Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Apr 3, 2022

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 3b67db8a6ca83e6ff90b756d3da0c966f61cd37b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhihao Cheng <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:22:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private

MM defined the rule [1] very clearly that once page was set with PG_private flag, we should increment the refcount in that page, also main flows like pageout(), migrate_page() will assume there is one additional page reference count if page_has_private() returns true. Otherwise, we may get a BUG in page migration:

page:0000000080d05b9d refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000005f4d82a8 index:0xe2 pfn:0x14c12
aops:ubifs_file_address_operations [ubifs] ino:8f1 dentry name:"f30e"
flags: 0x1fffff80002405(locked|uptodate|owner_priv_1|private|node=0| zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)

  page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 0)
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at include/linux/page_ref.h:184!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 3 PID: 38 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5
  RIP: 0010:migrate_page_move_mapping+0xac3/0xe70
  Call Trace:
    ubifs_migrate_page+0x22/0xc0 [ubifs]
    move_to_new_page+0xb4/0x600
    migrate_pages+0x1523/0x1cc0
    compact_zone+0x8c5/0x14b0
    kcompactd+0x2bc/0x560
    kthread+0x18c/0x1e0
    ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

Before the time, we should make clean a concept, what does refcount means in page gotten from grab_cache_page_write_begin(). There are 2 situations:
Situation 1: refcount is 3, page is created by __page_cache_alloc.
TYPE_A - the write process is using this page
TYPE_B - page is assigned to one certain mapping by calling

	   __add_to_page_cache_locked()

TYPE_C - page is added into pagevec list corresponding current cpu by
calling lru_cache_add()
Situation 2: refcount is 2, page is gotten from the mapping's tree
TYPE_B - page has been assigned to one certain mapping TYPE_A - the write process is using this page (by calling
page_cache_get_speculative())
Filesystem releases one refcount by calling put_page() in xxx_write_end(), the released refcount corresponds to TYPE_A (write task is using it). If there are any processes using a page, page migration process will skip the page by judging whether expected_page_refs() equals to page refcount.

The BUG is caused by following process:
PA(cpu 0) kcompactd(cpu 1)
compact_zone
ubifs_write_begin
page_a = grab_cache_page_write_begin
add_to_page_cache_lru
lru_cache_add
pagevec_add // put page into cpu 0's pagevec
(refcnf = 3, for page creation process)
ubifs_write_end
SetPagePrivate(page_a) // doesn't increase page count ! unlock_page(page_a)
put_page(page_a) // refcnt = 2

				[...]

    PB(cpu 0)

filemap_read
filemap_get_pages
add_to_page_cache_lru
lru_cache_add
__pagevec_lru_add // traverse all pages in cpu 0's pagevec
__pagevec_lru_add_fn
SetPageLRU(page_a)
isolate_migratepages
isolate_migratepages_block
get_page_unless_zero(page_a) // refcnt = 3
list_add(page_a, from_list)
migrate_pages(from_list)
__unmap_and_move
move_to_new_page
ubifs_migrate_page(page_a)
migrate_page_move_mapping
expected_page_refs get 3
(migration[1] + mapping[1] + private[1])
release_pages
put_page_testzero(page_a) // refcnt = 3
page_ref_freeze // refcnt = 0
page_ref_dec_and_test(0 - 1 = -1)
page_ref_unfreeze
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(-1 != 0, page)

UBIFS doesn't increase the page refcount after setting private flag, which leads to page migration task believes the page is not used by any other processes, so the page is migrated. This causes concurrent accessing on page refcount between put_page() called by other process(eg. read process calls lru_cache_add) and page_ref_unfreeze() called by migration task.

Actually zhangjun has tried to fix this problem [2] by recalculating page refcnt in ubifs_migrate_page(). It's better to follow MM rules [1], because just like Kirill suggested in [2], we need to check all users of page_has_private() helper. Like f2fs does in [3], fix it by adding/deleting refcount when setting/clearing private for a page. BTW, according to [4], we set 'page->private' as 1 because ubifs just simply SetPagePrivate(). And, [5] provided a common helper to set/clear page private, ubifs can use this helper following the example of iomap, afs, btrfs, etc.

Jump [6] to find a reproducer.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mtd/msg04018.html
[3] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1903.0/03313.html
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/[email protected]
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
[6] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214961

Fixes 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
fs/ubifs/file.c +7 -7
index 5cfa28cd00cd..6b45a037a047 100644
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static int ubifs_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
 	}
 
 	if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
-		SetPagePrivate(page);
+		attach_page_private(page, (void *)1);
 		atomic_long_inc(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
 		__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
 	}
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static int do_writepage(struct page *page, int len)
 		release_existing_page_budget(c);
 
 	atomic_long_dec(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
-	ClearPagePrivate(page);
+	detach_page_private(page);
 	ClearPageChecked(page);
 
 	kunmap(page);
@@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ static void ubifs_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
 		release_existing_page_budget(c);
 
 	atomic_long_dec(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
-	ClearPagePrivate(page);
+	detach_page_private(page);
 	ClearPageChecked(page);
 }
 
@@ -1471,8 +1471,8 @@ static int ubifs_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
 		return rc;
 
 	if (PagePrivate(page)) {
-		ClearPagePrivate(page);
-		SetPagePrivate(newpage);
+		detach_page_private(page);
+		attach_page_private(newpage, (void *)1);
 	}
 
 	if (mode != MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY)
@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static int ubifs_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t unused_gfp_flags)
 		return 0;
 	ubifs_assert(c, PagePrivate(page));
 	ubifs_assert(c, 0);
-	ClearPagePrivate(page);
+	detach_page_private(page);
 	ClearPageChecked(page);
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static vm_fault_t ubifs_vm_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	else {
 		if (!PageChecked(page))
 			ubifs_convert_page_budget(c);
-		SetPagePrivate(page);
+		attach_page_private(page, (void *)1);
 		atomic_long_inc(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
 		__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
 	}