Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: always prep_async for drain requests" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 2 participants 4 messages Jan 29, 2023 – Jan 30, 2023

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

Possible dependencies:

ef5c600adb1d ("io_uring: always prep_async for drain requests") 973fc83f3a94 ("io_uring: defer all io_req_complete_failed") 1bec951c3809 ("io_uring: iopoll protect complete_post") fa18fa2272c7 ("io_uring: inline __io_req_complete_put()") e276ae344a77 ("io_uring: hold locks for io_req_complete_failed") f9d567c75ec2 ("io_uring: inline __io_req_complete_post()")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From ef5c600adb1d985513d2b612cc90403a148ff287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:59:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: always prep_async for drain requests

Drain requests all go through io_drain_req, which has a quick exit in case there is nothing pending (ie the drain is not useful). In that case it can run the issue the request immediately.

However for safety it queues it through task work.
The problem is that in this case the request is run asynchronously, but the async work has not been prepared through io_req_prep_async.

This has not been a problem up to now, as the task work always would run before returning to userspace, and so the user would not have a chance to race with it.

However - with IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN - this is no longer the case and the work might be defered, giving userspace a chance to change data being referred to in the request.

Instead _always_ prep_async for drain requests, which is simpler anyway and removes this issue.

Fixes c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
io_uring/io_uring.c +8 -10
index 0a4efada9b3c..db623b3185c8 100644
@@ -1765,17 +1765,12 @@ static __cold void io_drain_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
-	ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
-	if (ret) {
-fail:
-		io_req_defer_failed(req, ret);
-		return;
-	}
 	io_prep_async_link(req);
 	de = kmalloc(sizeof(*de), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!de) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto fail;
+		io_req_defer_failed(req, ret);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
@@ -2048,13 +2043,16 @@ static void io_queue_sqe_fallback(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HARDLINK;
 		req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
 		io_req_defer_failed(req, req->cqe.res);
-	} else if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active)) {
-		io_drain_req(req);
 	} else {
 		int ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
 
-		if (unlikely(ret))
+		if (unlikely(ret)) {
 			io_req_defer_failed(req, ret);
+			return;
+		}
+
+		if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active))
+			io_drain_req(req);
 		else
 			io_queue_iowq(req, NULL);
 	}
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · On 1/29/23 6:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

This should do it.

Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe

From 71a58ab8cf1bb4b4c286fbabe266a82bab20fdf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 12:34:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: always prep_async for drain requests

commit ef5c600adb1d985513d2b612cc90403a148ff287 upstream.

Drain requests all go through io_drain_req, which has a quick exit in case there is nothing pending (ie the drain is not useful). In that case it can run the issue the request immediately.

However for safety it queues it through task work.
The problem is that in this case the request is run asynchronously, but the async work has not been prepared through io_req_prep_async.

This has not been a problem up to now, as the task work always would run before returning to userspace, and so the user would not have a chance to race with it.

However - with IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN - this is no longer the case and the work might be defered, giving userspace a chance to change data being referred to in the request.

Instead _always_ prep_async for drain requests, which is simpler anyway and removes this issue.

Fixes c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
io_uring/io_uring.c +8 -10
index cea5de98c423..6fc4aaef5fe2 100644
@@ -1658,17 +1658,12 @@ static __cold void io_drain_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
-	ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
-	if (ret) {
-fail:
-		io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
-		return;
-	}
 	io_prep_async_link(req);
 	de = kmalloc(sizeof(*de), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!de) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto fail;
+		io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
@@ -1942,13 +1937,16 @@ static void io_queue_sqe_fallback(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HARDLINK;
 		req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
 		io_req_complete_failed(req, req->cqe.res);
-	} else if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active)) {
-		io_drain_req(req);
 	} else {
 		int ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
 
-		if (unlikely(ret))
+		if (unlikely(ret)) {
 			io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
+			return;
+		}
+
+		if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active))
+			io_drain_req(req);
 		else
 			io_queue_iowq(req, NULL);
 	}
Signature · 1 line
2.39.0
author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 5 lines · On 1/29/23 6:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

This should do it.

Looks like Sasha beat me to it :)

thanks for the backport!

greg k-h

maintainer
#3 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 7 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 5 lines · On 1/29/23 6:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

This should do it.

Looks like Sasha beat me to it :)

thanks for the backport!

Yep, looks like Sasha just pulled in the dependencies, which is fine with me too.

Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe