ARM: dts: imx6ul: Correct mask for GIC PPI interrupts
Subsystems (2)
Fabio Estevam
reviewerRFC 1/2 ARM: dts: imx6ul: Correct mask for GIC PPI interrupts
The GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE() macro should take as its argument the actual number of CPU cores the interrupt controller is wired to.
i.MX6UL contains a single Cortex-A7, hence the second interrupt specifier cell for Private Peripheral Interrupts should use "GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1)".
Tested on a imx6ul-evk.
---
Hi,
This is based on the following commit:
commit 2acb79e15119512da9b6a49906840e7678cfb618
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Date: Mon May 7 15:19:52 2018 +0200
ARM: dts: r8a7790: Correct mask for GIC PPI interrupts
R-Car H2 (r8a7790) contains four Cortex-A15 and four Cortex-A7 cores, hence the second interrupt specifier cell for Private Peripheral Interrupts should use "GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8)", to make sure interrupts can be delivered to all 8 processor cores.
and the confirmation from Liviu Dudau that GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE() should take the number of cores in the system as the argument:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/315298.html
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi +4 -4
@@ -108,10 +108,10 @@ timer { compatible = "arm,armv7-timer"; - interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, - <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, - <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, - <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; interrupt-parent = <&intc>; status = "disabled"; };
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Fabio Estevam
reviewerRFC 2/2 ARM: dts: imx7: Correct mask for GIC PPI interrupts
The GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE() macro should take as its argument the actual number of CPU cores the interrupt controller is wired to.
i.MX7S contains a single Cortex-A7, hence the second interrupt specifier cell for Private Peripheral Interrupts should use "GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1)".
Likewise, i.MX7D contains two Cortex-A7 cores, so it should use "GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2)" instead.
Tested on a imx7s-warp.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi +9 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ }; }; + timer { + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer"; + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; + }; + cpu0_opp_table: opp-table { compatible = "operating-points-v2"; opp-shared;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi +4 -4
@@ -160,10 +160,10 @@ timer { compatible = "arm,armv7-timer"; interrupt-parent = <&intc>; - interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, - <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, - <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, - <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; }; soc {
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Shawn Guo
AppliedQuoted 9 lines · Fabio Estevam
The
GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE()macro should take as its argument the actual number of CPU cores the interrupt controller is wired to.i.MX6UL contains a single Cortex-A7, hence the second interrupt specifier cell for Private Peripheral Interrupts should use "
GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1)".Tested on a imx6ul-evk.
Signed-off-by Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Applied both, thanks.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel