FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix pkru save/restore when guest CR4.PKE=0, move it" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 37486135d3a7b03acc7755b63627a130437f066a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Babu Moger <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:59:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix pkru save/restore when guest CR4.PKE=0, move it
to x86.c
Though rdpkru and wrpkru are contingent upon CR4.PKE, the PKRU resource isn't. It can be read with XSAVE and written with XRSTOR. So, if we don't set the guest PKRU value here(kvm_load_guest_xsave_state), the guest can read the host value.
In case of kvm_load_host_xsave_state, guest with CR4.PKE clear could potentially use XRSTOR to change the host PKRU value.
While at it, move pkru state save/restore to common code and the host_pkru field to kvm_vcpu_arch. This will let SVM support protection keys.
Message-Id: <158932794619.44260.14508381096663848853.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com>
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +1 -0
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {unsigned long cr4;unsigned long cr4_guest_owned_bits;unsigned long cr8; +u32 host_pkru;u32 pkru;u32 hflags;u64 efer;
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +0 -18
@@ -1372,7 +1372,6 @@ void vmx_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)vmx_vcpu_pi_load (vcpu, cpu); - vmx->host_pkru =read_pkru (); vmx->host_debugctlmsr =get_debugctlmsr (); }
@@ -6564,11 +6563,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)kvm_load_guest_xsave_state (vcpu); -if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && -kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE ) && - vcpu->arch.pkru != vmx->host_pkru) -__write_pkru (vcpu->arch.pkru); -pt_guest_enter (vmx);if (vcpu_to_pmu (vcpu)->version)
@@ -6658,18 +6652,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)pt_guest_exit (vmx); -/* -* eager fpu is enabled if PKEY is supported and CR4 is switched -* back on host, so it is safe to read guest PKRU from current -* XSAVE. -*/ -if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && -kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE )) { - vcpu->arch.pkru =rdpkru (); -if (vcpu->arch.pkru != vmx->host_pkru) -__write_pkru (vmx->host_pkru); - } -kvm_load_host_xsave_state (vcpu); vmx->nested.nested_run_pending =0 ;
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +17 -0
@@ -837,11 +837,25 @@ void kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.ia32_xss != host_xss)wrmsrl (MSR_IA32_XSS , vcpu->arch.ia32_xss); } + +if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && + (kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE ) || + (vcpu->arch.xcr0 &XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU )) && + vcpu->arch.pkru != vcpu->arch.host_pkru) +__write_pkru (vcpu->arch.pkru); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kvm_load_guest_xsave_state);void kvm_load_host_xsave_state (struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { +if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && + (kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE ) || + (vcpu->arch.xcr0 &XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU ))) { + vcpu->arch.pkru =rdpkru (); +if (vcpu->arch.pkru != vcpu->arch.host_pkru) +__write_pkru (vcpu->arch.host_pkru); + } +if (kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_OSXSAVE )) {if (vcpu->arch.xcr0 != host_xcr0)
@@ -3549,6 +3563,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_load (vcpu, cpu); +/* Save host pkru register if supported */ + vcpu->arch.host_pkru =read_pkru (); +/* Apply any externally detected TSC adjustments (due to suspend) */ if (unlikely (vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment)) {adjust_tsc_offset_host (vcpu, vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment);
Jim, Paolo,
Do you guys want me to take care of this? Let me know. Thanks
Babu
Quoted 146 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 8:40 AM
To: Moger, Babu <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix pkru save/restore when guest CR4.PKE=0, move it" failed to apply to 5.4-stable treeThe patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From
37486135d3a7b03acc7755b63627a130437f066aMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Babu Moger <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:59:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix pkru save/restore when guest CR4.PKE=0, move it
tox86.cThough rdpkru and wrpkru are contingent upon CR4.PKE, the PKRU resource isn't. It can be read with XSAVE and written with XRSTOR. So, if we don't set the guest PKRU value
here(kvm_load_guest_xsave_state), the guest can read the host value.In case of
kvm_load_host_xsave_state, guest with CR4.PKE clear could potentially use XRSTOR to change the host PKRU value.While at it, move pkru state save/restore to common code and the
host_pkrufield tokvm_vcpu_arch. This will let SVM support protection keys.Reported-by Jim Mattson <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Babu Moger <[email protected]>Message-Id: <158932794619.44260.14508381096663848853.stgit@naples- babu.amd.com>
Signed-off-by Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +1
-0@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {unsigned long cr4;unsigned long cr4_guest_owned_bits;unsigned long cr8; +u32 host_pkru;u32 pkru;u32 hflags;u64 efer;arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +0
-18@@ -1372,7 +1372,6 @@ void vmx_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)vmx_vcpu_pi_load (vcpu, cpu); - vmx->host_pkru =read_pkru (); vmx->host_debugctlmsr =get_debugctlmsr (); }@@ -6564,11 +6563,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)kvm_load_guest_xsave_state (vcpu); -if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && -kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE ) && - vcpu->arch.pkru != vmx->host_pkru) -__write_pkru (vcpu->arch.pkru); -pt_guest_enter (vmx);if (vcpu_to_pmu (vcpu)->version)@@ -6658,18 +6652,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)pt_guest_exit (vmx); -/* -* eager fpu is enabled if PKEY is supported and CR4 is switched -* back on host, so it is safe to read guest PKRU from current -* XSAVE. -*/ -if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && -kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE )) { - vcpu->arch.pkru =rdpkru (); -if (vcpu->arch.pkru != vmx->host_pkru) -__write_pkru (vmx->host_pkru); - } -kvm_load_host_xsave_state (vcpu); vmx->nested.nested_run_pending =0 ;arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +14
-0@@ -837,11 +837,25 @@ void kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.ia32_xss != host_xss)wrmsrl (MSR_IA32_XSS , vcpu->arch.ia32_xss); } + +if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && + (kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE ) || + (vcpu->arch.xcr0 &XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU )) && + vcpu->arch.pkru != vcpu->arch.host_pkru) +__write_pkru (vcpu->arch.pkru); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (kvm_load_guest_xsave_state);void kvm_load_host_xsave_state (struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { +if (static_cpu_has (X86_FEATURE_PKU ) && + (kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_PKE ) || + (vcpu->arch.xcr0 &XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU ))) { + vcpu->arch.pkru =rdpkru (); +if (vcpu->arch.pkru != vcpu->arch.host_pkru) +__write_pkru (vcpu->arch.host_pkru); + } +if (kvm_read_cr4_bits (vcpu,X86_CR4_OSXSAVE )) {arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +3
-0if (vcpu->arch.xcr0 != host_xcr0)@@ -3549,6 +3563,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu); +/* Save host pkru register if supported */ + vcpu->arch.host_pkru =read_pkru (); +/* Apply any externally detected TSC adjustments (due to suspend) */ if (unlikely (vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment)) {adjust_tsc_offset_host(vcpu, vcpu-
Quoted 1 line
arch.tsc_offset_adjustment);
Paolo Bonzini
maintainerQuoted 4 lines · Babu Moger
Jim, Paolo,
Do you guys want me to take care of this? Let me know. Thanks
Babu
That would be great, thanks.
Paolo