FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: fix possible stall on recvmsg()" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 612f71d7328c14369924384ad2170aae2a6abd92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:05:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: fix possible stall on recvmsg()
recvmsg() can enter an infinite loop if the caller provides the MSG_WAITALL, the data present in the receive queue is not sufficient to fulfill the request, and no more data is received by the peer.
When the above happens, mptcp_wait_data() will always return with no wait, as the MPTCP_DATA_READY flag checked by such function is set and never cleared in such code path.
Leveraging the above syzbot was able to trigger an RCU stall:
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 0-...!: (10499 ticks this GP) idle=0af/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=10678/10678 fqs=1
(t=10500 jiffies g=13089 q=109)rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 10497 jiffies! g13089 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1
rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
task:rcu_preempt state:R running task stack:28696 pid: 14 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4955 [inline] __schedule+0x940/0x26f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6236 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6315 schedule_timeout+0x14a/0x2a0 kernel/time/timer.c:1881 rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x186/0x810 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1955 rcu_gp_kthread+0x1de/0x320 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2128 kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1: NMI backtrace for cpu 1 CPU: 1 PID: 8510 Comm: syz-executor827 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-next-20210920-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:bytes_is_nonzero mm/kasan/generic.c:84 [inline] RIP: 0010:memory_is_nonzero mm/kasan/generic.c:102 [inline] RIP: 0010:memory_is_poisoned_n mm/kasan/generic.c:128 [inline] RIP: 0010:memory_is_poisoned mm/kasan/generic.c:159 [inline] RIP: 0010:check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:180 [inline] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0xc8/0x180 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 Code: 38 00 74 ed 48 8d 50 08 eb 09 48 83 c0 01 48 39 d0 74 7a 80 38 00 74 f2 48 89 c2 b8 01 00 00 00 48 85 d2 75 56 5b 5d 41 5c c3 <48> 85 d2 74 5e 48 01 ea eb 09 48 83 c0 01 48 39 d0 74 50 80 38 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000cd676c8 EFLAGS: 00000283 RAX: ffffed100e9a110e RBX: ffffed100e9a110f RCX: ffffffff88ea062a RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff888074d08870 RBP: ffffed100e9a110e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888074d08877 R10: ffffed100e9a110e R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888074d08000 R13: ffff888074d08000 R14: ffff888074d08088 R15: ffff888074d08000 FS: 0000555556d8e300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 S: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000180 CR3: 0000000068909000 CR4: 00000000001506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:101 [inline] test_and_clear_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h:83 [inline] mptcp_release_cb+0x14a/0x210 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3016 release_sock+0xb4/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3204 mptcp_wait_data net/mptcp/protocol.c:1770 [inline] mptcp_recvmsg+0xfd1/0x27b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2080 inet6_recvmsg+0x11b/0x5e0 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:659 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:944 [inline] ____sys_recvmsg+0x527/0x600 net/socket.c:2626 ___sys_recvmsg+0x127/0x200 net/socket.c:2670 do_recvmmsg+0x24d/0x6d0 net/socket.c:2764 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2843 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2866 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2859 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x20b/0x260 net/socket.c:2859 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc200d2dc39 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 41 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc5758e5a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fc200d2dc39 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00000000200017c0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000f0b5ff R10: 0000000000000100 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 00007ffc5758e5d0 R14: 00007ffc5758e5c0 R15: 0000000000000003
Fix the issue by replacing the MPTCP_DATA_READY bit with direct inspection of the msk receive queue.
net/mptcp/protocol.c +15 -40
@@ -528,7 +528,6 @@ static bool mptcp_check_data_fin(struct sock *sk) sk->sk_shutdown |=RCV_SHUTDOWN ;smp_mb__before_atomic ();/* SHUTDOWN must be visible first */ -set_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags);switch (sk->sk_state) {case TCP_ESTABLISHED :
@@ -742,10 +741,9 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)/* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */ mptcp_data_lock (sk); -if (move_skbs_to_msk (msk, ssk)) { -set_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags); +if (move_skbs_to_msk (msk, ssk)) sk->sk_data_ready (sk); - } +mptcp_data_unlock (sk); }
@@ -847,7 +845,6 @@ static void mptcp_check_for_eof(struct mptcp_sock *msk) sk->sk_shutdown |=RCV_SHUTDOWN ;smp_mb__before_atomic ();/* SHUTDOWN must be visible first */ -set_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags); sk->sk_data_ready (sk); }
@@ -1759,21 +1756,6 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)return copied ? : ret; } -static void mptcp_wait_data (struct sock *sk,long *timeo) -{ -DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC (wait, woken_wake_function); -struct mptcp_sock *msk =mptcp_sk (sk); - -add_wait_queue (sk_sleep (sk), &wait); -sk_set_bit (SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA , sk); - -sk_wait_event (sk, timeo, -test_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags), &wait); - -sk_clear_bit (SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA , sk); -remove_wait_queue (sk_sleep (sk), &wait); -} - static int __mptcp_recvmsg_mskq(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int flags,
@@ -2077,19 +2059,7 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, }pr_debug ("block timeout %ld" , timeo); -mptcp_wait_data (sk, &timeo); - } - -if (skb_queue_empty_lockless (&sk->sk_receive_queue) && -skb_queue_empty (&msk->receive_queue)) { -/* entire backlog drained, clear DATA_READY. */ -clear_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags); - -/* .. race-breaker: ssk might have gotten new data -* after last __mptcp_move_skbs() returned false. -*/ -if (unlikely (__mptcp_move_skbs (msk))) -set_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags); +sk_wait_data (sk, &timeo,NULL ); } out_err:
@@ -2098,9 +2068,9 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,tcp_recv_timestamp (msg, sk, &tss); } -pr_debug ("msk=%p data_ready=%d rx queue empty=%d copied=%d" , - msk,test_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags), -skb_queue_empty_lockless (&sk->sk_receive_queue), copied); +pr_debug ("msk=%p rx queue empty=%d:%d copied=%d" , + msk,skb_queue_empty_lockless (&sk->sk_receive_queue), +skb_queue_empty (&msk->receive_queue), copied);if (!(flags &MSG_PEEK ))mptcp_rcv_space_adjust (msk, copied);
@@ -2368,7 +2338,6 @@ static void mptcp_check_fastclose(struct mptcp_sock *msk)inet_sk_state_store (sk,TCP_CLOSE ); sk->sk_shutdown =SHUTDOWN_MASK ;smp_mb__before_atomic ();/* SHUTDOWN must be visible first */ -set_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags);set_bit (MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW , &msk->flags);mptcp_close_wake_up (sk);
@@ -3385,8 +3354,14 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,static __poll_t mptcp_check_readable (struct mptcp_sock *msk) { -return test_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags) ?EPOLLIN |EPOLLRDNORM : -0 ; +/* Concurrent splices from sk_receive_queue into receive_queue will +* always show at least one non-empty queue when checked in this order. +*/ +if (skb_queue_empty_lockless (&((struct sock *)msk)->sk_receive_queue) && +skb_queue_empty_lockless (&msk->receive_queue)) +return 0 ; + +return EPOLLIN |EPOLLRDNORM ; }static __poll_t mptcp_check_writeable (struct mptcp_sock *msk)
@@ -3421,7 +3396,7 @@ static __poll_t mptcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, state =inet_sk_state_load (sk);pr_debug ("msk=%p state=%d flags=%lx" , msk, state, msk->flags);if (state ==TCP_LISTEN ) -return mptcp_check_readable (msk); +return test_bit (MPTCP_DATA_READY , &msk->flags) ?EPOLLIN |EPOLLRDNORM :0 ;if (state !=TCP_SYN_SENT && state !=TCP_SYN_RECV ) { mask |=mptcp_check_readable (msk);