Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/net: fix notif cqe reordering" failed to apply to 6.0-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Oct 16, 2022

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.0-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

Possible dependencies:

108893ddcc4d ("io_uring/net: fix notif cqe reordering") 6ae91ac9a6aa ("io_uring/net: don't skip notifs for failed requests") a75155faef4e ("io_uring/net: fix UAF in io_sendrecv_fail()") 493108d95f14 ("io_uring/net: zerocopy sendmsg") c4c0009e0b56 ("io_uring/net: combine fail handlers") b0e9b5517eb1 ("io_uring/net: rename io_sendzc()") 516e82f0e043 ("io_uring/net: support non-zerocopy sendto") 6ae61b7aa2c7 ("io_uring/net: refactor io_setup_async_addr") 5693bcce892d ("io_uring/net: don't lose partial send_zc on fail") 7e6b638ed501 ("io_uring/net: don't lose partial send/recv on fail") ac9e5784bbe7 ("io_uring/net: use io_sr_msg for sendzc") 0b048557db76 ("io_uring/net: refactor io_sr_msg types") 6bf8ad25fcd4 ("io_uring/net: io_async_msghdr caches for sendzc") 95eafc74be5e ("io_uring/net: reshuffle error handling")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 108893ddcc4d3aa0a4a02aeb02d478e997001227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:23:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/net: fix notif cqe reordering

send zc is not restricted to !IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED anymore and so we can't use task-tw ordering trick to order notification cqes with requests completions. In this case leave it alone and let io_send_zc_cleanup() flush it.

io_uring/net.c +19 -5
index 604eac5f7a34..caa6a803cb72 100644
@@ -1127,8 +1127,14 @@ int io_send_zc(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	else if (zc->done_io)
 		ret = zc->done_io;
 
-	io_notif_flush(zc->notif);
-	req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
+	/*
+	 * If we're in io-wq we can't rely on tw ordering guarantees, defer
+	 * flushing notif to io_send_zc_cleanup()
+	 */
+	if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)) {
+		io_notif_flush(zc->notif);
+		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
+	}
 	io_req_set_res(req, ret, IORING_CQE_F_MORE);
 	return IOU_OK;
 }
@@ -1182,8 +1188,10 @@ int io_sendmsg_zc(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 		req_set_fail(req);
 	}
 	/* fast path, check for non-NULL to avoid function call */
-	if (kmsg->free_iov)
+	if (kmsg->free_iov) {
 		kfree(kmsg->free_iov);
+		kmsg->free_iov = NULL;
+	}
 
 	io_netmsg_recycle(req, issue_flags);
 	if (ret >= 0)
@@ -1191,8 +1199,14 @@ int io_sendmsg_zc(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	else if (sr->done_io)
 		ret = sr->done_io;
 
-	io_notif_flush(sr->notif);
-	req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
+	/*
+	 * If we're in io-wq we can't rely on tw ordering guarantees, defer
+	 * flushing notif to io_send_zc_cleanup()
+	 */
+	if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)) {
+		io_notif_flush(sr->notif);
+		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
+	}
 	io_req_set_res(req, ret, IORING_CQE_F_MORE);
 	return IOU_OK;
 }