Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ceph: check folio PG_private bit instead of folio->private" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message May 16, 2022

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 642d51fb0775a41dd6bb3d99b5a40c24df131c20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiubo Li <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 18:53:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ceph: check folio PG_private bit instead of folio->private

The pages in the file mapping maybe reclaimed and reused by other subsystems and the page->private maybe used as flags field or something else, if later that pages are used by page caches again the page->private maybe not cleared as expected.

Here will check the PG_private bit instead of the folio->private.

Cc: [email protected]
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55421

fs/ceph/addr.c +7 -4
index aa25bffd4823..b6edcf89a429 100644
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool ceph_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
 	if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
 		dout("%p dirty_folio %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n",
 		     mapping->host, folio, folio->index);
-		BUG_ON(!folio_get_private(folio));
+		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_private(folio), folio);
 		return false;
 	}
 
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static bool ceph_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
 	 * Reference snap context in folio->private.  Also set
 	 * PagePrivate so that we get invalidate_folio callback.
 	 */
-	BUG_ON(folio_get_private(folio));
+	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_private(folio), folio);
 	folio_attach_private(folio, snapc);
 
 	return ceph_fscache_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void ceph_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
 	}
 
 	WARN_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio));
-	if (folio_get_private(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_private(folio)) {
 		dout("%p invalidate_folio idx %lu full dirty page\n",
 		     inode, folio->index);
 
@@ -729,8 +729,11 @@ static void writepages_finish(struct ceph_osd_request *req)
 
 	/* clean all pages */
 	for (i = 0; i < req->r_num_ops; i++) {
-		if (req->r_ops[i].op != CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE)
+		if (req->r_ops[i].op != CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE) {
+			pr_warn("%s incorrect op %d req %p index %d tid %llu\n",
+				__func__, req->r_ops[i].op, req, i, req->r_tid);
 			break;
+		}
 
 		osd_data = osd_req_op_extent_osd_data(req, i);
 		BUG_ON(osd_data->type != CEPH_OSD_DATA_TYPE_PAGES);