Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] hwmon: (occ) Fix potential integer overflow" failed to apply to 4.20-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jan 21, 2019

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 4.20-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From b0407d820b65272fcaa77e0dd1347dc7678d23b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:34:31 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: (occ) Fix potential integer overflow

Cast get_unaligned_be32(...) to u64 in order to give the compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use and avoid a potential integer overflow.

Notice that such function call is used in contexts that expect expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned); and the following expressions are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic:

val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *

                        occ->powr_sample_time_us;

val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *

                        occ->powr_sample_time_us;

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442357 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442476 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442508 ("Unintentional integer overflow")

Fixes ff692d80b2e2 ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions")
drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c +12 -12
index 423903f87955..391118c8aae8 100644
@@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_1(struct device *dev,
 		val *= 1000000ULL;
 		break;
 	case 2:
-		val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
-			occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
+			   occ->powr_sample_time_us;
 		break;
 	case 3:
 		val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_2(struct device *dev,
 				       &power->update_tag);
 		break;
 	case 2:
-		val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
-			occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
+			   occ->powr_sample_time_us;
 		break;
 	case 3:
 		val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 				       &power->system.update_tag);
 		break;
 	case 2:
-		val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) *
-			occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) *
+			   occ->powr_sample_time_us;
 		break;
 	case 3:
 		val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->system.value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 				       &power->proc.update_tag);
 		break;
 	case 6:
-		val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) *
-			occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) *
+			   occ->powr_sample_time_us;
 		break;
 	case 7:
 		val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->proc.value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 				       &power->vdd.update_tag);
 		break;
 	case 10:
-		val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) *
-			occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) *
+			   occ->powr_sample_time_us;
 		break;
 	case 11:
 		val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdd.value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -505,8 +505,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
 				       &power->vdn.update_tag);
 		break;
 	case 14:
-		val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *
-			occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+		val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *
+			   occ->powr_sample_time_us;
 		break;
 	case 15:
 		val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdn.value) * 1000000ULL;