FAILED: patch "[PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing" failed to apply to 5.19-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 5.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Possible dependencies:
8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing") 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8f7e001e0325de63a42f23342ac3b8139150c5cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:48:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing
This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could fire on an uninitialized hart ID.
The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before enabling Zicbom support.
arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c +1 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static bool errata_probe_cmo(unsigned int stage,if (stage ==RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT )return false; + riscv_cbom_block_size =L1_CACHE_BYTES ;riscv_noncoherent_supported ();return true;#else
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +1 -0
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (void );#else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (void ) { }
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c +1 -1
@@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)setup_smp ();#endif -riscv_fill_hwcap ();riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (); +riscv_fill_hwcap ();apply_boot_alternatives (); }
arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c +13 -10
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> -static unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size =L1_CACHE_BYTES ; +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;static bool noncoherent_supported; void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
@@ -79,38 +79,41 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (void ) {struct device_node *node; +unsigned long cbom_hartid; +u32 val, probed_block_size;int ret; -u32 val; + probed_block_size =0 ;for_each_of_cpu_node (node) {unsigned long hartid; -int cbom_hartid; ret =riscv_of_processor_hartid (node, &hartid);if (ret)continue ; -if (hartid <0 ) -continue ; -/* set block-size for cbom extension if available */ ret =of_property_read_u32 (node,"riscv,cbom-block-size" , &val);if (ret)continue ; -if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) { - riscv_cbom_block_size = val; +if (!probed_block_size) { + probed_block_size = val; cbom_hartid = hartid; }else { -if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val) -pr_warn ("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n" , +if (probed_block_size != val) +pr_warn ("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n" , cbom_hartid, hartid); } } + +if (probed_block_size) + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size; }#endif void riscv_noncoherent_supported (void ) { +WARN (!riscv_cbom_block_size, +"Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n" ); noncoherent_supported = true; }
Quoted 6 lines · On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 10:38:53AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Quoted 6 lines
Possible dependencies:
8f7e001e0325("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
3aefb2ee5bdd("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
This is a feature not a fix, I think the CC: stable tag may have been a mistake here - zicbom only landed this cycle.
Thanks,
Conor.
Quoted 142 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From
8f7e001e0325de63a42f23342ac3b8139150c5cfMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:48:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probingThis fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could fire on an uninitialized hart ID.
The biggest change here is that
riscv_cbom_block_sizeis no longer initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before enabling Zicbom support.CC Andrew Jones <[email protected]>CC Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>CC Atish Patra <[email protected]>Fixes 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")Fixes 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension")Reported-by kernel test robot <[email protected]>Reported-by Conor Dooley <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>[Conor: fixed the redefinition errors]Tested-by Conor Dooley <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Conor Dooley <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c +1
-0@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static bool errata_probe_cmo(unsigned int stage,if (stage ==RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT )return false; + riscv_cbom_block_size =L1_CACHE_BYTES ;riscv_noncoherent_supported ();return true;#else arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h +1
-0@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM +extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (void );#else static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (void ) { }arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c +1
-1@@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)setup_smp ();#endif -riscv_fill_hwcap ();riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (); +riscv_fill_hwcap ();apply_boot_alternatives (); }arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c +13
-10@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> -static unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size =L1_CACHE_BYTES ; +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;static bool noncoherent_supported; void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,@@ -79,38 +79,41 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize (void ) {struct device_node *node; +unsigned long cbom_hartid; +u32 val, probed_block_size;int ret; -u32 val; + probed_block_size =0 ;for_each_of_cpu_node (node) {unsigned long hartid; -int cbom_hartid; ret =riscv_of_processor_hartid (node, &hartid);if (ret)continue ; -if (hartid <0 ) -continue ; -/* set block-size for cbom extension if available */ ret =of_property_read_u32 (node,"riscv,cbom-block-size" , &val);if (ret)continue ; -if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) { - riscv_cbom_block_size = val; +if (!probed_block_size) { + probed_block_size = val; cbom_hartid = hartid; }else { -if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val) -pr_warn ("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n" , +if (probed_block_size != val) +pr_warn ("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n" , cbom_hartid, hartid); } } + +if (probed_block_size) + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size; }#endif void riscv_noncoherent_supported (void ) { +WARN (!riscv_cbom_block_size, +"Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n" ); noncoherent_supported = true; }