FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a4c8dd9c2d0987cf542a2a0c42684c9c6d78a04e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:35:28 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks
According to the definition of dm_iterate_devices_fn:
* This function must iterate through each section of device used by the
* target until it encounters a non-zero return code, which it then returns.
* Returns zero if no callout returned non-zero.
For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration in advance. No iterate_devices_callout_fn should return non-zero unless device iteration should stop.
Rename dm_table_requires_stable_pages() to dm_table_any_dev_attr() and elevate it for reuse to stop iterating (and return non-zero) on the first device that causes iterate_devices_callout_fn to return non-zero. Use dm_table_any_dev_attr() to properly iterate through devices.
Rename device_is_nonrot() to device_is_rotational() and invert logic accordingly to fix improper disposition.
drivers/md/dm-table.c +51 -46
@@ -1295,6 +1295,46 @@ struct dm_target *dm_table_find_target(struct dm_table *t, sector_t sector)return &t->targets[(KEYS_PER_NODE * n) + k]; } +/* +* type->iterate_devices() should be called when the sanity check needs to +* iterate and check all underlying data devices. iterate_devices() will +* iterate all underlying data devices until it encounters a non-zero return +* code, returned by whether the input iterate_devices_callout_fn, or +* iterate_devices() itself internally. +* +* For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may +* iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero +* return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration +* in advance. +* +* Cases requiring _any_ underlying device supporting some kind of attribute, +* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_any_dev_attr(), or call +* it directly. @func should handle semantics of positive examples, e.g. +* capable of something. +* +* Cases requiring _all_ underlying devices supporting some kind of attribute, +* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_supports_nowait() or +* dm_table_supports_discards(). Or introduce dm_table_all_devs_attr() that +* uses an @anti_func that handle semantics of counter examples, e.g. not +* capable of something. So: return !dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, anti_func); +*/ +static bool dm_table_any_dev_attr (struct dm_table *t, +iterate_devices_callout_fn func) +{ +struct dm_target *ti; +unsigned int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { + ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); + +if (ti->type->iterate_devices && + ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) +return true; + } + +return false; +} +static int count_device (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {
@@ -1595,12 +1635,12 @@ static int dm_table_supports_dax_write_cache(struct dm_table *t)return false; } -static int device_is_nonrot (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, -sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) +static int device_is_rotational (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {struct request_queue *q =bdev_get_queue (dev->bdev); -return q &&blk_queue_nonrot (q); +return q && !blk_queue_nonrot (q); } static int device_is_not_random(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
@@ -1611,23 +1651,6 @@ static int device_is_not_random(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q && !blk_queue_add_random (q); } -static bool dm_table_all_devices_attribute (struct dm_table *t, -iterate_devices_callout_fn func) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || - !ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) -return false; - } - -return true; -} -static int device_not_write_same_capable (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {
@@ -1779,27 +1802,6 @@ static int device_requires_stable_pages(struct dm_target *ti,return q &&blk_queue_stable_writes (q); } -/* -* If any underlying device requires stable pages, a table must require -* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: -* don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. -*/ -static bool dm_table_requires_stable_pages (struct dm_table *t) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (ti->type->iterate_devices && - ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_requires_stable_pages,NULL )) -return true; - } - -return false; -} -void dm_table_set_restrictions (struct dm_table *t,struct request_queue *q,struct queue_limits *limits) {
@@ -1849,10 +1851,10 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,dax_write_cache (t->md->dax_dev, true);/* Ensure that all underlying devices are non-rotational. */ -if (dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_is_nonrot)) -blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q); -else +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_rotational))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q); +else +blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q);if (!dm_table_supports_write_same (t)) q->limits.max_write_same_sectors =0 ;
@@ -1864,8 +1866,11 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,/* * Some devices don't use blk_integrity but still want stable pages * because they do their own checksumming. +* If any underlying device requires stable pages, a table must require +* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: +* don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. */ -if (dm_table_requires_stable_pages (t)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_requires_stable_pages))blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_STABLE_WRITES , q);else blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_STABLE_WRITES , q);
@@ -1876,7 +1881,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,* Clear QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if any underlying device does not * have it set. */ -if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_is_not_random)) +if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_not_random))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM , q);/*
cover dm: device capability check fixes
- patch 1/4/5 is from upstream
- patch 2/3 is to fix the code specific to 4.4 (has been removed in upstream)
Jeffle Xu (5):
dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks dm table: fix no_sg_merge iterate_devices based device capability
checks
dm table: fix partial completion iterate_devices based device
capability checks
dm table: fix DAX iterate_devices based device capability checks dm table: fix zoned iterate_devices based device capability checks
drivers/md/dm-table.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH 1/5 dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks
commit a4c8dd9c2d0987cf542a2a0c42684c9c6d78a04e upstream.
According to the definition of dm_iterate_devices_fn:
* This function must iterate through each section of device used by the
* target until it encounters a non-zero return code, which it then returns.
* Returns zero if no callout returned non-zero.
For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration in advance. No iterate_devices_callout_fn should return non-zero unless device iteration should stop.
Rename dm_table_requires_stable_pages() to dm_table_any_dev_attr() and elevate it for reuse to stop iterating (and return non-zero) on the first device that causes iterate_devices_callout_fn to return non-zero. Use dm_table_any_dev_attr() to properly iterate through devices.
Rename device_is_nonrot() to device_is_rotational() and invert logic accordingly to fix improper disposition.
--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
drivers/md/dm-table.c +51 -46
@@ -1392,6 +1392,46 @@ struct dm_target *dm_table_find_target(struct dm_table *t, sector_t sector)return &t->targets[(KEYS_PER_NODE * n) + k]; } +/* +* type->iterate_devices() should be called when the sanity check needs to +* iterate and check all underlying data devices. iterate_devices() will +* iterate all underlying data devices until it encounters a non-zero return +* code, returned by whether the input iterate_devices_callout_fn, or +* iterate_devices() itself internally. +* +* For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may +* iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero +* return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration +* in advance. +* +* Cases requiring _any_ underlying device supporting some kind of attribute, +* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_any_dev_attr(), or call +* it directly. @func should handle semantics of positive examples, e.g. +* capable of something. +* +* Cases requiring _all_ underlying devices supporting some kind of attribute, +* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_supports_nowait() or +* dm_table_supports_discards(). Or introduce dm_table_all_devs_attr() that +* uses an @anti_func that handle semantics of counter examples, e.g. not +* capable of something. So: return !dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, anti_func); +*/ +static bool dm_table_any_dev_attr (struct dm_table *t, +iterate_devices_callout_fn func) +{ +struct dm_target *ti; +unsigned int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { + ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); + +if (ti->type->iterate_devices && + ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) +return true; + } + +return false; +} +static int count_device (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {
@@ -1708,12 +1748,12 @@ static int dm_table_supports_dax_write_cache(struct dm_table *t)return false; } -static int device_is_nonrot (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, -sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) +static int device_is_rotational (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {struct request_queue *q =bdev_get_queue (dev->bdev); -return q &&blk_queue_nonrot (q); +return q && !blk_queue_nonrot (q); } static int device_is_not_random(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
@@ -1732,23 +1772,6 @@ static int queue_supports_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q && !test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } -static bool dm_table_all_devices_attribute (struct dm_table *t, -iterate_devices_callout_fn func) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || - !ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) -return false; - } - -return true; -} -static int device_no_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {
@@ -1887,27 +1910,6 @@ static int device_requires_stable_pages(struct dm_target *ti,return q &&bdi_cap_stable_pages_required (q->backing_dev_info); } -/* -* If any underlying device requires stable pages, a table must require -* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: -* don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. -*/ -static bool dm_table_requires_stable_pages (struct dm_table *t) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (ti->type->iterate_devices && - ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_requires_stable_pages,NULL )) -return true; - } - -return false; -} -void dm_table_set_restrictions (struct dm_table *t,struct request_queue *q,struct queue_limits *limits) {
@@ -1948,10 +1950,10 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,dax_write_cache (t->md->dax_dev, true);/* Ensure that all underlying devices are non-rotational. */ -if (dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_is_nonrot)) -blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q); -else +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_rotational))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q); +else +blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q);if (!dm_table_supports_write_same (t)) q->limits.max_write_same_sectors =0 ;
@@ -1968,8 +1970,11 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,/* * Some devices don't use blk_integrity but still want stable pages * because they do their own checksumming. +* If any underlying device requires stable pages, a table must require +* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: +* don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. */ -if (dm_table_requires_stable_pages (t)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_requires_stable_pages)) q->backing_dev_info->capabilities |=BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES ;else q->backing_dev_info->capabilities &= ~BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES ;
@@ -1980,7 +1985,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,* Clear QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if any underlying device does not * have it set. */ -if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_is_not_random)) +if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_not_random))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM , q); }
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 4.19.y 1/5] dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks
Quoted 188 lines · Jeffle Xu
commit
a4c8dd9c2d0987cf542a2a0c42684c9c6d78a04eupstream.According to the definition of
dm_iterate_devices_fn:
* This function must iterate through each section of device used by the
* target until it encounters a non-zero return code, which it then returns.
* Returns zero if no callout returned non-zero.For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of
iterate_devices()may iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero return code returned byiterate_devices_callout_fnwill stop the iteration in advance. Noiterate_devices_callout_fnshould return non-zero unless device iteration should stop.Rename
dm_table_requires_stable_pages()todm_table_any_dev_attr()and elevate it for reuse to stop iterating (and return non-zero) on the first device that causesiterate_devices_callout_fnto return non-zero. Usedm_table_any_dev_attr()to properly iterate through devices.Rename
device_is_nonrot()todevice_is_rotational()and invert logic accordingly to fix improper disposition.Fixes c3c4555edd10 ("dm table: clear add_random unless all devices have it set")Fixes 4693c9668fdc ("dm table: propagate non rotational flag")Signed-off-by Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)drivers/md/dm-table.c +51
-46@@ -1392,6 +1392,46 @@ struct dm_target *dm_table_find_target(struct dm_table *t, sector_t sector)return &t->targets[(KEYS_PER_NODE * n) + k]; } +/* +* type->iterate_devices() should be called when the sanity check needs to +* iterate and check all underlying data devices. iterate_devices() will +* iterate all underlying data devices until it encounters a non-zero return +* code, returned by whether the input iterate_devices_callout_fn, or +* iterate_devices() itself internally. +* +* For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may +* iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero +* return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration +* in advance. +* +* Cases requiring _any_ underlying device supporting some kind of attribute, +* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_any_dev_attr(), or call +* it directly. @func should handle semantics of positive examples, e.g. +* capable of something. +* +* Cases requiring _all_ underlying devices supporting some kind of attribute, +* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_supports_nowait() or +* dm_table_supports_discards(). Or introduce dm_table_all_devs_attr() that +* uses an @anti_func that handle semantics of counter examples, e.g. not +* capable of something. So: return !dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, anti_func); +*/ +static bool dm_table_any_dev_attr (struct dm_table *t, +iterate_devices_callout_fn func) +{ +struct dm_target *ti; +unsigned int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { + ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); + +if (ti->type->iterate_devices && + ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) +return true; + } + +return false; +} +static int count_device (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {@@ -1708,12 +1748,12 @@ static int dm_table_supports_dax_write_cache(struct dm_table *t)return false; } -static int device_is_nonrot (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, -sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) +static int device_is_rotational (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {struct request_queue *q =bdev_get_queue (dev->bdev); -return q &&blk_queue_nonrot (q); +return q && !blk_queue_nonrot (q); } static int device_is_not_random(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,@@ -1732,23 +1772,6 @@ static int queue_supports_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q && !test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } -static bool dm_table_all_devices_attribute (struct dm_table *t, -iterate_devices_callout_fn func) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || - !ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) -return false; - } - -return true; -} -static int device_no_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {@@ -1887,27 +1910,6 @@ static int device_requires_stable_pages(struct dm_target *ti,return q &&bdi_cap_stable_pages_required (q->backing_dev_info); } -/* -* If any underlying device requires stable pages, a table must require -* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: -* don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. -*/ -static bool dm_table_requires_stable_pages (struct dm_table *t) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (ti->type->iterate_devices && - ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_requires_stable_pages,NULL )) -return true; - } - -return false; -} -void dm_table_set_restrictions (struct dm_table *t,struct request_queue *q,struct queue_limits *limits) {@@ -1948,10 +1950,10 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,dax_write_cache (t->md->dax_dev, true);/* Ensure that all underlying devices are non-rotational. */ -if (dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_is_nonrot)) -blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q); -else +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_rotational))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q); +else +blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q);if (!dm_table_supports_write_same (t)) q->limits.max_write_same_sectors =0 ;@@ -1968,8 +1970,11 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,/* * Some devices don't use blk_integrity but still want stable pages * because they do their own checksumming. +* If any underlying device requires stable pages, a table must require +* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: +* don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. */ -if (dm_table_requires_stable_pages (t)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_requires_stable_pages)) q->backing_dev_info->capabilities |=BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES ;else q->backing_dev_info->capabilities &= ~BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES ;@@ -1980,7 +1985,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,* Clear QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if any underlying device does not * have it set. */ -if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_is_not_random)) +if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_not_random))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM , q); }Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Breaks the build :(
PATCH 2/5 dm table: fix no_sg_merge iterate_devices based device capability checks
In reply to Jeffle XuSimilar to commit a4c8dd9c2d09 ("dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks"), fix NO_SG_MERGE capability check and invert logic of the corresponding iterate_devices_callout_fn so that all devices' NO_SG_MERGE capabilities are properly checked.
--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/md/dm-table.c +6 -6
@@ -1764,12 +1764,12 @@ static int device_is_not_random(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q && !blk_queue_add_random (q); } -static int queue_supports_sg_merge (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, -sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) +static int queue_no_sg_merge (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {struct request_queue *q =bdev_get_queue (dev->bdev); -return q && !test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); +return q &&test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } static int device_no_partial_completion(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
@@ -1960,10 +1960,10 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,if (!dm_table_supports_write_zeroes (t)) q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors =0 ; -if (dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, queue_supports_sg_merge)) -blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , q); -else +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, queue_no_sg_merge))blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , q); +else +blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , q);dm_table_verify_integrity (t);
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH 3/5 dm table: fix partial completion iterate_devices based device capability checks
In reply to Jeffle XuSimilar to commit a4c8dd9c2d09 ("dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks"), fix partial completion capability check and invert logic of the corresponding iterate_devices_callout_fn so that all devices' partial completion capabilities are properly checked.
--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/md/dm-table.c +3 -3
@@ -1772,18 +1772,18 @@ static int queue_no_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q &&test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } -static int device_no_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +static int device_is_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE ];/* For now, NVMe devices are the only devices of this class */ -return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) ==0 ); +return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) !=0 ); }static bool dm_table_does_not_support_partial_completion (struct dm_table *t) { -return dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_no_partial_completion); +return !dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_partial_completion); } static int device_not_write_same_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Re: [PATCH 4.19.y 3/5] dm table: fix partial completion iterate_devices based device capability checks
Quoted 7 lines · Jeffle Xu
Similar to commit
a4c8dd9c2d09("dm table: fixiterate_devicesbased device capability checks"), fix partial completion capability check and invert logic of the correspondingiterate_devices_callout_fnso that all devices' partial completion capabilities are properly checked.Signed-off-by Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>Fixes 22c11858e800 ("dm: introduce DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED")
Similarly, the code this patch fixes, i.e., commit 22c11858e800 ("dm:
introduce DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED"), was removed since commit 9c37de297f65 ("dm: remove special-casing of bio-based immutable singleton target on NVMe") in v5.10. Thus the code base doesn't exist in the latest master branch.
It needs Mike's review.
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Jeffle
Quoted 31 lines
--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/md/dm-table.c +3
-3@@ -1772,18 +1772,18 @@ static int queue_no_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q &&test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } -static int device_no_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +static int device_is_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE ];/* For now, NVMe devices are the only devices of this class */ -return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) ==0 ); +return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) !=0 ); }static bool dm_table_does_not_support_partial_completion (struct dm_table *t) { -return dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_no_partial_completion); +return !dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_partial_completion); } static int device_not_write_same_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
Re: [PATCH 4.19.y 3/5] dm table: fix partial completion iterate_devices based device capability checks
In reply to Jeffle XuHi, Mike,
Would you please spare some time to review the following patches for stable tree?
- [1] for 4.19.y
- [2] for 5.4.y
While backporting [3] for stable tree, there's some extra code specific to stable tree needs to be fixed, see [4] for the background info.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg448749.html
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg448754.html
[3]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.12-rc2&id=a4c8dd9c2d0987cf542a2a0c42684c9c6d78a04e
[4] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg448760.html
Thanks,
Jeffle
Quoted 38 lines · Jeffle Xu
Similar to commit
a4c8dd9c2d09("dm table: fixiterate_devicesbased device capability checks"), fix partial completion capability check and invert logic of the correspondingiterate_devices_callout_fnso that all devices' partial completion capabilities are properly checked.Signed-off-by Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>Fixes 22c11858e800 ("dm: introduce DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED")--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/md/dm-table.c +3
-3@@ -1772,18 +1772,18 @@ static int queue_no_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q &&test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } -static int device_no_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +static int device_is_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE ];/* For now, NVMe devices are the only devices of this class */ -return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) ==0 ); +return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) !=0 ); }static bool dm_table_does_not_support_partial_completion (struct dm_table *t) { -return dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_no_partial_completion); +return !dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_partial_completion); } static int device_not_write_same_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Jeffle
Re: [PATCH 4.19.y 3/5] dm table: fix partial completion iterate_devices based device capability checks
Quoted 8 lines · JeffleXu
Hi, Mike,
Would you please spare some time to review the following patches for stable tree?
- [1] for 4.19.y
- [2] for 5.4.y
Quoted 10 lines
While backporting [3] for stable tree, there's some extra code specific to stable tree needs to be fixed, see [4] for the background info.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg448749.html
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg448754.html
[3]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.12-rc2&id=a4c8dd9c2d0987cf542a2a0c42684c9c6d78a04e
[4] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg448760.html
Also hold on until I send a new version. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Jeffle
Quoted 42 lines · Jeffle Xu
Quoted 38 lines
Similar to commit
a4c8dd9c2d09("dm table: fixiterate_devicesbased device capability checks"), fix partial completion capability check and invert logic of the correspondingiterate_devices_callout_fnso that all devices' partial completion capabilities are properly checked.Signed-off-by Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>Fixes 22c11858e800 ("dm: introduce DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED")--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/md/dm-table.c +3
-3@@ -1772,18 +1772,18 @@ static int queue_no_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,return q &&test_bit (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , &q->queue_flags); } -static int device_no_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +static int device_is_partial_completion (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE ];/* For now, NVMe devices are the only devices of this class */ -return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) ==0 ); +return (strncmp (bdevname (dev->bdev, b),"nvme" ,4 ) !=0 ); }static bool dm_table_does_not_support_partial_completion (struct dm_table *t) { -return dm_table_all_devices_attribute (t, device_no_partial_completion); +return !dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_partial_completion); } static int device_not_write_same_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Jeffle
PATCH 4/5 dm table: fix DAX iterate_devices based device capability checks
In reply to Jeffle Xucommit 57ba3e506c30a84b1ba1dd77ddd9f2be9d472e98 upstream.
Fix dm_table_supports_dax() and invert logic of both iterate_devices_callout_fn so that all devices' DAX capabilities are properly checked.
--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 25 ++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
drivers/md/dm-table.c +4 -21
@@ -891,10 +891,10 @@ void dm_table_set_type(struct dm_table *t, enum dm_queue_mode type) }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dm_table_set_type); -static int device_supports_dax (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +static int device_not_dax_capable (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) { -return bdev_dax_supported (dev->bdev,PAGE_SIZE ); +return !bdev_dax_supported (dev->bdev,PAGE_SIZE ); }static bool dm_table_supports_dax (struct dm_table *t)
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t)return false;if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || - !ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_supports_dax,NULL )) + ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_not_dax_capable,NULL ))return false; }
@@ -1731,23 +1731,6 @@ static int device_dax_write_cache_enabled(struct dm_target *ti,return false; } -static int dm_table_supports_dax_write_cache (struct dm_table *t) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (ti->type->iterate_devices && - ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, - device_dax_write_cache_enabled,NULL )) -return true; - } - -return false; -} -static int device_is_rotational (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev,sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {
@@ -1946,7 +1929,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,else blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_DAX , q); -if (dm_table_supports_dax_write_cache (t)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_dax_write_cache_enabled))dax_write_cache (t->md->dax_dev, true);/* Ensure that all underlying devices are non-rotational. */
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH 5/5 dm table: fix zoned iterate_devices based device capability checks
In reply to Jeffle Xucommit 24f6b6036c9eec21191646930ad42808e6180510 upstream.
Fix dm_table_supports_zoned_model() and invert logic of both iterate_devices_callout_fn so that all devices' zoned capabilities are properly checked.
Add one more parameter to dm_table_any_dev_attr(), which is actually used as the @data parameter of iterate_devices_callout_fn, so that dm_table_matches_zone_sectors() can be replaced by dm_table_any_dev_attr().
--- drivers/md/dm-table.c | 52 +++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
drivers/md/dm-table.c +18 -34
@@ -1413,10 +1413,10 @@ struct dm_target *dm_table_find_target(struct dm_table *t, sector_t sector)* should use the iteration structure like dm_table_supports_nowait() or * dm_table_supports_discards(). Or introduce dm_table_all_devs_attr() that * uses an @anti_func that handle semantics of counter examples, e.g. not -* capable of something. So: return !dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, anti_func); +* capable of something. So: return !dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, anti_func, data); */ static bool dm_table_any_dev_attr (struct dm_table *t, -iterate_devices_callout_fn func) +iterate_devices_callout_fn func,void *data) {struct dm_target *ti;unsigned int i;
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ static bool dm_table_any_dev_attr(struct dm_table *t, ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i);if (ti->type->iterate_devices && - ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func,NULL )) + ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, func, data))return true; }
@@ -1468,13 +1468,13 @@ bool dm_table_has_no_data_devices(struct dm_table *table)return true; } -static int device_is_zoned_model (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, -sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) +static int device_not_zoned_model (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {struct request_queue *q =bdev_get_queue (dev->bdev);enum blk_zoned_model *zoned_model = data; -return q &&blk_queue_zoned_model (q) == *zoned_model; +return !q ||blk_queue_zoned_model (q) != *zoned_model; } static bool dm_table_supports_zoned_model(struct dm_table *t,
@@ -1491,37 +1491,20 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_zoned_model(struct dm_table *t,return false;if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || - !ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_is_zoned_model, &zoned_model)) + ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_not_zoned_model, &zoned_model))return false; }return true; } -static int device_matches_zone_sectors (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, -sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) +static int device_not_matches_zone_sectors (struct dm_target *ti,struct dm_dev *dev, +sector_t start,sector_t len,void *data) {struct request_queue *q =bdev_get_queue (dev->bdev);unsigned int *zone_sectors = data; -return q &&blk_queue_zone_sectors (q) == *zone_sectors; -} - -static bool dm_table_matches_zone_sectors (struct dm_table *t, -unsigned int zone_sectors) -{ -struct dm_target *ti; -unsigned i; - -for (i =0 ; i <dm_table_get_num_targets (t); i++) { - ti =dm_table_get_target (t, i); - -if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || - !ti->type->iterate_devices (ti, device_matches_zone_sectors, &zone_sectors)) -return false; - } - -return true; +return !q ||blk_queue_zone_sectors (q) != *zone_sectors; } static int validate_hardware_zoned_model(struct dm_table *table,
@@ -1541,7 +1524,7 @@ static int validate_hardware_zoned_model(struct dm_table *table,if (!zone_sectors || !is_power_of_2 (zone_sectors))return -EINVAL ; -if (!dm_table_matches_zone_sectors (table, zone_sectors)) { +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (table, device_not_matches_zone_sectors, &zone_sectors)) {DMERR ("%s: zone sectors is not consistent across all devices" ,dm_device_name (table->md));return -EINVAL ;
@@ -1766,7 +1749,7 @@ static int device_is_partial_completion(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *devstatic bool dm_table_does_not_support_partial_completion (struct dm_table *t) { -return !dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_partial_completion); +return !dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_partial_completion,NULL ); } static int device_not_write_same_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
@@ -1929,11 +1912,11 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,else blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_DAX , q); -if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_dax_write_cache_enabled)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_dax_write_cache_enabled,NULL ))dax_write_cache (t->md->dax_dev, true);/* Ensure that all underlying devices are non-rotational. */ -if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_rotational)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_rotational,NULL ))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q);else blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT , q);
@@ -1943,7 +1926,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,if (!dm_table_supports_write_zeroes (t)) q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors =0 ; -if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, queue_no_sg_merge)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, queue_no_sg_merge,NULL ))blk_queue_flag_set (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , q);else blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE , q);
@@ -1957,7 +1940,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,* them as well. Only targets that support iterate_devices are considered: * don't want error, zero, etc to require stable pages. */ -if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_requires_stable_pages)) +if (dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_requires_stable_pages,NULL )) q->backing_dev_info->capabilities |=BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES ;else q->backing_dev_info->capabilities &= ~BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES ;
@@ -1968,7 +1951,8 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,* Clear QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if any underlying device does not * have it set. */ -if (blk_queue_add_random (q) &&dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_not_random)) +if (blk_queue_add_random (q) && +dm_table_any_dev_attr (t, device_is_not_random,NULL ))blk_queue_flag_clear (QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM , q); }
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0