this IP and represents the channel ID. There is one sensor per + channel. O refers to the thermal IP internal channel. + +Example: +CP110_LABEL(syscon1): system-controller at 6f8000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x6f8000 0x1000>; + + CP110_LABEL(thermal): ap-thermal { + compatible = "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal"; + interrupt-parent = <&sei>; + interrupts = <37>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + }; +};
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 20/27 dt-bindings: thermal: armada: add reference to new bindings
In reply to Miquel RaynalNew bindings (with the syscon and the overheat interrupt) are available for AP806 and CP110 compatibles. Add a reference to these files from the original documentation.
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt +5 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ Required properties: * marvell,armada-ap806-thermal * marvell,armada-cp110-thermal +Note: these bindings are deprecated for AP806/CP110 and should instead +follow the rules described in: +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/cp110-system-controller.txt + - reg: Device's register space. Two entries are expected, see the examples below. The first one points to the status register (4B). The second one points to the control
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 21/27 arm64: dts: marvell: rename ap806 syscon node
In reply to Miquel RaynalIn CP files, the syscons are called CP110_LABEL(syscon<x>) in case of future additions. Use the same logic here to prepare the addition of a second syscon to access both the thermal IP, the DFX server registers and later probably other registers within this same memory area.
--- .../devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt +1 -1
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Required properties: - offset: offset address inside the syscon block Example: -ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { +ap_syscon0: system-controller at 6f4000 { compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; reg = <0x6f4000 0x1000>;
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi +1 -1
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ status = "disabled"; }; - ap_syscon: system-controller at 6f4000 { + ap_syscon0: system-controller at 6f4000 { compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; reg = <0x6f4000 0x2000>;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 22/27 arm64: dts: marvell: move AP806/CP110 thermal nodes into a new syscon
In reply to Miquel RaynalNew bindings impose to declare the thermal IP from within a new syscon.
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 11 +++++++---- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi +7 -4
@@ -266,10 +266,13 @@ }; }; - ap_thermal: thermal at 6f808c { - compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal"; - reg = <0x6f808c 0x4>, - <0x6f8084 0x8>; + ap_syscon1: system-controller at 6f8000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x6f8000 0x1000>; + + ap_thermal: ap-thermal { + compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal"; + }; }; }; };
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi +9 -6
@@ -170,12 +170,6 @@ interrupts = <77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; }; - CP110_LABEL(thermal): thermal at 400078 { - compatible = "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal"; - reg = <0x400078 0x4>, - <0x400070 0x8>; - }; - CP110_LABEL(syscon0): system-controller at 440000 { compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; reg = <0x440000 0x2000>;
@@ -216,6 +210,15 @@ }; }; + CP110_LABEL(syscon1): system-controller at 400000 { + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x400000 0x1000>; + + CP110_LABEL(thermal): thermal at 400070 { + compatible = "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal"; + }; + }; + CP110_LABEL(usb3_0): usb3 at 500000 { compatible = "marvell,armada-8k-xhci", "generic-xhci";
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 23/27 arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in ap806 DTSI file
In reply to Miquel RaynalAdd a thermal-zone node and fill in all the sensors available in an ap806 (one in the IC plus one per CPU).
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi +60 -0
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ */ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h> /dts-v1/;
@@ -272,8 +273,67 @@ ap_thermal: ap-thermal { compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal"; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; }; }; }; }; + + /* + * The thermal IP features one internal sensor plus, if applicable, one + * remote channel wired to one sensor per CPU. + * + * The cooling maps are always empty as there are no cooling devices. + */ + thermal-zones { + ap_thermal_ic: ap-thermal-ic { + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + + thermal-sensors = <&ap_thermal 0>; + + trips { }; + cooling-maps { }; + }; + + ap_thermal_cpu1: ap-thermal-cpu1 { + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + + thermal-sensors = <&ap_thermal 1>; + + trips { }; + cooling-maps { }; + }; + + ap_thermal_cpu2: ap-thermal-cpu2 { + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + + thermal-sensors = <&ap_thermal 2>; + + trips { }; + cooling-maps { }; + }; + + ap_thermal_cpu3: ap-thermal-cpu3 { + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + + thermal-sensors = <&ap_thermal 3>; + + trips { }; + cooling-maps { }; + }; + + ap_thermal_cpu4: ap-thermal-cpu4 { + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + + thermal-sensors = <&ap_thermal 4>; + + trips { }; + cooling-maps { }; + }; + }; };
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 24/27 arm64: dts: marvell: add macro to make distinction between node names
In reply to Miquel RaynalBecause the label is different between CPs, the full path of a node is unique. However, when referring to the end of the path only (the node name), this name is not unique anymore.
The *thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() functions of the thermal core present this limitation and prevent having a thermal-zone per CP.
Add a macro to make the distinction between node names to solve this situation.
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi +1 -0
@@ -7,4 +7,5 @@ #define PASTER(x, y) x ## y #define EVALUATOR(x, y) PASTER(x, y) #define CP110_LABEL(name) EVALUATOR(CP110_NAME, EVALUATOR(_, name)) +#define CP110_NODE_NAME(name) EVALUATOR(CP110_NAME, EVALUATOR(-, name)) #define ADDRESSIFY(addr) EVALUATOR(0x, addr)
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 25/27 arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in cp110 DTSI file
In reply to Miquel RaynalAdd a thermal-zone node and fill in all the sensors available in a cp110 (only one in the thermal IP).
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi +19 -0
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ */ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/mvebu-icu.h> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h> #include "armada-common.dtsi"
@@ -19,6 +20,23 @@ * save one indentation level */ CP110_NAME: CP110_NAME { }; + + /* + * CPs only have one sensor in the thermal IC. + * + * The cooling maps are empty as there are no cooling devices. + */ + thermal-zones { + CP110_LABEL(thermal_ic): CP110_NODE_NAME(thermal-ic) { + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; + polling-delay = <1000>; + + thermal-sensors = <&CP110_LABEL(thermal) 0>; + + trips { }; + cooling-maps { }; + }; + }; }; &CP110_NAME {
@@ -216,6 +234,7 @@ CP110_LABEL(thermal): thermal at 400070 { compatible = "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal"; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; }; };
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 26/27 arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to ap806 thermal node
In reply to Miquel RaynalAdd interrupt properties in the thermal node as well as a critical trip point in the thermal-zone.
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi +15 -3
@@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ ap_thermal: ap-thermal { compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal"; + interrupt-parent = <&sei_wired_controller>; + interrupts = <18>; #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; }; };
@@ -283,16 +285,26 @@ * The thermal IP features one internal sensor plus, if applicable, one * remote channel wired to one sensor per CPU. * + * Only one thermal zone per AP/CP may trigger interrupts at a time, the + * first one that will have a critical trip point will be chosen. + * * The cooling maps are always empty as there are no cooling devices. */ thermal-zones { ap_thermal_ic: ap-thermal-ic { - polling-delay-passive = <1000>; - polling-delay = <1000>; + polling-delay-passive = <0>; /* Interrupt driven */ + polling-delay = <0>; /* Interrupt driven */ thermal-sensors = <&ap_thermal 0>; - trips { }; + trips { + ap_crit: ap-crit { + temperature = <100000>; /* mC degrees */ + hysteresis = <2000>; /* mC degrees */ + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + cooling-maps { }; };
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Miquel Raynal
maintainerPATCH 27/27 arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to cp110 thermal node
In reply to Miquel RaynalAdd interrupt properties in the thermal node as well as a critical trip point in the thermal-zone.
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi +13 -4
@@ -28,12 +28,19 @@ */ thermal-zones { CP110_LABEL(thermal_ic): CP110_NODE_NAME(thermal-ic) { - polling-delay-passive = <1000>; - polling-delay = <1000>; + polling-delay-passive = <0>; /* Interrupt driven */ + polling-delay = <0>; /* Interrupt driven */ thermal-sensors = <&CP110_LABEL(thermal) 0>; - trips { }; + trips { + CP110_LABEL(crit): crit { + temperature = <100000>; /* mC degrees */ + hysteresis = <2000>; /* mC degrees */ + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + cooling-maps { }; }; };
@@ -177,7 +184,7 @@ compatible = "marvell,cp110-icu-sei"; #interrupt-cells = <2>; interrupt-controller; - msi-parent = <&sei>; + msi-parent = <&sei_msi_controller>; }; };
@@ -234,6 +241,8 @@ CP110_LABEL(thermal): thermal at 400070 { compatible = "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal"; + interrupts-extended = + <&CP110_LABEL(icu_sei) 116 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; }; };
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Gregory CLEMENT
maintainercover Add multi-channel and overheat IRQ support to Armada thermal driver
In reply to Miquel RaynalHi Miquel,
Quoted 59 lines · Miquel Raynal
The only capability of the Armada thermal driver is currently just to read one sensor (the default one) per AP and one per CP.
Actually, there is one sensor per core in the AP806 plus one sensor in the thermal IP itself. The CP110 just features one thermal sensor in its own thermal IP.
Also, there is no need for the thermal core to poll the temperature of each sensor by software as this IP (at least for AP806 and CP110 compatibles) features an hardware overheat interrupt.
This series first improves the readability of this driver, then adds support for multi-channel thermal IPs, and finally adds support for the hardware overheat interrupt. The bindings and the device-trees are updated accordingly.
Please note that the thermal IP raises SEI interrupts, from which the support as just been contributed and not merged yet. Applying the last DT patches referring to the 'sei' and '
icu_sei' nodes will require this feature [1] to have been accepted first.[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-April/572852.html
Thank you,
Miqu?lMiquel Raynal (27):
thermal: armada: add a function that sanitizes the thermal zone name
thermal: armada: remove useless register accesses
thermal: armada: remove misleading comments
thermal: armada: rename the initialization routine
thermal: armada: dissociate a380 and cp110 ->init() hooks
thermal: armada: average over samples to avoid glitches
thermal: armada: convert driver to syscon register accesses
thermal: armada: use the resource managed registration helper
alternative
thermal: armada: add multi-channel sensors support
thermal: armada: remove sensors validity from the IP initialization
thermal: armada: move validity check out of the read function
thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer
thermal: armada: add overheat interrupt support
dt-bindings: cp110: rename cp110 syscon file
dt-bindings: ap806: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
nodes
dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
nodes
dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
dt-bindings: cp110: update documentation since DT de-duplication
dt-bindings: cp110: add the thermal node in the syscon file
dt-bindings: thermal: armada: add reference to new bindings
arm64: dts: marvell: rename ap806 syscon node
arm64: dts: marvell: move AP806/CP110 thermal nodes into a new syscon
arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in ap806 DTSI file
arm64: dts: marvell: add macro to make distinction between node names
arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in cp110 DTSI file
arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to ap806 thermal node
arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to cp110 thermal node
Quoted 9 lines
.../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 55 +-
...controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} | 66 +-
.../devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt | 5 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 85 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 45 +-
drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 875 ++++++++++++++++++---
7 files changed, 976 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} (83%)What is the status of this series?
I am especially interested in the dt part. Do you expect sending a new series modifying them?
Gregory
Quoted 4 lines
Signature · 2 lines
-- 2.14.1
Signature · 3 lines
Gregory Clement, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com
Miquel Raynal
maintainercover Add multi-channel and overheat IRQ support to Armada thermal driver
Hi Zhang, Eduardo & Gregory,
Quoted 73 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
Hi Miquel,
Quoted 59 lines · Miquel Raynal
The only capability of the Armada thermal driver is currently just to read one sensor (the default one) per AP and one per CP.
Actually, there is one sensor per core in the AP806 plus one sensor in the thermal IP itself. The CP110 just features one thermal sensor in its own thermal IP.
Also, there is no need for the thermal core to poll the temperature of each sensor by software as this IP (at least for AP806 and CP110 compatibles) features an hardware overheat interrupt.
This series first improves the readability of this driver, then adds support for multi-channel thermal IPs, and finally adds support for the hardware overheat interrupt. The bindings and the device-trees are updated accordingly.
Please note that the thermal IP raises SEI interrupts, from which the support as just been contributed and not merged yet. Applying the last DT patches referring to the 'sei' and '
icu_sei' nodes will require this feature [1] to have been accepted first.[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-April/572852.html
Thank you,
Miqu?lMiquel Raynal (27):
thermal: armada: add a function that sanitizes the thermal zone name
thermal: armada: remove useless register accesses
thermal: armada: remove misleading comments
thermal: armada: rename the initialization routine
thermal: armada: dissociate a380 and cp110 ->init() hooks
thermal: armada: average over samples to avoid glitches
thermal: armada: convert driver to syscon register accesses
thermal: armada: use the resource managed registration helper
alternative
thermal: armada: add multi-channel sensors support
thermal: armada: remove sensors validity from the IP initialization
thermal: armada: move validity check out of the read function
thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer
thermal: armada: add overheat interrupt support
dt-bindings: cp110: rename cp110 syscon file
dt-bindings: ap806: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
nodes
dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
nodes
dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file
dt-bindings: cp110: update documentation since DT de-duplication
dt-bindings: cp110: add the thermal node in the syscon file
dt-bindings: thermal: armada: add reference to new bindings
arm64: dts: marvell: rename ap806 syscon node
arm64: dts: marvell: move AP806/CP110 thermal nodes into a new syscon
arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in ap806 DTSI file
arm64: dts: marvell: add macro to make distinction between node names
arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in cp110 DTSI file
arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to ap806 thermal node
arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to cp110 thermal nodeQuoted 9 lines
.../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt | 55 +- ...controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} | 66 +- .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt | 5 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 85 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 45 +- drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 875 ++++++++++++++++++--- 7 files changed, 976 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-) rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} (83%)
Quoted 3 lines
What is the status of this series?
I am especially interested in the dt part. Do you expect sending a new series modifying them?
I have not received any feedback yet on the thermal part, bindings have been partially acked by Rob (one request, I will probably add a reg property in the AP node) so please do not take the DTS changes of this iteration.
Zhang, Eduardo, could you please share the status of this series?
Thanks,
Miqu?l
Zhang Rui
reviewercover Add multi-channel and overheat IRQ support to Armada thermal driver
Quoted 105 lines · Miquel Raynal
Hi Zhang, Eduardo & Gregory,
Quoted 97 lines · Gregory CLEMENT
Hi Miquel,
?
?On sam., avril 21 2018, Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>Quoted 87 lines · wrote:
The only capability of the Armada thermal driver is currently just to
read one sensor (the default one) per AP and one per CP.Actually, there is one sensor per core in the AP806 plus one sensor in
the thermal IP itself. The CP110 just features one thermal sensor in its
own thermal IP.Also, there is no need for the thermal core to poll the temperature of
each sensor by software as this IP (at least for AP806 and CP110 compatibles) features an hardware overheat interrupt.This series first improves the readability of this driver, then adds
support for multi-channel thermal IPs, and finally adds support for the
hardware overheat interrupt. The bindings and the device-trees are
updated accordingly.Please note that the thermal IP raises SEI interrupts, from which the
support as just been contributed and not merged yet. Applying the last
DT patches referring to the 'sei' and 'icu_sei' nodes will require this
feature [1] to have been accepted first.[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-Ap
ril/572852.htmlThank you,
Miqu?lMiquel Raynal (27):
? thermal: armada: add a function that sanitizes the thermal zone name
? thermal: armada: remove useless register accesses
? thermal: armada: remove misleading comments
? thermal: armada: rename the initialization routine
? thermal: armada: dissociate a380 and cp110 ->init() hooks ? thermal: armada: average over samples to avoid glitches ? thermal: armada: convert driver to syscon register accesses ? thermal: armada: use the resource managed registration helper ????alternative
? thermal: armada: add multi-channel sensors support
? thermal: armada: remove sensors validity from the IP initialization
? thermal: armada: move validity check out of the read function ? thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer ? thermal: armada: add overheat interrupt support
? dt-bindings: cp110: rename cp110 syscon file
? dt-bindings: ap806: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
????nodes
? dt-bindings: cp110: prepare the syscon file to list other syscons
????nodes
? dt-bindings: ap806: add the thermal node in the syscon file ? dt-bindings: cp110: update documentation since DT de- duplication
? dt-bindings: cp110: add the thermal node in the syscon file ? dt-bindings: thermal: armada: add reference to new bindings ? arm64: dts: marvell: rename ap806 syscon node
? arm64: dts: marvell: move AP806/CP110 thermal nodes into a new syscon
? arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in ap806 DTSI file ? arm64: dts: marvell: add macro to make distinction between node names
? arm64: dts: marvell: add thermal-zone node in cp110 DTSI file ? arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to ap806 thermal node
? arm64: dts: marvell: add interrupt support to cp110 thermal node?.../arm/marvell/ap806-system-controller.txt????????|??55 +- ?...controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} |??66 +- ?.../devicetree/bindings/thermal/armada-thermal.txt |???5 + ?arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi??????|??85 +- ?arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi?????|???1 + ?arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi??????|??45 +- ?drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c???????????????????| 875Quoted 4 lines
++++++++++++++++++---
?7 files changed, 976 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-) ?renameDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/{cp110-system-controller0.txt => cp110-system-controller.txt} (83%)??Quoted 3 lines
What is the status of this series?
I am especially interested in the dt part. Do you expect sending a new series modifying them?
Quoted 8 lines
I have not received any feedback yet on the thermal part, bindings have
been partially acked by Rob (one request, I will probably add a reg property in the AP node) so please do not take the DTS changes of this iteration.Zhang, Eduardo, could you please share the status of this series?
hmmm, this should go through Eduardo' thermal-soc tree, thus I'd expect Eduardo to review this patch set.
Eduardo, what's your comments for this series?
thanks,
rui
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks,
Miqu?l