Bluetooth: btrtl: Ignore error return for hci_devcd_register()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 Bluetooth: btrtl: Ignore error return for hci_devcd_register()
From: Max Chou <[email protected]>
If CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP was not set, it would return -EOPNOTSUPP for hci_devcd_register().
In this commit, ignore error return for hci_devcd_register(). Otherwise Bluetooth initialization will be failed.
--- drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c +3 -7
@@ -962,13 +962,10 @@ static void btrtl_dmp_hdr(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)skb_put_data (skb, buf,strlen (buf)); } -static int btrtl_register_devcoredump_support (struct hci_dev *hdev) +static void btrtl_register_devcoredump_support (struct hci_dev *hdev) { -int err; +hci_devcd_register (hdev, btrtl_coredump, btrtl_dmp_hdr,NULL ); - err =hci_devcd_register (hdev, btrtl_coredump, btrtl_dmp_hdr,NULL ); - -return err; }void btrtl_set_driver_name (struct hci_dev *hdev,const char *driver_name)
@@ -1255,8 +1252,7 @@ int btrtl_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev, } done: -if (!err) - err =btrtl_register_devcoredump_support (hdev); +btrtl_register_devcoredump_support (hdev);return err; }
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=790472
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.73 seconds GitLint PASS 0.33 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.10 seconds BuildKernel PASS 40.12 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 45.09 seconds CheckSparse PASS 55.18 seconds CheckSmatch PASS 137.56 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 39.90 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 604.57 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 35.76 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 64.91 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 12.59 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 256.81 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 18.53 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 21.77 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 21.13 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 15.45 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 16.27 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 13.01 seconds IncrementalBuild PASS 36.47 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
Hello:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
Quoted 8 lines · On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 10:47:07 +0800 you wrote:
From: Max Chou <[email protected]>
If
CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMPwas not set, it would return-EOPNOTSUPPforhci_devcd_register().
In this commit, ignore error return forhci_devcd_register(). Otherwise Bluetooth initialization will be failed.[...]
Here is the summary with links:
- Bluetooth: btrtl: Ignore error return for hci_devcd_register()
https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/3ef20de6b2a8
You are awesome, thank you!
Signature · 2 lines
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Quoted 3 lines · On 07.10.23 03:00, [email protected] wrote:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
Hi Luiz. Many thx for picking this up. From the branch name is sounds like you plan to submit this change in the next merge window (If I misread the signs feel free to ignore this mail!). Wouldn't it be better to merge this in this cycle, as the commit afaics fixes a regression that was only introduced this cycle?
Ciao, Thorsten
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerHi,
Quoted 11 lines · Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Quoted 3 lines · On 07.10.23 03:00, [email protected] wrote:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
Hi Luiz. Many thx for picking this up. From the branch name is sounds like you plan to submit this change in the next merge window (If I misread the signs feel free to ignore this mail!). Wouldn't it be better to merge this in this cycle, as the commit afaics fixes a regression that was only introduced this cycle?
It is part of the for-net pull-request:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth.git/tag/?h=for-net-2023-10-13
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Quoted 15 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Quoted 11 lines · Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Quoted 3 lines · On 07.10.23 03:00, [email protected] wrote:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
Hi Luiz. Many thx for picking this up. From the branch name is sounds like you plan to submit this change in the next merge window (If I misread the signs feel free to ignore this mail!). Wouldn't it be better to merge this in this cycle, as the commit afaics fixes a regression that was only introduced this cycle?
Quoted 3 lines
It is part of the for-net pull-request:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth.git/tag/?h=for-net-2023-10-13
Ahh, great -- and sorry, the branch name in the "was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git" got me on the wrong track.
Ciao, Thorsten