FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 0e68b5517d3767562889f1d83fdb828c26adb24f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '[email protected]' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
0e68b5517d37 ("arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock") ff7a167961d1 ("arm64: efi: Execute runtime services from a dedicated stack")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 0e68b5517d3767562889f1d83fdb828c26adb24f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:10:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock
Running a rt-kernel base on 6.2.0-rc3-rt1 on an Ampere Altra outputs the following:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/u320:0
preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
3 locks held by kworker/u320:0/9:
#0: ffff3fff8c27d128 ((wq_completion)efi_rts_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41)
#1: ffff80000861bdd0 ((work_completion)(&efi_rts_work.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41)
#2: ffffdf7e1ed3e460 (efi_rt_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101)
Preemption disabled at:
efi_virtmap_load (./arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:248)
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u320:0 Tainted: G W 6.2.0-rc3-rt1
Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server System B81.03001.0005/Mt.Jade Motherboard, BIOS 1.08.20220218 (SCP: 1.08.20220218) 2022/02/18
Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts
Call trace:
dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:158)
show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:165)
dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107 (discriminator 4))
dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114)
__might_resched (kernel/sched/core.c:10134)
rt_spin_lock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1769 (discriminator 4))
efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101)
[...]This seems to come from commit ff7a167961d1 ("arm64: efi: Execute runtime services from a dedicated stack") which adds a spinlock. This spinlock is taken through:efi_call_rts()
\-efi_call_virt()
\-efi_call_virt_pointer()
\-arch_efi_call_virt_setup()
Make 'efi_rt_lock' a raw_spinlock to avoid being preempted.
[ardb: The EFI runtime services are called with a different set of
translation tables, and are permitted to use the SIMD registers. The context switch code preserves/restores neither, and so EFI calls must be made with preemption disabled, rather than only disabling migration.]
arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h +3 -3
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ int efi_set_mapping_permissions(struct mm_struct *mm, efi_memory_desc_t *md, ({ \efi_virtmap_load (); \__efi_fpsimd_begin (); \ -spin_lock (&efi_rt_lock); \ +raw_spin_lock (&efi_rt_lock); \ })#undef arch_efi_call_virt
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@ int efi_set_mapping_permissions(struct mm_struct *mm, efi_memory_desc_t *md,#define arch_efi_call_virt_teardown () \ ({ \ - spin_unlock(&efi_rt_lock); \ + raw_spin_unlock(&efi_rt_lock); \ __efi_fpsimd_end(); \ efi_virtmap_unload(); \ }) -extern spinlock_t efi_rt_lock; +extern raw_spinlock_t efi_rt_lock;efi_status_t __efi_rt_asm_wrapper (void *,const char *, ...);#define ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK (PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +1 -1
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ asmlinkage efi_status_t efi_handle_corrupted_x18(efi_status_t s, const char *f)return s; } -DEFINE_SPINLOCK (efi_rt_lock); +DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK (efi_rt_lock); asmlinkage u64 *efi_rt_stack_top __ro_after_init;
Ard Biesheuvel
maintainerPATCH 1/1 arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock
From: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 0e68b5517d3767562889f1d83fdb828c26adb24 ]
Running a rt-kernel base on 6.2.0-rc3-rt1 on an Ampere Altra outputs the following:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/u320:0
preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
3 locks held by kworker/u320:0/9:
#0: ffff3fff8c27d128 ((wq_completion)efi_rts_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41)
#1: ffff80000861bdd0 ((work_completion)(&efi_rts_work.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41)
#2: ffffdf7e1ed3e460 (efi_rt_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101)
Preemption disabled at:
efi_virtmap_load (./arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:248)
CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u320:0 Tainted: G W 6.2.0-rc3-rt1
Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server System B81.03001.0005/Mt.Jade Motherboard, BIOS 1.08.20220218 (SCP: 1.08.20220218) 2022/02/18
Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts
Call trace:
dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:158)
show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:165)
dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107 (discriminator 4))
dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114)
__might_resched (kernel/sched/core.c:10134)
rt_spin_lock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1769 (discriminator 4))
efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101)
[...]This seems to come from commit ff7a167961d1 ("arm64: efi: Execute runtime services from a dedicated stack") which adds a spinlock. This spinlock is taken through:efi_call_rts()
\-efi_call_virt()
\-efi_call_virt_pointer()
\-arch_efi_call_virt_setup()
Make 'efi_rt_lock' a raw_spinlock to avoid being preempted.
[ardb: The EFI runtime services are called with a different set of
translation tables, and are permitted to use the SIMD registers. The context switch code preserves/restores neither, and so EFI calls must be made with preemption disabled, rather than only disabling migration.]
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h | 6 +++--- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h +3 -3
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int efi_set_mapping_permissions(struct mm_struct *mm, efi_memory_desc_t *md); ({ \efi_virtmap_load (); \__efi_fpsimd_begin (); \ -spin_lock (&efi_rt_lock); \ +raw_spin_lock (&efi_rt_lock); \ })#undef arch_efi_call_virt
@@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ int efi_set_mapping_permissions(struct mm_struct *mm, efi_memory_desc_t *md);#define arch_efi_call_virt_teardown () \ ({ \ - spin_unlock(&efi_rt_lock); \ + raw_spin_unlock(&efi_rt_lock); \ __efi_fpsimd_end(); \ efi_virtmap_unload(); \ }) -extern spinlock_t efi_rt_lock; +extern raw_spinlock_t efi_rt_lock;extern u64 *efi_rt_stack_top;efi_status_t __efi_rt_asm_wrapper (void *,const char *, ...);
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +1 -1
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ asmlinkage efi_status_t efi_handle_corrupted_x18(efi_status_t s, const char *f)return s; } -DEFINE_SPINLOCK (efi_rt_lock); +DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK (efi_rt_lock); asmlinkage u64 *efi_rt_stack_top __ro_after_init;
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH 6.1.y] arm64: efi: Make efi_rt_lock a raw_spinlock
Quoted 45 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
From: Pierre Gondois <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit
0e68b5517d3767562889f1d83fdb828c26adb24]Running a rt-kernel base on 6.2.0-rc3-rt1 on an Ampere Altra outputs the following:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/u320:0 preempt_count: 2, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 3 locks held by kworker/u320:0/9: #0: ffff3fff8c27d128 ((wq_completion)efi_rts_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41) #1: ffff80000861bdd0 ((work_completion)(&efi_rts_work.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (./include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41) #2: ffffdf7e1ed3e460 (efi_rt_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101) Preemption disabled at: efi_virtmap_load (./arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:248) CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u320:0 Tainted: G W 6.2.0-rc3-rt1 Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server System B81.03001.0005/Mt.Jade Motherboard, BIOS 1.08.20220218 (SCP: 1.08.20220218) 2022/02/18 Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts Call trace: dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:158) show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:165) dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107 (discriminator 4)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114) __might_resched (kernel/sched/core.c:10134) rt_spin_lock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1769 (discriminator 4)) efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:101) [...]This seems to come from commit
ff7a167961d1("arm64: efi: Execute runtime services from a dedicated stack") which adds a spinlock. This spinlock is taken through:efi_call_rts()
\-efi_call_virt()
\-efi_call_virt_pointer()\-arch_efi_call_virt_setup()Make '
efi_rt_lock' araw_spinlockto avoid being preempted.[ardb: The EFI runtime services are called with a different set of
translation tables, and are permitted to use the SIMD registers. The context switch code preserves/restores neither, and so EFI calls must be made with preemption disabled, rather than only disabling migration.]
Quoted 4 lines
Fixes ff7a167961d1 ("arm64: efi: Execute runtime services from a dedicated stack")Signed-off-by Pierre Gondois <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # v6.1+Signed-off-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h