FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Possible dependencies:
4313e5a61304 ("tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed") 5448d44c3855 ("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 4313e5a613049dfc1819a6dfb5f94cf2caff9452 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:14:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the "type" field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other events). A type number is the identifier of the binary blobs in the tracing ring buffer (known as events) to map them to logic that can parse the binary blob.
The issue is that if a dynamic event (like a kprobe event) is traced and is in the ring buffer, and then that event is removed (because it is dynamic, which means it can be created and destroyed), if another dynamic event is created that has the same number that new event's logic on parsing the binary blob will be used.
To show how this can be an issue, the following can crash the kernel:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing
# for i in `seq 65536`; do
echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 $arg1:u32' > kprobe_events
# doneFor every iteration of the above, the writing to the kprobe_events will remove the old event and create a new one (with the same format) and increase the type number to the next available on until the type number reaches over 65535 which is the max number for the 16 bit type. After it reaches that number, the logic to allocate a new number simply looks for the next available number. When an dynamic event is removed, that number is then available to be reused by the next dynamic event created. That is, once the above reaches the max number, the number assigned to the event in that loop will remain the same.
Now that means deleting one dynamic event and created another will reuse the previous events type number. This is where bad things can happen. After the above loop finishes, the kprobes/foo event which reads the do_sys_openat2 function call's first parameter as an integer.
# echo 1 > kprobes/foo/enable
# cat /etc/passwd > /dev/null
# cat trace
cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849603: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196
cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849620: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196
cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849838: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196
cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849880: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196
# echo 0 > kprobes/foo/enableNow if we delete the kprobe and create a new one that reads a string:
# echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 +0($arg2):string' > kprobe_events
And now we can the trace:
# cat trace
sendmail-1942 [002] ..... 530.136320: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930817: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������"
cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930961: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������"
cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934278: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������"
cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934563: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������"
bash-1515 [007] ..... 534.299093: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1="kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk���������@��4Z����;Y�����UAnd dmesg has:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in string+0xd4/0x1c0
Read of size 1 at addr ffff88805fdbbfa0 by task cat/2049
CPU: 0 PID: 2049 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-test+ #641
Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v03.03 07/14/2016
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x77
print_report+0x17f/0x47b
kasan_report+0xad/0x130
string+0xd4/0x1c0
vsnprintf+0x500/0x840
seq_buf_vprintf+0x62/0xc0
trace_seq_printf+0x10e/0x1e0
print_type_string+0x90/0xa0
print_kprobe_event+0x16b/0x290
print_trace_line+0x451/0x8e0
s_show+0x72/0x1f0
seq_read_iter+0x58e/0x750
seq_read+0x115/0x160
vfs_read+0x11d/0x460
ksys_read+0xa9/0x130
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fc2e972ade2
Code: c0 e9 b2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d b2 3f 0a 00 e8 05 f0 01 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24
RSP: 002b:00007ffc64e687c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007fc2e972ade2
RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007fc2e980d000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fc2e980d000 R08: 00007fc2e980c010 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000020f00
R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000
</TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page:ffffea00017f6ec0 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x5fdbb
flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
raw: 000fffffc0000000 0000000000000000 ffffea00017f6ec8 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff88805fdbbe80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ffff88805fdbbf00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>ffff88805fdbbf80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
^
ffff88805fdbc000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ffff88805fdbc080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
==================================================================This was found when Zheng Yejian sent a patch to convert the event type number assignment to use IDA, which gives the next available number, and this bug showed up in the fuzz testing by Yujie Liu and the kernel test robot. But after further analysis, I found that this behavior is the same as when the event type numbers go past the 16bit max (and the above shows that).
As modules have a similar issue, but is dealt with by setting a "WAS_ENABLED" flag when a module event is enabled, and when the module is freed, if any of its events were enabled, the ring buffer that holds that event is also cleared, to prevent reading stale events. The same can be done for dynamic events.
If any dynamic event that is being removed was enabled, then make sure the buffers they were enabled in are now cleared.
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Depends-on: e18eb8783ec49 ("tracing: Add tracing_reset_all_online_cpus_unlocked() function")
Depends-on: 5448d44c38557 ("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")
Depends-on: 6212dd29683ee ("tracing/kprobes: Use dyn_event framework for kprobe events")
Depends-on: 065e63f951432 ("tracing: Only have rmmod clear buffers that its events were active in")
Depends-on: 575380da8b469 ("tracing: Only clear trace buffer on module unload if event was traced")
kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c +2 -0
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ int dyn_event_release(const char *raw_command, struct dyn_event_operations *typeif (ret)break ; } +tracing_reset_all_online_cpus ();mutex_unlock (&event_mutex); out:argv_free (argv);
@@ -214,6 +215,7 @@ int dyn_events_release_all(struct dyn_event_operations *type)break ; } out: +tracing_reset_all_online_cpus ();mutex_unlock (&event_mutex);return ret;
kernel/trace/trace_events.c +10 -1
@@ -2880,7 +2880,10 @@ static int probe_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)* TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER. */ if (file->flags &EVENT_FILE_FL_ENABLED ) -return -EBUSY ; + goto busy; + +if (file->flags &EVENT_FILE_FL_WAS_ENABLED ) + tr->clear_trace = true;/* * The do_for_each_event_file_safe() is * a double loop. After finding the call for this
@@ -2893,6 +2896,12 @@ static int probe_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)__trace_remove_event_call (call);return 0 ; + busy: +/* No need to clear the trace now */ +list_for_each_entry (tr, &ftrace_trace_arrays, list) { + tr->clear_trace = false; + } +return -EBUSY ; }/* Remove an event_call */
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:20:15 +0100 <[email protected]> wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.Possible dependencies:
4313e5a61304("tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed")
Hmm, isn't the above the patch that failed to apply?
Quoted 1 line
5448d44c3855("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")
And this is mentioned below.
[..]
Quoted 11 lines
If any dynamic event that is being removed was enabled, then make sure the buffers they were enabled in are now cleared.
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Depends-on:e18eb8783ec49("tracing: Addtracing_reset_all_online_cpus_unlocked()function")Depends-on:
5448d44c38557("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")
^^^
-- Steve
Quoted 59 lines
Depends-on:
6212dd29683ee("tracing/kprobes: Usedyn_eventframework for kprobe events")
Depends-on:065e63f951432("tracing: Only have rmmod clear buffers that its events were active in")
Depends-on:575380da8b469("tracing: Only clear trace buffer on module unload if event was traced")Fixes 77b44d1b7c283 ("tracing/kprobes: Rename Kprobe-tracer to kprobe-event")Reported-by Zheng Yejian <[email protected]>Reported-by Yujie Liu <[email protected]>Reported-by kernel test robot <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c +2
-0@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ int dyn_event_release(const char *raw_command, struct dyn_event_operations *typeif (ret)break ; } +tracing_reset_all_online_cpus ();mutex_unlock (&event_mutex); out:argv_free (argv);@@ -214,6 +215,7 @@ int dyn_events_release_all(struct dyn_event_operations *type)break ; } out: +tracing_reset_all_online_cpus ();mutex_unlock (&event_mutex);return ret;kernel/trace/trace_events.c +10
-1@@ -2880,7 +2880,10 @@ static int probe_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)* TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER. */ if (file->flags &EVENT_FILE_FL_ENABLED ) -return -EBUSY ; + goto busy; + +if (file->flags &EVENT_FILE_FL_WAS_ENABLED ) + tr->clear_trace = true;/* * The do_for_each_event_file_safe() is * a double loop. After finding the call for this @@ -2893,6 +2896,12 @@ static int probe_remove_event_call(struct trace_event_call *call)__trace_remove_event_call (call);return 0 ; + busy: +/* No need to clear the trace now */ +list_for_each_entry (tr, &ftrace_trace_arrays, list) { + tr->clear_trace = false; + } +return -EBUSY ; }/* Remove an event_call */
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 5 lines · On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:20:15 +0100 <[email protected]> wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Possible dependencies:
4313e5a61304("tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed")Hmm, isn't the above the patch that failed to apply?
yes, tools are not the smartest at times :)
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 1 line
5448d44c3855("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")And this is mentioned below.
[..]
Quoted 6 lines
If any dynamic event that is being removed was enabled, then make sure the buffers they were enabled in are now cleared.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Depends-on:e18eb8783ec49("tracing: Addtracing_reset_all_online_cpus_unlocked()function")Depends-on:
5448d44c38557("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")^^^
Did you just make up a new field? We have a documented way to show dependancies for stable patches, please let's not create a new one :(
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Depends-on:
6212dd29683ee("tracing/kprobes: Usedyn_eventframework for kprobe events")
Depends-on:065e63f951432("tracing: Only have rmmod clear buffers that its events were active in")
Depends-on:575380da8b469("tracing: Only clear trace buffer on module unload if event was traced")Fixes 77b44d1b7c283 ("tracing/kprobes: Rename Kprobe-tracer to kprobe-event")
Adding the "unified framework" seems like way too much for a stable patch, are you sure all of these are required and should be applied to 4.19.y?
thanks,
greg k-h
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 16 lines · On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 09:21:23 +0100 Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 1 line
5448d44c3855("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")And this is mentioned below.
[..]
Quoted 9 lines
If any dynamic event that is being removed was enabled, then make sure the buffers they were enabled in are now cleared.
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Depends-on:e18eb8783ec49("tracing: Addtracing_reset_all_online_cpus_unlocked()function")
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Depends-on:
5448d44c38557("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")^^^
Did you just make up a new field? We have a documented way to show dependancies for stable patches, please let's not create a new one :(
Ug, I've seen this tag used before:
example: e3f0c638f428fd66b5871154b62706772045f91a
And just assumed that was the method. I guess I should have looked deeper.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Depends-on:
6212dd29683ee("tracing/kprobes: Usedyn_eventframework for kprobe events")
Depends-on:065e63f951432("tracing: Only have rmmod clear buffers that its events were active in")
Depends-on:575380da8b469("tracing: Only clear trace buffer on module unload if event was traced")Fixes 77b44d1b7c283 ("tracing/kprobes: Rename Kprobe-tracer to kprobe-event")Adding the "unified framework" seems like way too much for a stable patch, are you sure all of these are required and should be applied to 4.19.y?
It's that balance between rewriting it to the bare minimum, which is not as intrusive, but tested much less and may be even more buggy, to backporting a larger change that has been verified by real world use cases.
Or we just do not backport it. The bug will still exist, but you really have to work hard to hit it. And because it's only controlled by privileged users, maybe it's OK to just ignore it. I think I've seen only one report of this issue in the last 10 years.
Thoughts?
-- Steve
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 47 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 16 lines · On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 09:21:23 +0100 Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 1 line
5448d44c3855("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")And this is mentioned below.
[..]
Quoted 9 lines
If any dynamic event that is being removed was enabled, then make sure the buffers they were enabled in are now cleared.
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Depends-on:e18eb8783ec49("tracing: Addtracing_reset_all_online_cpus_unlocked()function")Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Depends-on:
5448d44c38557("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")^^^
Did you just make up a new field? We have a documented way to show dependancies for stable patches, please let's not create a new one :(
Ug, I've seen this tag used before:
example:
e3f0c638f428fd66b5871154b62706772045f91aAnd just assumed that was the method. I guess I should have looked deeper.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Depends-on:
6212dd29683ee("tracing/kprobes: Usedyn_eventframework for kprobe events")
Depends-on:065e63f951432("tracing: Only have rmmod clear buffers that its events were active in")
Depends-on:575380da8b469("tracing: Only clear trace buffer on module unload if event was traced")Fixes 77b44d1b7c283 ("tracing/kprobes: Rename Kprobe-tracer to kprobe-event")Adding the "unified framework" seems like way too much for a stable patch, are you sure all of these are required and should be applied to 4.19.y?
It's that balance between rewriting it to the bare minimum, which is not as intrusive, but tested much less and may be even more buggy, to backporting a larger change that has been verified by real world use cases.
Quoted 6 lines
Or we just do not backport it. The bug will still exist, but you really have to work hard to hit it. And because it's only controlled by privileged users, maybe it's OK to just ignore it. I think I've seen only one report of this issue in the last 10 years.
Thoughts?
Sasha backported this to 5.4 and newer without needing the full new feature to be added, so I think we are now ok.
thanks,
greg k-h
Steven Rostedt
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 17:34:15 +0100 Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Depends-on:
5448d44c38557("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")^^^
Did you just make up a new field? We have a documented way to show dependancies for stable patches, please let's not create a new one :(
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Ug, I've seen this tag used before:
example:
e3f0c638f428fd66b5871154b62706772045f91aAnd just assumed that was the method. I guess I should have looked deeper.
I may need to denote patches again that are to be marked for stable but depend on other commits. I'm looking for the "proper" way to do this so that your scripts pick this up.
I searched Documentation for "depends" and the only thing I see in there is in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
If one patch depends on another patch in order for a change to be complete, that is OK. Simply note **"this patch depends on patch X"** in your patch description.
But that looks to be used for a patch that depends on some other patch in the series. I'm doing something that will depend on an existing commit. And do your scripts pick up on that line anyway?
Where's this documented way to show dependencies for stable patches?
-- Steve
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 28 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 7 lines · On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 17:34:15 +0100 Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Depends-on:
5448d44c38557("tracing: Add unified dynamic event framework")^^^
Did you just make up a new field? We have a documented way to show dependancies for stable patches, please let's not create a new one :(
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Ug, I've seen this tag used before:
example:
e3f0c638f428fd66b5871154b62706772045f91aAnd just assumed that was the method. I guess I should have looked deeper.
I may need to denote patches again that are to be marked for stable but depend on other commits. I'm looking for the "proper" way to do this so that your scripts pick this up.
I searched Documentation for "depends" and the only thing I see in there is in
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:If one patch depends on another patch in order for a change to be complete, that is OK. Simply note **"this patch depends on patch X"** in your patch description.
Quoted 5 lines
But that looks to be used for a patch that depends on some other patch in the series. I'm doing something that will depend on an existing commit. And do your scripts pick up on that line anyway?
Where's this documented way to show dependencies for stable patches?
Please see:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly, specifically the section below "Option 3" that starts with, "Additionally, some patches submitted..."
does that help?
thanks,
greg k-h
Sasha Levin
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 5 lines · On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:20:15 +0100 <[email protected]> wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Possible dependencies:
4313e5a61304("tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed")Hmm, isn't the above the patch that failed to apply?
yes, tools are not the smartest at times :)
It's just what the script does: it always lists the commit we actually want to apply, makes it easier for the rest of my scripts :)
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Sasha