FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ARC: mm: do_page_fault fixes #1: relinquish mmap_sem if" failed to apply to 4.20-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.20-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 4d447455e73b47c43dd35fcc38ed823d3182a474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:56:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARC: mm: do_page_fault fixes #1: relinquish mmap_sem if
signal arrives while handle_mm_fault
do_page_fault() forgot to relinquish mmap_sem if a signal came while handling handle_mm_fault() - due to say a ctl+c or oom etc. This would later cause a deadlock by acquiring it twice.
This came to light when running libc testsuite tst-tls3-malloc test but is likely also the cause for prior seen LTP failures. Using lockdep clearly showed what the issue was.
| # while true; do ./tst-tls3-malloc ; done
| Didn't expect signal from child: got `Segmentation fault'
| ^C
| ============================================
| WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
| 4.17.0+ #25 Not tainted
| --------------------------------------------
| tst-tls3-malloc/510 is trying to acquire lock:
| 606c7728 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0x28/0x5c
|
|but task is already holding lock:
|606c7728 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: do_page_fault+0x9c/0x2a0
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
| Possible unsafe locking scenario:
|
| CPU0
| ----
| lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
| lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
| *** DEADLOCK ***
|------------------------------------------------------------
What the change does is not obvious (note to myself)
prior code was
| do_page_fault | | down_read() <-- lock taken | handle_mm_fault <-- signal pending as this runs | if fatal_signal_pending | if VM_FAULT_ERROR | up_read | if user_mode | return <-- lock still held, this was the BUG
New code
| do_page_fault | | down_read() <-- lock taken | handle_mm_fault <-- signal pending as this runs | if fatal_signal_pending | if VM_FAULT_RETRY | return <-- not same case as above, but still OK since | core mm already relinq lock for FAULT_RETRY | ... | | < Now falls through for bug case above > | | up_read() <-- lock relinquished
arch/arc/mm/fault.c +9 -4
@@ -141,12 +141,17 @@ void do_page_fault(unsigned long address, struct pt_regs *regs)*/ fault =handle_mm_fault (vma, address, flags); -/* If Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL, exit page fault "early" */ if (fatal_signal_pending (current)) { -if ((fault &VM_FAULT_ERROR ) && !(fault &VM_FAULT_RETRY )) -up_read (&mm->mmap_sem); -if (user_mode (regs)) + +/* +* if fault retry, mmap_sem already relinquished by core mm +* so OK to return to user mode (with signal handled first) +*/ +if (fault &VM_FAULT_RETRY ) { +if (!user_mode (regs)) + goto no_context;return ; + } }perf_sw_event (PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS ,1 , regs, address);