drm/xe: Rework rebinding and allow same-vm eviction
Thomas Hellström
maintainercover drm/xe: Rework rebinding and allow same-vm eviction
We were not allowing eviction / shrinking of completely unbound local objects. Since unbinding is the UMD primary means of freeing up memory on local VM overcommit situations, fix this.
The funtionality added here also open up the possibility to evict purgeable local objects with upcoming changes.
To make this work properly, rebinding needs to be moved to the while-not-all-locked drm-exec loop, since rebinding may allocate gpu page table bos and thus cause evictions which forces us to re-run validation.
This is done in patch 5, but when writing that patch, a number couple of rebinding flaws were discovered.
1) When saving the rebinding fence we always presumed the rebinding fences were ordered. That is not true, and is fixed in patch 2, where we attach the rebind fences as kernel fences to the vm's resv.
2) In fact, TLB invalidation fences may currently not be assumed to be ordered at all. This is fixed in patch 3.
3) The combination of fixes for 1) and 2) makes the rebind of each vma wait for the TLB invalidation of the previous rebind, which is unnecessary and would incur unneeded latency. This is fixed in patch 1 where we move rebind TLB invalidation to the ring ops.
Patch 4 helps avoid fragile fence context assumptions for binds. Patch 5 helps us decide which local bos can be evicted Patch 6 allows evictions of completely unbound local bos
Thomas Hellström (7):
drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds drm/xe: Rework rebinding
drm/xe: Make TLB invalidation fences unordered drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
drm/xe: Move vma rebinding to the drm_exec locking loop drm/xe/bo: Forward the decision to evict local objects during
validation
drm/xe/bo: Allow eviction of unbound local bos
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_dma_buf.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 40 ++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 74 +++++------------ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h | 7 -- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 24 ++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 90 ++++++++++----------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 18 ++++- 20 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 1/7 drm/xe: Make TLB invalidation fences unordered
They can actually complete out-of-order, so allocate a unique fence context for each fence.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h | 7 ------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c +0 -1
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init(struct xe_gt *gt)INIT_LIST_HEAD (>->tlb_invalidation.pending_fences);spin_lock_init (>->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock);spin_lock_init (>->tlb_invalidation.lock); - gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_context =dma_fence_context_alloc (1 );INIT_DELAYED_WORK (>->tlb_invalidation.fence_tdr, xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h +0 -7
@@ -179,13 +179,6 @@ struct xe_gt {* xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout after the timeut interval is over. */ struct delayed_work fence_tdr; -/** @tlb_invalidation.fence_context: context for TLB invalidation fences */ -u64 fence_context; -/** -* @tlb_invalidation.fence_seqno: seqno to TLB invalidation fences, protected by -* tlb_invalidation.lock -*/ -u32 fence_seqno;/** @tlb_invalidation.lock: protects TLB invalidation fences */ spinlock_t lock; } tlb_invalidation;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1 -2
@@ -1135,8 +1135,7 @@ static int invalidation_fence_init(struct xe_gt *gt,spin_lock_irq (>->tlb_invalidation.lock);dma_fence_init (&ifence->base.base, &invalidation_fence_ops, >->tlb_invalidation.lock, - gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_context, - ++gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_seqno); +dma_fence_context_alloc (1 ),1 );spin_unlock_irq (>->tlb_invalidation.lock);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&ifence->base.link);
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 1/7 drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
In reply to Thomas HellströmFor each rebind we insert a GuC TLB invalidation and add a corresponding unordered TLB invalidation fence. This might add a huge number of TLB invalidation fences to wait for so rather than doing that, defer the TLB invalidation to the next ring ops for each affected exec queue. Since the TLB is invalidated on exec_queue switch, we need to invalidate once for each affected exec_queue.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 ++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++ 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +2 -0
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {const struct xe_ring_ops *ring_ops;/** @entity: DRM sched entity for this exec queue (1 to 1 relationship) */ struct drm_sched_entity *entity; +/** @tlb_flush_seqno: The seqno of the last rebind tlb flush performed */ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue */ struct xe_lrc lrc[]; };
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +3 -2
@@ -1254,11 +1254,12 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue* non-faulting LR, in particular on user-space batch buffer chaining, * it needs to be done here. */ -if ((rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) || - (!rebind &&xe_vm_has_scratch (vm) &&xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode (vm))) { +if ((!rebind &&xe_vm_has_scratch (vm) &&xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode (vm))) { ifence =kzalloc (sizeof (*ifence),GFP_KERNEL );if (!ifence)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + }else if (rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + vm->tlb_flush_seqno++; } rfence =kzalloc (sizeof (*rfence),GFP_KERNEL );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +4 -7
@@ -219,10 +219,9 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_simple(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc {u32 dw[MAX_JOB_SIZE_DW ], i =0 ;u32 ppgtt_flag =get_ppgtt_flag (job); -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt; -if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) { dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true); i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, true, dw, i);
@@ -270,7 +269,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc,struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt;struct xe_device *xe =gt_to_xe (gt);bool decode = job->q->class ==XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE ; -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm; dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true);
@@ -282,13 +280,13 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc, i =emit_aux_table_inv (gt,VE0_AUX_INV , dw, i); } -if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, true, dw, i); dw[i++] =preparser_disable (false); -if (!vm || !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (!job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) i =emit_store_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, dw, i);
@@ -317,7 +315,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job,struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt;struct xe_device *xe =gt_to_xe (gt);bool lacks_render = !(gt->info.engine_mask &XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK ); -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;u32 mask_flags =0 ; dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true);
@@ -327,7 +324,7 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job, mask_flags =PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS ;/* See __xe_pt_bind_vma() for a discussion on TLB invalidations. */ - i =emit_pipe_invalidate (mask_flags, vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb, dw, i); + i =emit_pipe_invalidate (mask_flags, job->ring_ops_flush_tlb, dw, i);/* hsdes: 1809175790 */ if (has_aux_ccs (xe))
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +11 -0
@@ -250,6 +250,17 @@ bool xe_sched_job_completed(struct xe_sched_job *job)void xe_sched_job_arm (struct xe_sched_job *job) { +struct xe_exec_queue *q = job->q; +struct xe_vm *vm = q->vm; + +if (vm && !xe_sched_job_is_migration (q) && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && + vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno) { + q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno; + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + }else if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + } +drm_sched_job_arm (&job->drm); }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +2 -0
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct xe_sched_job { } user_fence;/** @migrate_flush_flags: Additional flush flags for migration jobs */ u32 migrate_flush_flags; +/** @ring_ops_flush_tlb: The ring ops need to flush TLB before payload. */ +bool ring_ops_flush_tlb;/** @batch_addr: batch buffer address of job */ u64 batch_addr[]; };
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +5 -0
@@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ struct xe_vm {bool capture_once; } error_capture; +/** +* @tlb_flush_seqno: Required TLB flush seqno for the next exec. +* protected by the vm resv. +*/ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @batch_invalidate_tlb: Always invalidate TLB before batch start */ bool batch_invalidate_tlb;/** @xef: XE file handle for tracking this VM's drm client */
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Matthew Brost
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
Quoted 39 lines · Thomas Hellström
For each rebind we insert a GuC TLB invalidation and add a corresponding unordered TLB invalidation fence. This might add a huge number of TLB invalidation fences to wait for so rather than doing that, defer the TLB invalidation to the next ring ops for each affected exec queue. Since the TLB is invalidated on
exec_queueswitch, we need to invalidate once for each affectedexec_queue.Fixes 5387e865d90e ("drm/xe: Add TLB invalidation fence after rebinds issued from execs")Cc Matthew Brost <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # v6.8+Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 ++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++ 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +2
-0@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {const struct xe_ring_ops *ring_ops;/** @entity: DRM sched entity for this exec queue (1 to 1 relationship) */ struct drm_sched_entity *entity; +/** @tlb_flush_seqno: The seqno of the last rebind tlb flush performed */ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue */ struct xe_lrc lrc[]; };drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue · line 1257
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-2@@ -1254,11 +1254,12 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue* non-faulting LR, in particular on user-space batch buffer chaining, * it needs to be done here. */ -if ((rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) || - (!rebind &&xe_vm_has_scratch (vm) &&xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode (vm))) { +if ((!rebind &&xe_vm_has_scratch (vm) &&xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode (vm))) {
Looked why this works in fault mode, we disallow scratch page in fault mode. I thought at one point we had implementation for that [1] but it looks like it never got merged. Some to keep an eye on.
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue · line 1262
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +2
-0ifence =kzalloc (sizeof (*ifence),GFP_KERNEL );if (!ifence)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + }else if (rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + vm->tlb_flush_seqno++;
Can we unwind this if / else clause a bit?
I think batch_invalidate_tlb can only be true if !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm).
So else if 'rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)' should work. Also if batch_invalidate_tlb is we true we always issue TLB invalidate anyways and incrementing the seqno is harmles too.
Side note, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that I really do not like updating these functions (__xe_pt_bind_vma / __xe_pt_unbind_vma) as they are going away / being reworked here [2] in order to implement 1 job per IOCTL / proper error handling.
Quoted 69 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0} rfence =kzalloc (sizeof (*rfence),GFP_KERNEL );drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +4
-7@@ -219,10 +219,9 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_simple(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc {u32 dw[MAX_JOB_SIZE_DW ], i =0 ;u32 ppgtt_flag =get_ppgtt_flag (job); -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt; -if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) { dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true); i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, true, dw, i);@@ -270,7 +269,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc,struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt;struct xe_device *xe =gt_to_xe (gt);bool decode = job->q->class ==XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE ; -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm; dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true);@@ -282,13 +280,13 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc, i =emit_aux_table_inv (gt,VE0_AUX_INV , dw, i); } -if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, true, dw, i); dw[i++] =preparser_disable (false); -if (!vm || !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (!job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) i =emit_store_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, dw, i);@@ -317,7 +315,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job,struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt;struct xe_device *xe =gt_to_xe (gt);bool lacks_render = !(gt->info.engine_mask &XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK ); -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;u32 mask_flags =0 ; dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true);@@ -327,7 +324,7 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job, mask_flags =PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS ;/* See __xe_pt_bind_vma() for a discussion on TLB invalidations. */ - i =emit_pipe_invalidate (mask_flags, vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb, dw, i); + i =emit_pipe_invalidate (mask_flags, job->ring_ops_flush_tlb, dw, i);/* hsdes: 1809175790 */ if (has_aux_ccs (xe))drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +1
-0@@ -250,6 +250,17 @@ bool xe_sched_job_completed(struct xe_sched_job *job)void xe_sched_job_arm (struct xe_sched_job *job) { +struct xe_exec_queue *q = job->q;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c bool xe_sched_job_completed(struct xe_sched_job *job) · line 263
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +10
-0+struct xe_vm *vm = q->vm; + +if (vm && !xe_sched_job_is_migration (q) && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && + vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno) { + q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno; + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + }else if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + } +
Can we simplify this too?
if (vm && (vm->batch_invalidate_tlb || (vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno))) {
q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno;
job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true;
}I think this works as xe_sched_job_is_migration has emit_migration_job_gen12 which doesn't look at job->ring_ops_flush_tlb, so no need to xe_sched_job_is_migration.
Also no need to check xe_vm_in_lr_mode as we wouldn'y increment the seqno above if that true.
Lastly, harmless to increment q->tlb_flush_seqno in the case of batch_invalidate_tlb being true.
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h struct xe_sched_job { · line 43
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +0
-0drm_sched_job_arm (&job->drm); }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +2
-0@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct xe_sched_job { } user_fence;/** @migrate_flush_flags: Additional flush flags for migration jobs */ u32 migrate_flush_flags; +/** @ring_ops_flush_tlb: The ring ops need to flush TLB before payload. */ +bool ring_ops_flush_tlb;
How about JOB_FLAG_FLUSH_TLB rather than a new field? See JOB_FLAG_SUBMIT flag usage.
Matt
Quoted 22 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +0
-0/** @batch_addr: batch buffer address of job */ u64 batch_addr[]; };drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +5
-0@@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ struct xe_vm {bool capture_once; } error_capture; +/** +* @tlb_flush_seqno: Required TLB flush seqno for the next exec. +* protected by the vm resv. +*/ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @batch_invalidate_tlb: Always invalidate TLB before batch start */ bool batch_invalidate_tlb;/** @xef: XE file handle for tracking this VM's drm client */ Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
Hi, Matthew,
Thanks for reviewing, please see inline.
Quoted 74 lines · Matthew Brost
Quoted 54 lines · Thomas Hellström
For each rebind we insert a GuC TLB invalidation and add a corresponding unordered TLB invalidation fence. This might add a huge number of TLB invalidation fences to wait for so rather than doing that, defer the TLB invalidation to the next ring ops for each affected exec queue. Since the TLB is invalidated on
exec_queueswitch, we need to invalidate once for each affectedexec_queue.Fixes 5387e865d90e ("drm/xe: Add TLB invalidation fence afterrebinds issued from execs")
Cc Matthew Brost <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # v6.8+Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 ++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +0
-0@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue { const struct xe_ring_ops *ring_ops; /** @entity: DRM sched entity for this exec queue (1 to 1relationship) */
structdrm_sched_entity*entity;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +1
-0+/** @tlb_flush_seqno: The seqno of the last rebind tlb flush performed */
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +1
-0+u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue */ struct
xe_lrclrc[];
};drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1254,11 +1254,12 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile,struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queue
* non-faulting LR, in particular on user-space batch buffer chaining,
* it needs to be done here.
*/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-1- if ((rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) && !vm-Quoted 1 line
batch_invalidate_tlb) ||drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-1- (!rebind && xe_vm_has_scratch(vm) &&
xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode(vm))) {drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-0+ if ((!rebind && xe_vm_has_scratch(vm) &&Quoted 1 line
xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode(vm))) {Looked why this works in fault mode, we disallow scratch page in fault
mode. I thought at one point we had implementation for that [1] but it
looks like it never got merged. Some to keep an eye on.[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120480/
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue · line 1262
Quoted 6 lines
ifence =
kzalloc(sizeof(*ifence), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ifence)
returnERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-0+ } else if (rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) && !vm-Quoted 1 line
batch_invalidate_tlb) {drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-0+ vm->tlb_flush_seqno++;Can we unwind this if / else clause a bit?
Quoted 7 lines
I think
batch_invalidate_tlbcan only be true if
!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm).So else if 'rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)' should work. Also if
batch_invalidate_tlbis we true we always issue TLB invalidate anyways
and incrementing the seqno is harmles too.
Yes, although I don't really like making assumptions in the code what it does with a certain variable elsewhere. At some point in the future people might change that, or say "Hey, they unnecessarily increment the seqno here or forget a branch. I could add asserts about batch_invalidate_tlb, though to avoid such future mishaps.
Quoted 10 lines
Side note, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that I really do not like
updating these functions (__xe_pt_bind_vma/__xe_pt_unbind_vma) as they
are going away / being reworked here [2] in order to implement 1 job per
IOCTL / proper error handling.
Fully understandible. That's why I asked whether you thought it clashed. However I want this backported to 6.8 so I don't see any other way of doing it.
/Thomas
Quoted 166 lines
Quoted 91 lines
}
rfence =kzalloc(sizeof(*rfence), GFP_KERNEL);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-0@@ -219,10 +219,9 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_simple(struct
xe_sched_job*job, structxe_lrc*lrc
{
u32 dw[MAX_JOB_SIZE_DW], i = 0;
u32ppgtt_flag=get_ppgtt_flag(job);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-1-struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;struct
xe_gt*gt =job->q->gt;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +1
-1-if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) {dw[i++] =
preparser_disable(true); i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt(xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr(lrc), seqno, true, dw, i);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-0@@ -270,7 +269,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc, struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt; struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);bool decode =
job->q->class==XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-1-struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;
dw[i++] =preparser_disable(true);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-0@@ -282,13 +280,13 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc, i = emit_aux_table_inv(gt, VE0_AUX_INV, dw, i); }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +1
-1-if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb)i =
emit_flush_imm_ggtt(xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr(lrc), seqno, true, dw, i);
dw[i++] =preparser_disable(false);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +1
-1-if (!vm || !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (!job->ring_ops_flush_tlb)i =
emit_store_imm_ggtt(xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr(lrc), seqno, dw, i);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-0@@ -317,7 +315,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt; struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);bool
lacks_render= !(gt->info.engine_mask &XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-1-struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;u32
mask_flags= 0;
dw[i++] =preparser_disable(true);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-0@@ -327,7 +324,7 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job, mask_flags = PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS;
/* See__xe_pt_bind_vma()for a discussion on TLB invalidations. */drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +0
-1- i = emit_pipe_invalidate(mask_flags, vm && vm-Quoted 1 line
batch_invalidate_tlb, dw, i);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +1
-0+ i = emit_pipe_invalidate(mask_flags, job-Quoted 1 line
ring_ops_flush_tlb, dw, i);
/* hsdes: 1809175790 */
if (has_aux_ccs(xe))drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +0
-0@@ -250,6 +250,17 @@ bool xe_sched_job_completed(struct xe_sched_job *job)
voidxe_sched_job_arm(struct xe_sched_job *job)
{drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +4
-0+struct xe_exec_queue *q = job->q; +struct xe_vm *vm = q->vm; + + if (vm && !xe_sched_job_is_migration(q) &&!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) &&
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c bool xe_sched_job_completed(struct xe_sched_job *job) · line 263
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +7
-0+ vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno) { + q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno; + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + } else if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + } +Can we simplify this too?
if (vm && (vm->batch_invalidate_tlb || (vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno))) { q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno; job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; }I think this works as
xe_sched_job_is_migrationhasemit_migration_job_gen12which doesn't look at job-Quoted 1 line
ring_ops_flush_tlb,so no need to
xe_sched_job_is_migration.Also no need to check
xe_vm_in_lr_modeas we wouldn'y increment the seqno above if that true.Lastly, harmless to increment
q->tlb_flush_seqnoin the case ofbatch_invalidate_tlbbeing true.Quoted 15 lines
drm_sched_job_arm(&job->drm);
}drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +0
-0@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct xe_sched_job { } user_fence; /** @migrate_flush_flags: Additional flush flags formigration jobs */
u32migrate_flush_flags;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +1
-0+/** @ring_ops_flush_tlb: The ring ops need to flush TLB before payload. */
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h struct xe_sched_job { · line 43
Quoted 1 line
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +1
-0+bool ring_ops_flush_tlb;How about
JOB_FLAG_FLUSH_TLBrather than a new field? SeeJOB_FLAG_SUBMITflag usage.Matt
Quoted 26 lines
/** @batch_addr: batch buffer address of job */ u64 batch_addr[];
};drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +0
-0@@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ struct xe_vm { bool capture_once; } error_capture;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +2
-0+/** +* @tlb_flush_seqno: Required TLB flush seqno for the next exec.
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +3
-0+* protected by the vm resv. +*/ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @batch_invalidate_tlb: Always invalidate TLB before batch start */
boolbatch_invalidate_tlb;
/** @xef: XE file handle for tracking this VM's drm client */Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
Quoted 50 lines · Thomas Hellström
Hi, Matthew,
Thanks for reviewing, please see inline.
Quoted 45 lines · Matthew Brost
Quoted 44 lines · Thomas Hellström
For each rebind we insert a GuC TLB invalidation and add a corresponding unordered TLB invalidation fence. This might add a huge number of TLB invalidation fences to wait for so rather than doing that, defer the TLB invalidation to the next ring ops for each affected exec queue. Since the TLB is invalidated on
exec_queueswitch, we need to invalidate once for each affectedexec_queue.Fixes 5387e865d90e ("drm/xe: Add TLB invalidation fence afterrebinds issued from execs")
Cc: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 ++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +0
-0@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue { const struct xe_ring_ops *ring_ops; /** @entity: DRM sched entity for this exec queue (1 to1
relationship) */
structdrm_sched_entity*entity;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +1
-0+/** @tlb_flush_seqno: The seqno of the last rebind tlb flush performed */
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +1
-0+u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue */ struct
xe_lrclrc[];
};drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-1--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
Quoted 8 lines
+++
b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.cdrivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1254,11 +1254,12 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile,struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queue
* non-faulting LR, in particular on user-space batch buffer chaining,
* it needs to be done here.
*/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-1- if ((rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) && !vm-
While I remember it. When looking at your series I noticed that this line got incorrectly moved there. Looks like you used xe_vm_in_lr_mode() rather than !xe_vm_in_lr_mode()..
Thomas
Matthew Brost
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
Quoted 55 lines · Thomas Hellström
Quoted 54 lines · Thomas Hellström
Hi, Matthew,
Thanks for reviewing, please see inline.
Quoted 49 lines · Matthew Brost
Quoted 48 lines · Thomas Hellström
For each rebind we insert a GuC TLB invalidation and add a corresponding unordered TLB invalidation fence. This might add a huge number of TLB invalidation fences to wait for so rather than doing that, defer the TLB invalidation to the next ring ops for each affected exec queue. Since the TLB is invalidated on
exec_queueswitch, we need to invalidate once for each affectedexec_queue.Fixes 5387e865d90e ("drm/xe: Add TLB invalidation fence afterrebinds issued from execs")
Cc: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 ++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +0
-0@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue { const struct xe_ring_ops *ring_ops; /** @entity: DRM sched entity for this exec queue (1 to1
relationship) */
structdrm_sched_entity*entity;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +1
-0+/** @tlb_flush_seqno: The seqno of the last rebind tlb flush performed */
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +1
-0+u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue */ struct
xe_lrclrc[];
};drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1254,11 +1254,12 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile,struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queue
* non-faulting LR, in particular on user-space batch
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
Quoted 4 lines
buffer chaining,
* it needs to be done here.
*/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-1- if ((rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) && !vm-While I remember it. When looking at your series I noticed that this line got incorrectly moved there. Looks like you used
xe_vm_in_lr_mode()rather than !xe_vm_in_lr_mode()..
Thanks, indeed I did invert that logic. Will fix in my next rev which I'll rebase after this is merged.
Matt
Quoted 2 lines
Thomas
Thomas Hellström
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
In reply to Matthew BrostQuoted 12 lines · Matthew Brost
Can we simplify this too?
if (vm && (vm->batch_invalidate_tlb || (vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno))) { q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno; job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; }I think this works as
xe_sched_job_is_migrationhasemit_migration_job_gen12which doesn't look at job-
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
ring_ops_flush_tlb,so no need to
xe_sched_job_is_migration.Also no need to check
xe_vm_in_lr_modeas we wouldn'y increment the seqno above if that true.Lastly, harmless to increment
q->tlb_flush_seqnoin the case ofbatch_invalidate_tlbbeing true.
I think I can simplify it a bit. Problem is that neither the migration vm nor lr mode grabs the vm->resv at arm time so we would access the seqnos unlocked and potentially get caught by clever static analyzers.
I actually had an assert for that at one point. I should probably re- add it.
/Thomas
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 2/7 drm/xe: Rework rebinding
In reply to Thomas HellströmInstead of handling the vm's rebind fence separately, which is error prone if they are not strictly ordered, attach rebind fences as kernel fences to the vm's resv.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 31 +++---------------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 27 +++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 3 --- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +3 -28
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)struct drm_exec *exec = &vm_exec.exec;u32 i, num_syncs =0 , num_ufence =0 ;struct xe_sched_job *job; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;struct xe_vm *vm;bool write_locked, skip_retry = false;ktime_t end =0 ;
@@ -294,35 +293,11 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)* Rebind any invalidated userptr or evicted BOs in the VM, non-compute * VM mode only. */ - rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); +if (err) goto err_put_job; - } - -/* -* We store the rebind_fence in the VM so subsequent execs don't get -* scheduled before the rebinds of userptrs / evicted BOs is complete. -*/ -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence = rebind_fence; - } -if (vm->rebind_fence) { -if (test_bit (DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT , - &vm->rebind_fence->flags)) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence =NULL ; - }else { -dma_fence_get (vm->rebind_fence); - err =drm_sched_job_add_dependency (&job->drm, - vm->rebind_fence); -if (err) - goto err_put_job; - } - } -/* Wait behind munmap style rebinds */ +/* Wait behind rebinds */ if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm)) { err = drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(&job->drm, xe_vm_resv(vm),
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1 -1
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue }/* add shared fence now for pagetable delayed destroy */ -dma_resv_add_fence (xe_vm_resv (vm), fence, !rebind && +dma_resv_add_fence (xe_vm_resv (vm), fence, rebind || last_munmap_rebind ?DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL :DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +9 -18
@@ -522,7 +522,6 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w) { struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(w, struct xe_vm, preempt.rebind_work);struct drm_exec exec; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;unsigned int fence_count =0 ;LIST_HEAD (preempt_fences);ktime_t end =0 ;
@@ -568,18 +567,11 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w)if (err) goto out_unlock; - rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); +if (err) goto out_unlock; - } - -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_wait (rebind_fence, false); -dma_fence_put (rebind_fence); - } -/* Wait on munmap style VM unbinds */ +/* Wait on rebinds and munmap style VM unbinds */ wait =dma_resv_wait_timeout (xe_vm_resv (vm),DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL , false,MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT );
@@ -773,14 +765,14 @@ xe_vm_bind_vma(struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs, bool first_op, bool last_op); -struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker) +int xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker) { -struct dma_fence *fence =NULL ; +struct dma_fence *fence;struct xe_vma *vma, *next;lockdep_assert_held (&vm->lock);if (xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !rebind_worker) -return NULL ; +return 0 ;xe_vm_assert_held (vm); list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &vm->rebind_list,
@@ -788,17 +780,17 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker)xe_assert (vm->xe, vma->tile_present);list_del_init (&vma->combined_links.rebind); -dma_fence_put (fence);if (rebind_worker)trace_xe_vma_rebind_worker (vma);else trace_xe_vma_rebind_exec (vma); fence =xe_vm_bind_vma (vma,NULL ,NULL ,0 , false, false);if (IS_ERR (fence)) -return fence; +return PTR_ERR (fence); +dma_fence_put (fence); } -return fence; +return 0 ; }static void xe_vma_free (struct xe_vma *vma)
@@ -1588,7 +1580,6 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)XE_WARN_ON (vm->pt_root[id]);trace_xe_vm_free (vm); -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence);kfree (vm); }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1 -1
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int __xe_vm_userptr_needs_repin(struct xe_vm *vm);int xe_vm_userptr_check_repin (struct xe_vm *vm); -struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker); +int xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker);int xe_vm_invalidate_vma (struct xe_vma *vma);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +0 -3
@@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ struct xe_vm {*/ struct list_head rebind_list; -/** @rebind_fence: rebind fence from execbuf */ -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence; -/** * @destroy_work: worker to destroy VM, needed as a dma_fence signaling * from an irq context can be last put and the destroy needs to be able
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Rework rebinding
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Hellström
Instead of handling the vm's rebind fence separately, which is error prone if they are not strictly ordered, attach rebind fences as kernel fences to the vm's resv.
See comment from previous, do not like updates to __xe_pt_bind_vma but I guess I can live with it. Otherwise LGTM.
With that:
Quoted 188 lines
Fixes dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")Cc Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>Cc Matthew Brost <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # v6.8+Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 31 +++---------------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 27 +++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 3 --- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +3
-28@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)struct drm_exec *exec = &vm_exec.exec;u32 i, num_syncs =0 , num_ufence =0 ;struct xe_sched_job *job; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;struct xe_vm *vm;bool write_locked, skip_retry = false;ktime_t end =0 ;@@ -294,35 +293,11 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)* Rebind any invalidated userptr or evicted BOs in the VM, non-compute * VM mode only. */ - rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); +if (err) goto err_put_job; - } - -/* -* We store the rebind_fence in the VM so subsequent execs don't get -* scheduled before the rebinds of userptrs / evicted BOs is complete. -*/ -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence = rebind_fence; - } -if (vm->rebind_fence) { -if (test_bit (DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT , - &vm->rebind_fence->flags)) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence =NULL ; - }else { -dma_fence_get (vm->rebind_fence); - err =drm_sched_job_add_dependency (&job->drm, - vm->rebind_fence); -if (err) - goto err_put_job; - } - } -/* Wait behind munmap style rebinds */ +/* Wait behind rebinds */ if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm)) { err = drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(&job->drm, xe_vm_resv(vm),drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-1@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue }/* add shared fence now for pagetable delayed destroy */ -dma_resv_add_fence (xe_vm_resv (vm), fence, !rebind && +dma_resv_add_fence (xe_vm_resv (vm), fence, rebind || last_munmap_rebind ?DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL :DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP );drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +9
-18@@ -522,7 +522,6 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w) { struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(w, struct xe_vm, preempt.rebind_work);struct drm_exec exec; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;unsigned int fence_count =0 ;LIST_HEAD (preempt_fences);ktime_t end =0 ;@@ -568,18 +567,11 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w)if (err) goto out_unlock; - rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); +if (err) goto out_unlock; - } - -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_wait (rebind_fence, false); -dma_fence_put (rebind_fence); - } -/* Wait on munmap style VM unbinds */ +/* Wait on rebinds and munmap style VM unbinds */ wait =dma_resv_wait_timeout (xe_vm_resv (vm),DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL , false,MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT );@@ -773,14 +765,14 @@ xe_vm_bind_vma(struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs, bool first_op, bool last_op); -struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker) +int xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker) { -struct dma_fence *fence =NULL ; +struct dma_fence *fence;struct xe_vma *vma, *next;lockdep_assert_held (&vm->lock);if (xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !rebind_worker) -return NULL ; +return 0 ;xe_vm_assert_held (vm); list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &vm->rebind_list,@@ -788,17 +780,17 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker)xe_assert (vm->xe, vma->tile_present);list_del_init (&vma->combined_links.rebind); -dma_fence_put (fence);if (rebind_worker)trace_xe_vma_rebind_worker (vma);else trace_xe_vma_rebind_exec (vma); fence =xe_vm_bind_vma (vma,NULL ,NULL ,0 , false, false);if (IS_ERR (fence)) -return fence; +return PTR_ERR (fence); +dma_fence_put (fence); } -return fence; +return 0 ; }static void xe_vma_free (struct xe_vma *vma)@@ -1588,7 +1580,6 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)XE_WARN_ON (vm->pt_root[id]);trace_xe_vm_free (vm); -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence);kfree (vm); }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1
-1@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int __xe_vm_userptr_needs_repin(struct xe_vm *vm);int xe_vm_userptr_check_repin (struct xe_vm *vm); -struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker); +int xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker);int xe_vm_invalidate_vma (struct xe_vma *vma);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +0
-3@@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ struct xe_vm {*/ struct list_head rebind_list; -/** @rebind_fence: rebind fence from execbuf */ -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence; -/** * @destroy_work: worker to destroy VM, needed as a dma_fence signaling * from an irq context can be last put and the destroy needs to be able Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerRe: [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Rework rebinding
Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Brost
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Hellström
Instead of handling the vm's rebind fence separately, which is error prone if they are not strictly ordered, attach rebind fences as kernel fences to the vm's resv.
See comment from previous, do not like updates to
__xe_pt_bind_vmabut I
guess I can live with it. Otherwise LGTM.
Thanks, yeah same reason there, unfortunately.
/Thomas
Quoted 224 lines
With that:
Reviewed-by Matthew Brost <[email protected]>Quoted 220 lines
Fixes dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for IntelGPUs")
Cc Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>Cc Matthew Brost <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # v6.8+Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 31 +++-------------------------
---drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 27 +++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 3 --- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file) struct drm_exec *exec = &vm_exec.exec; u32 i, num_syncs = 0, num_ufence = 0; struct xe_sched_job *job; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence; struct xe_vm *vm; bool write_locked, skip_retry = false;
ktime_tend = 0;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-0@@ -294,35 +293,11 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file) * Rebind any invalidated userptr or evicted BOs in theVM, non-compute
* VM mode only.
*/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +2
-3- rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); +if (err)goto
err_put_job;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-4- } - -/* -* We store the rebind_fence in the VM so subsequent execs don't get
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* scheduled before the rebinds of userptrs / evicted BOs is complete.
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-13-*/ -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence = rebind_fence; - } -if (vm->rebind_fence) { -if (test_bit (DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT , - &vm->rebind_fence->flags)) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence =NULL ; - }else { -dma_fence_get (vm->rebind_fence); - err = drm_sched_job_add_dependency(&job-Quoted 1 line
drm,
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1- vm-Quoted 1 line
rebind_fence);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-4-if (err) - goto err_put_job; - } - }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +1
-1-/* Wait behind munmap style rebinds */ +/* Wait behind rebinds */ if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)) {
err = drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(&job-Quoted 1 line
drm,
xe_vm_resv(vm),drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queue
}
/* add shared fence now for pagetable delayed destroy */drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-1- dma_resv_add_fence(xe_vm_resv(vm), fence, !rebind&&
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-0+ dma_resv_add_fence(xe_vm_resv(vm), fence, rebind||
last_munmap_rebind?DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL:
DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-1@@ -522,7 +522,6 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w) { struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(w, struct xe_vm, preempt.rebind_work); struct drm_exec exec; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence; unsigned int fence_count = 0;
LIST_HEAD(preempt_fences);
ktime_tend = 0;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -568,18 +567,11 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w) if (err) goto out_unlock;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +2
-3- rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); +if (err)goto
out_unlock;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-6- } - -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_wait (rebind_fence, false); -dma_fence_put (rebind_fence); - }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1-/* Wait on munmap style VM unbinds */ +/* Wait on rebinds and munmap style VM unbinds */ wait =
dma_resv_wait_timeout(xe_vm_resv(vm), DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -773,14 +765,14 @@ xe_vm_bind_vma(struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs, bool first_op, bool last_op);
-structdma_fence*xe_vm_rebind(structxe_vm*vm, boolrebind_worker)
+intxe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker){drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1-struct dma_fence *fence =NULL ; +struct dma_fence *fence;struct
xe_vma*vma, *next;
lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock);
if (xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)&& !rebind_worker)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1-return NULL ; +return 0 ;
xe_vm_assert_held(vm); list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next,&vm->rebind_list,drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -788,17 +780,17 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker) xe_assert(vm->xe, vma->tile_present);
list_del_init(&vma->combined_links.rebind);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-1-dma_fence_put (fence);if (
rebind_worker)trace_xe_vma_rebind_worker(vma); else
trace_xe_vma_rebind_exec(vma); fence =xe_vm_bind_vma(vma, NULL, NULL, 0, false, false);
if (IS_ERR(fence))drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +2
-1-return fence; +return PTR_ERR (fence); +dma_fence_put (fence);}
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1-return fence; +return 0 ;}
static voidxe_vma_free(struct xe_vma *vma)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -1588,7 +1580,6 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w) XE_WARN_ON(vm->pt_root[id]);
trace_xe_vm_free(vm);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-1-dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence);kfree(vm);
}drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +0
-0@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int __xe_vm_userptr_needs_repin(struct xe_vm *vm);
intxe_vm_userptr_check_repin(struct xe_vm *vm);
-structdma_fence*xe_vm_rebind(structxe_vm*vm, boolrebind_worker);
+intxe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker);
intxe_vm_invalidate_vma(struct xe_vma *vma);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +0
-0@@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ struct xe_vm {*/ struct list_head rebind_list;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +0
-3-/** @rebind_fence: rebind fence from execbuf */ -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence; -/**
* @destroy_work: worker to destroy VM, needed as adma_fencesignaling
* from an irq context can be last put and the destroy needs to be ableSignature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 2/7 drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
In reply to Thomas HellströmFor each rebind we insert a GuC TLB invalidation and add a corresponding unordered TLB invalidation fence. This might add a huge number of TLB invalidation fences to wait for so rather than doing that, defer the TLB invalidation to the next ring ops for each affected exec queue. Since the TLB is invalidated on exec_queue switch, we need to invalidate once for each affected exec_queue.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 11 ++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 5 +++++ 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h +2 -0
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {const struct xe_ring_ops *ring_ops;/** @entity: DRM sched entity for this exec queue (1 to 1 relationship) */ struct drm_sched_entity *entity; +/** @tlb_flush_seqno: The seqno of the last rebind tlb flush performed */ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue */ struct xe_lrc lrc[]; };
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +3 -2
@@ -1253,11 +1253,12 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue* non-faulting LR, in particular on user-space batch buffer chaining, * it needs to be done here. */ -if ((rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) || - (!rebind &&xe_vm_has_scratch (vm) &&xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode (vm))) { +if ((!rebind &&xe_vm_has_scratch (vm) &&xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode (vm))) { ifence =kzalloc (sizeof (*ifence),GFP_KERNEL );if (!ifence)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + }else if (rebind && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + vm->tlb_flush_seqno++; } rfence =kzalloc (sizeof (*rfence),GFP_KERNEL );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c +4 -7
@@ -219,10 +219,9 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_simple(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc {u32 dw[MAX_JOB_SIZE_DW ], i =0 ;u32 ppgtt_flag =get_ppgtt_flag (job); -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt; -if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) { dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true); i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, true, dw, i);
@@ -270,7 +269,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc,struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt;struct xe_device *xe =gt_to_xe (gt);bool decode = job->q->class ==XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE ; -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm; dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true);
@@ -282,13 +280,13 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_video(struct xe_sched_job *job, struct xe_lrc *lrc, i =emit_aux_table_inv (gt,VE0_AUX_INV , dw, i); } -if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) i =emit_flush_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, true, dw, i); dw[i++] =preparser_disable (false); -if (!vm || !vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) +if (!job->ring_ops_flush_tlb) i =emit_store_imm_ggtt (xe_lrc_start_seqno_ggtt_addr (lrc), seqno, dw, i);
@@ -317,7 +315,6 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job,struct xe_gt *gt = job->q->gt;struct xe_device *xe =gt_to_xe (gt);bool lacks_render = !(gt->info.engine_mask &XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK ); -struct xe_vm *vm = job->q->vm;u32 mask_flags =0 ; dw[i++] =preparser_disable (true);
@@ -327,7 +324,7 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job, mask_flags =PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS ;/* See __xe_pt_bind_vma() for a discussion on TLB invalidations. */ - i =emit_pipe_invalidate (mask_flags, vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb, dw, i); + i =emit_pipe_invalidate (mask_flags, job->ring_ops_flush_tlb, dw, i);/* hsdes: 1809175790 */ if (has_aux_ccs (xe))
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job.c +11 -0
@@ -250,6 +250,17 @@ bool xe_sched_job_completed(struct xe_sched_job *job)void xe_sched_job_arm (struct xe_sched_job *job) { +struct xe_exec_queue *q = job->q; +struct xe_vm *vm = q->vm; + +if (vm && !xe_sched_job_is_migration (q) && !xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && + vm->tlb_flush_seqno != q->tlb_flush_seqno) { + q->tlb_flush_seqno = vm->tlb_flush_seqno; + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + }else if (vm && vm->batch_invalidate_tlb) { + job->ring_ops_flush_tlb = true; + } +drm_sched_job_arm (&job->drm); }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sched_job_types.h +2 -0
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct xe_sched_job { } user_fence;/** @migrate_flush_flags: Additional flush flags for migration jobs */ u32 migrate_flush_flags; +/** @ring_ops_flush_tlb: The ring ops need to flush TLB before payload. */ +bool ring_ops_flush_tlb;/** @batch_addr: batch buffer address of job */ u64 batch_addr[]; };
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +5 -0
@@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ struct xe_vm {bool capture_once; } error_capture; +/** +* @tlb_flush_seqno: Required TLB flush seqno for the next exec. +* protected by the vm resv. +*/ +u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @batch_invalidate_tlb: Always invalidate TLB before batch start */ bool batch_invalidate_tlb;/** @xef: XE file handle for tracking this VM's drm client */
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 3/7 drm/xe: Make TLB invalidation fences unordered
In reply to Thomas HellströmThey can actually complete out-of-order, so allocate a unique fence context for each fence.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h | 7 ------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c +0 -1
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init(struct xe_gt *gt)INIT_LIST_HEAD (>->tlb_invalidation.pending_fences);spin_lock_init (>->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock);spin_lock_init (>->tlb_invalidation.lock); - gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_context =dma_fence_context_alloc (1 );INIT_DELAYED_WORK (>->tlb_invalidation.fence_tdr, xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h +0 -7
@@ -179,13 +179,6 @@ struct xe_gt {* xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout after the timeut interval is over. */ struct delayed_work fence_tdr; -/** @tlb_invalidation.fence_context: context for TLB invalidation fences */ -u64 fence_context; -/** -* @tlb_invalidation.fence_seqno: seqno to TLB invalidation fences, protected by -* tlb_invalidation.lock -*/ -u32 fence_seqno;/** @tlb_invalidation.lock: protects TLB invalidation fences */ spinlock_t lock; } tlb_invalidation;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1 -2
@@ -1135,8 +1135,7 @@ static int invalidation_fence_init(struct xe_gt *gt,spin_lock_irq (>->tlb_invalidation.lock);dma_fence_init (&ifence->base.base, &invalidation_fence_ops, >->tlb_invalidation.lock, - gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_context, - ++gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_seqno); +dma_fence_context_alloc (1 ),1 );spin_unlock_irq (>->tlb_invalidation.lock);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&ifence->base.link);
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Make TLB invalidation fences unordered
Quoted 3 lines · Thomas Hellström
They can actually complete out-of-order, so allocate a unique fence context for each fence.
Yes indeed these can complete out ordered on different xe_exec_queue but should be ordered within an xe_exec_queue.
In addition to this patch I think we will need [1] too.
This patch does LGTM though, with that:
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/582006/?series=125608&rev=5
Quoted 57 lines
Fixes 5387e865d90e ("drm/xe: Add TLB invalidation fence after rebinds issued from execs")Cc Matthew Brost <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # v6.8+Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h | 7 ------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c +0
-1@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init(struct xe_gt *gt)INIT_LIST_HEAD (>->tlb_invalidation.pending_fences);spin_lock_init (>->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock);spin_lock_init (>->tlb_invalidation.lock); - gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_context =dma_fence_context_alloc (1 );INIT_DELAYED_WORK (>->tlb_invalidation.fence_tdr, xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h +0
-7@@ -179,13 +179,6 @@ struct xe_gt {* xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout after the timeut interval is over. */ struct delayed_work fence_tdr; -/** @tlb_invalidation.fence_context: context for TLB invalidation fences */ -u64 fence_context; -/** -* @tlb_invalidation.fence_seqno: seqno to TLB invalidation fences, protected by -* tlb_invalidation.lock -*/ -u32 fence_seqno;/** @tlb_invalidation.lock: protects TLB invalidation fences */ spinlock_t lock; } tlb_invalidation;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-2@@ -1135,8 +1135,7 @@ static int invalidation_fence_init(struct xe_gt *gt,spin_lock_irq (>->tlb_invalidation.lock);dma_fence_init (&ifence->base.base, &invalidation_fence_ops, >->tlb_invalidation.lock, - gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_context, - ++gt->tlb_invalidation.fence_seqno); +dma_fence_context_alloc (1 ),1 );spin_unlock_irq (>->tlb_invalidation.lock);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&ifence->base.link);Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 3/7 drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
In reply to Thomas HellströmReserve fence slots where actually needed rather than trying to predict how many fence slots will be needed over a complete wound-wait transaction.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 27 +--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 14 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 48 +++++++++++++--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 3 +- 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +1 -26
@@ -96,41 +96,16 @@static int xe_exec_fn (struct drm_gpuvm_exec *vm_exec) { - struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(vm_exec->vm, struct xe_vm, gpuvm);struct drm_gem_object *obj;unsigned long index; -int num_fences;int ret; ret =drm_gpuvm_validate (vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec);if (ret)return ret; -/* -* 1 fence slot for the final submit, and 1 more for every per-tile for -* GPU bind and 1 extra for CPU bind. Note that there are potentially -* many vma per object/dma-resv, however the fence slot will just be -* re-used, since they are largely the same timeline and the seqno -* should be in order. In the case of CPU bind there is dummy fence used -* for all CPU binds, so no need to have a per-tile slot for that. -*/ - num_fences =1 +1 + vm->xe->info.tile_count; - -/* -* We don't know upfront exactly how many fence slots we will need at -* the start of the exec, since the TTM bo_validate above can consume -* numerous fence slots. Also due to how the dma_resv_reserve_fences() -* works it only ensures that at least that many fence slots are -* available i.e if there are already 10 slots available and we reserve -* two more, it can just noop without reserving anything. With this it -* is quite possible that TTM steals some of the fence slots and then -* when it comes time to do the vma binding and final exec stage we are -* lacking enough fence slots, leading to some nasty BUG_ON() when -* adding the fences. Hence just add our own fences here, after the -* validate stage. -*/ drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (&vm_exec->exec, index, obj) { - ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv, num_fences); + ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv,1 );if (ret)return ret; }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c +1 -2
@@ -100,10 +100,9 @@ static int xe_pf_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vma *vma, {struct xe_bo *bo =xe_vma_bo (vma);struct xe_vm *vm =xe_vma_vm (vma); -unsigned int num_shared =2 ;/* slots for bind + move */ int err; - err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (exec, vma, num_shared); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (exec, vma);if (err)return err;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +14 -0
@@ -1235,6 +1235,13 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue err =xe_pt_prepare_bind (tile, vma, entries, &num_entries);if (err) goto err; + + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vma_bo (vma)->ttm.base.resv,1 ); +if (err) + goto err; +xe_tile_assert (tile, num_entries <=ARRAY_SIZE (entries));xe_vm_dbg_print_entries (tile_to_xe (tile), entries, num_entries);
@@ -1576,6 +1583,7 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queustruct dma_fence *fence =NULL ;struct invalidation_fence *ifence;struct xe_range_fence *rfence; +int err;LLIST_HEAD (deferred);
@@ -1593,6 +1601,12 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queuxe_pt_calc_rfence_interval (vma, &unbind_pt_update, entries, num_entries); + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vma_bo (vma)->ttm.base.resv,1 ); +if (err) +return ERR_PTR (err); + ifence =kzalloc (sizeof (*ifence),GFP_KERNEL );if (!ifence)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +23 -25
100 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1 -2
@@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ bool xe_vm_validate_should_retry(struct drm_exec *exec, int err, ktime_t *end);int xe_analyze_vm (struct drm_printer *p,struct xe_vm *vm,int gt_id); -int xe_vm_prepare_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma, -unsigned int num_shared); +int xe_vm_lock_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma);/** * xe_vm_resv() - Return's the vm's reservation object
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Matthew Brost
maintainerRe: [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Hellström
Reserve fence slots where actually needed rather than trying to predict how many fence slots will be needed over a complete wound-wait transaction.
You include this patch twice in the series.
Quoted 79 lines
Fixes 29f424eb8702 ("drm/xe/exec: move fence reservation")Cc Matthew Auld <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 27 +--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 14 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 48 +++++++++++++--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 3 +- 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +1
-26@@ -96,41 +96,16 @@static int xe_exec_fn (struct drm_gpuvm_exec *vm_exec) { - struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(vm_exec->vm, struct xe_vm, gpuvm);struct drm_gem_object *obj;unsigned long index; -int num_fences;int ret; ret =drm_gpuvm_validate (vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec);if (ret)return ret; -/* -* 1 fence slot for the final submit, and 1 more for every per-tile for -* GPU bind and 1 extra for CPU bind. Note that there are potentially -* many vma per object/dma-resv, however the fence slot will just be -* re-used, since they are largely the same timeline and the seqno -* should be in order. In the case of CPU bind there is dummy fence used -* for all CPU binds, so no need to have a per-tile slot for that. -*/ - num_fences =1 +1 + vm->xe->info.tile_count; - -/* -* We don't know upfront exactly how many fence slots we will need at -* the start of the exec, since the TTM bo_validate above can consume -* numerous fence slots. Also due to how the dma_resv_reserve_fences() -* works it only ensures that at least that many fence slots are -* available i.e if there are already 10 slots available and we reserve -* two more, it can just noop without reserving anything. With this it -* is quite possible that TTM steals some of the fence slots and then -* when it comes time to do the vma binding and final exec stage we are -* lacking enough fence slots, leading to some nasty BUG_ON() when -* adding the fences. Hence just add our own fences here, after the -* validate stage. -*/ drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (&vm_exec->exec, index, obj) { - ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv, num_fences); + ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv,1 );if (ret)return ret; }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c +1
-2@@ -100,10 +100,9 @@ static int xe_pf_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vma *vma, {struct xe_bo *bo =xe_vma_bo (vma);struct xe_vm *vm =xe_vma_vm (vma); -unsigned int num_shared =2 ;/* slots for bind + move */ int err; - err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (exec, vma, num_shared); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (exec, vma);if (err)return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue · line 1244
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +7
-0@@ -1235,6 +1235,13 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue err =xe_pt_prepare_bind (tile, vma, entries, &num_entries);if (err) goto err; + + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vma_bo (vma)->ttm.base.resv,1 ); +if (err) + goto err; +
Again not a huge fan of updating __xe_pt_bind_vma / __xe_pt_unbind_vma here because these are going away [1] but again conceptually this is more or less correct the place.
Quoted 47 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +7
-0xe_tile_assert (tile, num_entries <=ARRAY_SIZE (entries));xe_vm_dbg_print_entries (tile_to_xe (tile), entries, num_entries);@@ -1576,6 +1583,7 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queustruct dma_fence *fence =NULL ;struct invalidation_fence *ifence;struct xe_range_fence *rfence; +int err;LLIST_HEAD (deferred);@@ -1593,6 +1601,12 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queuxe_pt_calc_rfence_interval (vma, &unbind_pt_update, entries, num_entries); + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vma_bo (vma)->ttm.base.resv,1 ); +if (err) +return ERR_PTR (err); + ifence =kzalloc (sizeof (*ifence),GFP_KERNEL );if (!ifence)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +3
-6@@ -485,14 +485,11 @@ static int xe_gpuvm_validate(struct drm_gpuvm_bo *vm_bo, struct drm_exec *exec)static int xe_preempt_work_begin (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vm *vm,bool *done) { +struct drm_gem_object *obj; +unsigned long index;int err; -/* -* 1 fence for each preempt fence plus a fence for each tile from a -* possible rebind -*/ - err =drm_gpuvm_prepare_vm (&vm->gpuvm, exec, vm->preempt.num_exec_queues + - vm->xe->info.tile_count); + err =drm_gpuvm_prepare_vm (&vm->gpuvm, exec,0 );if (err)return err;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm, · line 507
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1@@ -507,7 +504,7 @@ static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,return 0 ; } - err =drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects (&vm->gpuvm, exec, vm->preempt.num_exec_queues); + err =drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects (&vm->gpuvm, exec,0 );
I think this needs to be 1 as drm_gpuvm_validate needs a fence slot, right?
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0if (err)return err;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm, · line 520
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +6
-1@@ -515,7 +512,17 @@ static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,if (err)return err; -return drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec); + err =drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec); +if (err) +return err; + +drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (exec, index, obj) { + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv, vm->preempt.num_exec_queues);
What if we only have external BOs? Do we allocate slots in the VM dma-resv slot with this loop?
Also what is the behavior of?
dma_resv_reserve_fences(obj, 1);dma_resv_reserve_fences(obj, 1);
Do we have 2 slots now? e.g. to calls to reserve slots accumulate?
Lastly, strickly speaking I don't we need to patch in this series, do we? It doesn't appaer to being fixing anything unless I'm missing something.
Matt
Quoted 85 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +13
-17+if (err) +return err; + } + +return 0 ; }static void preempt_rebind_work_func (struct work_struct *w)@@ -1004,35 +1011,26 @@ static void xe_vma_destroy(struct xe_vma *vma, struct dma_fence *fence) }/** -* xe_vm_prepare_vma() - drm_exec utility to lock a vma +* xe_vm_lock_vma() - drm_exec utility to lock a vma * @exec: The drm_exec object we're currently locking for. * @vma: The vma for witch we want to lock the vm resv and any attached * object's resv. -* @num_shared: The number of dma-fence slots to pre-allocate in the -* objects' reservation objects. * * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error. In particular * may return -EDEADLK on WW transaction contention and -EINTR if * an interruptible wait is terminated by a signal. */ -int xe_vm_prepare_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma, -unsigned int num_shared) +int xe_vm_lock_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma) {struct xe_vm *vm =xe_vma_vm (vma);struct xe_bo *bo =xe_vma_bo (vma);int err;XE_WARN_ON (!vm); -if (num_shared) - err =drm_exec_prepare_obj (exec,xe_vm_obj (vm), num_shared); -else - err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec,xe_vm_obj (vm)); -if (!err && bo && !bo->vm) { -if (num_shared) - err =drm_exec_prepare_obj (exec, &bo->ttm.base, num_shared); -else - err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec, &bo->ttm.base); - } + + err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec,xe_vm_obj (vm)); +if (!err && bo && !bo->vm) + err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec, &bo->ttm.base);return err; }@@ -1044,7 +1042,7 @@ static void xe_vma_destroy_unlocked(struct xe_vma *vma)drm_exec_init (&exec,0 ,0 ); drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) { - err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (&exec, vma,0 ); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (&exec, vma);drm_exec_retry_on_contention (&exec);if (XE_WARN_ON (err))break ;@@ -2511,7 +2509,7 @@ static int op_execute(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,lockdep_assert_held_write (&vm->lock); - err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (exec, vma,1 ); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (exec, vma);if (err)return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1
-2@@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ bool xe_vm_validate_should_retry(struct drm_exec *exec, int err, ktime_t *end);int xe_analyze_vm (struct drm_printer *p,struct xe_vm *vm,int gt_id); -int xe_vm_prepare_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma, -unsigned int num_shared); +int xe_vm_lock_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma);/** * xe_vm_resv() - Return's the vm's reservation object Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerRe: [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
Quoted 7 lines · Matthew Brost
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Hellström
Reserve fence slots where actually needed rather than trying to predict how many fence slots will be needed over a complete wound-wait transaction.
You include this patch twice in the series.
Yes, the whole series got mixed up due to me forgetting to remove the old series before sending patches out.
Please don't bother continue reviewing until v2 is out!
Some answers below.
Quoted 187 lines
Quoted 114 lines
Fixes 29f424eb8702 ("drm/xe/exec: move fence reservation")Cc Matthew Auld <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 27 +---------------drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c| 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 14 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 48 +++++++++++++-----------
----
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 3 +-5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-0@@ -96,41 +96,16 @@
static intxe_exec_fn(struct drm_gpuvm_exec *vm_exec){drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1- struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(vm_exec->vm, struct xe_vm,gpuvm);
structdrm_gem_object*obj;
unsigned long index;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-int num_fences;int ret;
ret =drm_gpuvm_validate(vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec); if (ret)
return ret;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-2-/* -* 1 fence slot for the final submit, and 1 more for every per-tile for
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* GPU bind and 1 extra for CPU bind. Note that there are potentially
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* many vma per object/dma-resv, however the fence slot will just be
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* re-used, since they are largely the same timeline and the seqno
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* should be in order. In the case of CPU bind there is dummy fence used
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* for all CPU binds, so no need to have a per-tile slot for that.
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-5-*/ - num_fences =1 +1 + vm->xe->info.tile_count; - -/* -* We don't know upfront exactly how many fence slots we will need at
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* the start of the exec, since the TTM bo_validate above can consume
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* numerous fence slots. Also due to how the
dma_resv_reserve_fences()drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* works it only ensures that at least that many fence slots are
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* available i.e if there are already 10 slots available and we reserve
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* two more, it can just noop without reserving anything. With this it
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* is quite possible that TTM steals some of the fence slots and then
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* when it comes time to do the vma binding and final exec stage we are
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* lacking enough fence slots, leading to some nasty
BUG_ON()whendrivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1-* adding the fences. Hence just add our own fences here, after the
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-2-* validate stage. -*/
drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(&vm_exec->exec, index, obj){drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +0
-1- ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(obj->resv,
num_fences);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +1
-0+ ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv,1 );if (ret)
return ret;
}drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c +0
-1@@ -100,10 +100,9 @@ static int xe_pf_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vma *vma, { struct xe_bo *bo = xe_vma_bo(vma); struct xe_vm *vm = xe_vma_vm(vma); -unsigned int num_shared =2 ;/* slots for bind + move */ int err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c +1
-1- err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (exec, vma, num_shared); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (exec, vma);if (err)
return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1235,6 +1235,13 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile,struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queue
err =xe_pt_prepare_bind(tile, vma, entries, &num_entries);
if (err)
goto err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +4
-0+ + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err = dma_resv_reserve_fences(xe_vma_bo(vma)-Quoted 1 line
ttm.base.resv, 1);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue · line 1244
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +3
-0+if (err) + goto err; +Again not a huge fan of updating
__xe_pt_bind_vma/__xe_pt_unbind_vma
here because these are going away [1] but again conceptually this is more or less correct the place.Quoted 62 lines
xe_tile_assert(tile, num_entries <= ARRAY_SIZE(entries));
xe_vm_dbg_print_entries(tile_to_xe(tile), entries, num_entries);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1576,6 +1583,7 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile,struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queu
structdma_fence*fence = NULL;
structinvalidation_fence*ifence;
structxe_range_fence*rfence;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1
-0+int err;
LLIST_HEAD(deferred);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +0
-0@@ -1593,6 +1601,12 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile,struct
xe_vma*vma, structxe_exec_queuxe_pt_calc_rfence_interval(vma,&unbind_pt_update, entries,
num_entries);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +3
-0+ err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err = dma_resv_reserve_fences(xe_vma_bo(vma)-Quoted 1 line
ttm.base.resv, 1);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +3
-0+if (err) +return ERR_PTR (err); +ifence =
kzalloc(sizeof(*ifence), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ifence)
returnERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -485,14 +485,11 @@ static int xe_gpuvm_validate(struct drm_gpuvm_bo *vm_bo, struct drm_exec *exec)static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct
drm_exec*exec, structxe_vm*vm,
bool *done)
{drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +2
-0+struct drm_gem_object *obj; +unsigned long index;int err;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-2-/* -* 1 fence for each preempt fence plus a fence for each tile from a
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-3-* possible rebind -*/ - err = drm_gpuvm_prepare_vm(&vm->gpuvm, exec, vm-Quoted 1 line
preempt.num_exec_queues +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1- vm->xe->info.tile_count); + err =drm_gpuvm_prepare_vm (&vm->gpuvm, exec,0 );if (err)
return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -507,7 +504,7 @@ static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm, return 0; }drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-1- err = drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects(&vm->gpuvm, exec, vm-
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm, · line 507
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
preempt.num_exec_queues);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-0+ err =drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects (&vm->gpuvm, exec,0 );I think this needs to be 1 as
drm_gpuvm_validateneeds a fence slot, right?
You mean for the bo move? It should be allocated by TTM on demand.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
if (err)
return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -515,7 +512,17 @@ static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm, if (err) return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +6
-1-return drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec); + err =drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec); +if (err) +return err; + +drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (exec, index, obj) { + err = dma_resv_reserve_fences(obj->resv, vm-
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
preempt.num_exec_queues);
What if we only have external BOs? Do we allocate slots in the VM dma-resv slot with this loop?
Yes we do.
Quoted 7 lines
Also what is the behavior of?
dma_resv_reserve_fences(obj, 1);dma_resv_reserve_fences(obj, 1);Do we have 2 slots now? e.g. to calls to reserve slots accumulate?
Nope, there is only guaranteed to be 1. (There have been several attempts to change those semantics, but I don't know what happened to those TBH). I think we need to follow the principle
"Anything that attaches a fence needs to reserve it, and no recursion to be future-proof".
Quoted 4 lines
Lastly, strickly speaking I don't we need to patch in this series, do we? It doesn't appaer to being fixing anything unless I'm missing something.
It's actually the removed comment:
" ...however the fence slot will just be
* re-used, since they are largely the same timeline and the seqno
* should be in order. In the case of CPU bind there is dummy fence used..."
That made me scared. With the change of invalidation fences, that is not true anymore, and with multiple tiles we now do the right thing with this patch AFAICT.
/Thomas
Quoted 100 lines
Matt
Quoted 97 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +5
-0+if (err) +return err; + } + +return 0 ;}
static voidpreempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w)drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -1004,35 +1011,26 @@ static void xe_vma_destroy(struct xe_vma *vma, struct dma_fence *fence) }
/**
- *xe_vm_prepare_vma()-drm_executility to lock a vma
+ *xe_vm_lock_vma()-drm_executility to lock a vma
* @exec: Thedrm_execobject we're currently locking for.
* @vma: The vma for witch we want to lock the vm resv and any attached
* object's resv.
- * @num_shared: The number of dma-fence slots to pre-allocate in the
- * objects' reservation objects.
*
* Return: 0 on success, negative error code on error. In particular
* may return-EDEADLKon WW transaction contention and-EINTRif
* an interruptible wait is terminated by a signal.
*/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-2-int xe_vm_prepare_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma, - unsigned int num_shared) +int xe_vm_lock_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma){
structxe_vm*vm =xe_vma_vm(vma);
structxe_bo*bo =xe_vma_bo(vma);
int err;
XE_WARN_ON(!vm);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-2-if (num_shared) - err = drm_exec_prepare_obj(exec, xe_vm_obj(vm),
num_shared);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-5-else - err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec,xe_vm_obj (vm)); -if (!err && bo && !bo->vm) { -if (num_shared) - err = drm_exec_prepare_obj(exec, &bo-Quoted 1 line
ttm.base,
num_shared);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-2-else - err = drm_exec_lock_obj(exec, &bo-Quoted 1 line
ttm.base);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +4
-1- } + + err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec,xe_vm_obj (vm)); +if (!err && bo && !bo->vm) + err =drm_exec_lock_obj (exec, &bo->ttm.base);
return err;
}drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -1044,7 +1042,7 @@ static void xe_vma_destroy_unlocked(struct xe_vma *vma)
drm_exec_init(&exec, 0, 0);
drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec){drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1- err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (&exec, vma,0 ); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (&exec, vma);
drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec); if (XE_WARN_ON(err))
break;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +0
-0@@ -2511,7 +2509,7 @@ static int op_execute(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,
lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +1
-1- err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (exec, vma,1 ); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (exec, vma);if (err)
return err;drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +0
-0@@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ bool xe_vm_validate_should_retry(struct drm_exec *exec, int err, ktime_t *end);
intxe_analyze_vm(struct drm_printer *p, struct xe_vm *vm, int gt_id);drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1
-2-int xe_vm_prepare_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma, - unsigned int num_shared); +int xe_vm_lock_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma);
/**
*xe_vm_resv()- Return's the vm's reservation objectSignature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 4/7 drm/xe: Rework rebinding
In reply to Thomas HellströmInstead of handling the vm's rebind fence separately, which is error prone if they are not strictly ordered, attach rebind fences as kernel fences to the vm's resv.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 31 +++---------------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 27 +++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 3 --- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +3 -28
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)struct drm_exec *exec = &vm_exec.exec;u32 i, num_syncs =0 , num_ufence =0 ;struct xe_sched_job *job; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;struct xe_vm *vm;bool write_locked, skip_retry = false;ktime_t end =0 ;
@@ -269,35 +268,11 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)* Rebind any invalidated userptr or evicted BOs in the VM, non-compute * VM mode only. */ - rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); +if (err) goto err_put_job; - } - -/* -* We store the rebind_fence in the VM so subsequent execs don't get -* scheduled before the rebinds of userptrs / evicted BOs is complete. -*/ -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence = rebind_fence; - } -if (vm->rebind_fence) { -if (test_bit (DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT , - &vm->rebind_fence->flags)) { -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence); - vm->rebind_fence =NULL ; - }else { -dma_fence_get (vm->rebind_fence); - err =drm_sched_job_add_dependency (&job->drm, - vm->rebind_fence); -if (err) - goto err_put_job; - } - } -/* Wait behind munmap style rebinds */ +/* Wait behind rebinds */ if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm)) { err = drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(&job->drm, xe_vm_resv(vm),
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +1 -1
@@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue }/* add shared fence now for pagetable delayed destroy */ -dma_resv_add_fence (xe_vm_resv (vm), fence, !rebind && +dma_resv_add_fence (xe_vm_resv (vm), fence, rebind || last_munmap_rebind ?DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL :DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +9 -18
@@ -529,7 +529,6 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w) { struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(w, struct xe_vm, preempt.rebind_work);struct drm_exec exec; -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;unsigned int fence_count =0 ;LIST_HEAD (preempt_fences);ktime_t end =0 ;
@@ -575,18 +574,11 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w)if (err) goto out_unlock; - rebind_fence =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); -if (IS_ERR (rebind_fence)) { - err =PTR_ERR (rebind_fence); + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); +if (err) goto out_unlock; - } - -if (rebind_fence) { -dma_fence_wait (rebind_fence, false); -dma_fence_put (rebind_fence); - } -/* Wait on munmap style VM unbinds */ +/* Wait on rebinds and munmap style VM unbinds */ wait =dma_resv_wait_timeout (xe_vm_resv (vm),DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL , false,MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT );
@@ -780,14 +772,14 @@ xe_vm_bind_vma(struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs, bool first_op, bool last_op); -struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker) +int xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker) { -struct dma_fence *fence =NULL ; +struct dma_fence *fence;struct xe_vma *vma, *next;lockdep_assert_held (&vm->lock);if (xe_vm_in_lr_mode (vm) && !rebind_worker) -return NULL ; +return 0 ;xe_vm_assert_held (vm); list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &vm->rebind_list,
@@ -795,17 +787,17 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind(struct xe_vm *vm, bool rebind_worker)xe_assert (vm->xe, vma->tile_present);list_del_init (&vma->combined_links.rebind); -dma_fence_put (fence);if (rebind_worker)trace_xe_vma_rebind_worker (vma);else trace_xe_vma_rebind_exec (vma); fence =xe_vm_bind_vma (vma,NULL ,NULL ,0 , false, false);if (IS_ERR (fence)) -return fence; +return PTR_ERR (fence); +dma_fence_put (fence); } -return fence; +return 0 ; }static void xe_vma_free (struct xe_vma *vma)
@@ -1586,7 +1578,6 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)XE_WARN_ON (vm->pt_root[id]);trace_xe_vm_free (vm); -dma_fence_put (vm->rebind_fence);kfree (vm); }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1 -1
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int __xe_vm_userptr_needs_repin(struct xe_vm *vm);int xe_vm_userptr_check_repin (struct xe_vm *vm); -struct dma_fence *xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker); +int xe_vm_rebind (struct xe_vm *vm,bool rebind_worker);int xe_vm_invalidate_vma (struct xe_vma *vma);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +0 -3
@@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ struct xe_vm {*/ struct list_head rebind_list; -/** @rebind_fence: rebind fence from execbuf */ -struct dma_fence *rebind_fence; -/** * @destroy_work: worker to destroy VM, needed as a dma_fence signaling * from an irq context can be last put and the destroy needs to be able
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 4/7 drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
In reply to Thomas HellströmReserve fence slots where actually needed rather than trying to predict how many fence slots will be needed over a complete wound-wait transaction.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 27 +--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 14 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 48 +++++++++++++--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 3 +- 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +1 -26
@@ -96,41 +96,16 @@static int xe_exec_fn (struct drm_gpuvm_exec *vm_exec) { - struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(vm_exec->vm, struct xe_vm, gpuvm);struct drm_gem_object *obj;unsigned long index; -int num_fences;int ret; ret =drm_gpuvm_validate (vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec);if (ret)return ret; -/* -* 1 fence slot for the final submit, and 1 more for every per-tile for -* GPU bind and 1 extra for CPU bind. Note that there are potentially -* many vma per object/dma-resv, however the fence slot will just be -* re-used, since they are largely the same timeline and the seqno -* should be in order. In the case of CPU bind there is dummy fence used -* for all CPU binds, so no need to have a per-tile slot for that. -*/ - num_fences =1 +1 + vm->xe->info.tile_count; - -/* -* We don't know upfront exactly how many fence slots we will need at -* the start of the exec, since the TTM bo_validate above can consume -* numerous fence slots. Also due to how the dma_resv_reserve_fences() -* works it only ensures that at least that many fence slots are -* available i.e if there are already 10 slots available and we reserve -* two more, it can just noop without reserving anything. With this it -* is quite possible that TTM steals some of the fence slots and then -* when it comes time to do the vma binding and final exec stage we are -* lacking enough fence slots, leading to some nasty BUG_ON() when -* adding the fences. Hence just add our own fences here, after the -* validate stage. -*/ drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (&vm_exec->exec, index, obj) { - ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv, num_fences); + ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv,1 );if (ret)return ret; }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c +1 -2
@@ -100,10 +100,9 @@ static int xe_pf_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vma *vma, {struct xe_bo *bo =xe_vma_bo (vma);struct xe_vm *vm =xe_vma_vm (vma); -unsigned int num_shared =2 ;/* slots for bind + move */ int err; - err =xe_vm_prepare_vma (exec, vma, num_shared); + err =xe_vm_lock_vma (exec, vma);if (err)return err;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c +14 -0
@@ -1235,6 +1235,13 @@ __xe_pt_bind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queue err =xe_pt_prepare_bind (tile, vma, entries, &num_entries);if (err) goto err; + + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vma_bo (vma)->ttm.base.resv,1 ); +if (err) + goto err; +xe_tile_assert (tile, num_entries <=ARRAY_SIZE (entries));xe_vm_dbg_print_entries (tile_to_xe (tile), entries, num_entries);
@@ -1576,6 +1583,7 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queustruct dma_fence *fence =NULL ;struct invalidation_fence *ifence;struct xe_range_fence *rfence; +int err;LLIST_HEAD (deferred);
@@ -1593,6 +1601,12 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queuxe_pt_calc_rfence_interval (vma, &unbind_pt_update, entries, num_entries); + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vm_resv (vm),1 ); +if (!err && !xe_vma_has_no_bo (vma) && !xe_vma_bo (vma)->vm) + err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (xe_vma_bo (vma)->ttm.base.resv,1 ); +if (err) +return ERR_PTR (err); + ifence =kzalloc (sizeof (*ifence),GFP_KERNEL );if (!ifence)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +23 -25
100 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h +1 -2
@@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ bool xe_vm_validate_should_retry(struct drm_exec *exec, int err, ktime_t *end);int xe_analyze_vm (struct drm_printer *p,struct xe_vm *vm,int gt_id); -int xe_vm_prepare_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma, -unsigned int num_shared); +int xe_vm_lock_vma (struct drm_exec *exec,struct xe_vma *vma);/** * xe_vm_resv() - Return's the vm's reservation object
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 5/7 drm/xe: Move vma rebinding to the drm_exec locking loop
In reply to Thomas HellströmRebinding might allocate page-table bos, causing evictions. To support blocking locking during these evictions, perform the rebinding in the drm_exec locking loop.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 13 ++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 +++++++++--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +10 -3
@@ -96,13 +96,20 @@static int xe_exec_fn (struct drm_gpuvm_exec *vm_exec) { + struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(vm_exec->vm, struct xe_vm, gpuvm);struct drm_gem_object *obj;unsigned long index;int ret; - ret =drm_gpuvm_validate (vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec); -if (ret) -return ret; +do { + ret =drm_gpuvm_validate (vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec); +if (ret) +return ret; + + ret =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false); +if (ret) +return ret; + }while (!list_empty (&vm->gpuvm.evict.list));drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (&vm_exec->exec, index, obj) { ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv,1 );
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +9 -3
@@ -512,9 +512,15 @@ static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,if (err)return err; - err =drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec); -if (err) -return err; +do { + err =drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec); +if (err) +return err; + + err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true); +if (err) +return err; + }while (!list_empty (&vm->gpuvm.evict.list));drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (exec, index, obj) { err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv, vm->preempt.num_exec_queues);
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 6/7 drm/xe/bo: Forward the decision to evict local objects during validation
In reply to Thomas HellströmCurrently we refuse evicting the VM's local objects. However that is necessary for some objects. Most notably completely unbound objects. Forward this decision to be per-object based in the TTM eviction_valuable() callback.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c | 6 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_dma_buf.c | 4 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 11 +++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 15 +++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 10 +++++++ 12 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c +1 -1
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(struct intel_framebuffer *fb,if (IS_DGFX (xe)) ret =xe_bo_migrate (bo,XE_PL_VRAM0 );else - ret =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL , true); + ret =xe_bo_validate (bo, bo->vm);if (!ret)ttm_bo_pin (&bo->ttm);ttm_bo_unreserve (&bo->ttm);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c +3 -3
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int ccs_test_migrate(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_bo *bo,u32 offset;/* Move bo to VRAM if not already there. */ - ret =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL , false); + ret =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL );if (ret) {KUNIT_FAIL (test,"Failed to validate bo.\n" );return ret;
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int evict_test_run_tile(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_tile *tile, strucif (i) {down_read (&vm->lock);xe_vm_lock (vm, false); - err =xe_bo_validate (bo, bo->vm, false); + err =xe_bo_validate (bo, bo->vm);xe_vm_unlock (vm);up_read (&vm->lock);if (err) {
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int evict_test_run_tile(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_tile *tile, struc goto cleanup_all; }xe_bo_lock (external, false); - err =xe_bo_validate (external,NULL , false); + err =xe_bo_validate (external,NULL );xe_bo_unlock (external);if (err) { KUNIT_FAIL(test, "external bo valid err=%pe\n",
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_dma_buf.c +2 -2
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void check_residency(struct kunit *test, struct xe_bo *exported, }/* Re-validate the importer. This should move also exporter in. */ - ret =xe_bo_validate (imported,NULL , false); + ret =xe_bo_validate (imported,NULL );if (ret) {if (ret != -EINTR && ret != -ERESTARTSYS ) KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Validating importer failed with err=%d.\n",
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void xe_test_dmabuf_import_same_driver(struct xe_device *xe)/* Is everything where we expect it to be? */ xe_bo_lock (import_bo, false); - err =xe_bo_validate (import_bo,NULL , false); + err =xe_bo_validate (import_bo,NULL );/* Pinning in VRAM is not allowed. */ if (!is_dynamic(params) &&
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c +1 -1
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static void test_copy(struct xe_migrate *m, struct xe_bo *bo,return ; } - err =xe_bo_validate (remote,NULL , false); + err =xe_bo_validate (remote,NULL );if (err) {KUNIT_FAIL (test,"Failed to validate system bo for %s: %li\n" , str, err);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c +25 -11
@@ -1019,6 +1019,23 @@ static void xe_ttm_bo_delete_mem_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *ttm_bo) } } +static bool xe_bo_eviction_valuable (struct ttm_buffer_object *ttm_bo, +const struct ttm_place *place) +{ +if (xe_bo_is_xe_bo (ttm_bo)) { +struct xe_bo *xe_bo =ttm_to_xe_bo (ttm_bo); +struct xe_vm *vm = xe_bo->vm; + +if (vm && !drm_gpuvm_is_extobj (&vm->gpuvm, &ttm_bo->base) && + vm->is_validating) { +xe_vm_assert_held (vm); +return false; + } + } + +return ttm_bo_eviction_valuable (ttm_bo, place); +} +const struct ttm_device_funcs xe_ttm_funcs = { .ttm_tt_create = xe_ttm_tt_create, .ttm_tt_populate = xe_ttm_tt_populate,
@@ -1029,7 +1046,7 @@ const struct ttm_device_funcs xe_ttm_funcs = { .io_mem_reserve = xe_ttm_io_mem_reserve, .io_mem_pfn = xe_ttm_io_mem_pfn, .release_notify = xe_ttm_bo_release_notify, - .eviction_valuable = ttm_bo_eviction_valuable, + .eviction_valuable = xe_bo_eviction_valuable, .delete_mem_notify = xe_ttm_bo_delete_mem_notify, };
@@ -1631,7 +1648,7 @@ int xe_bo_pin_external(struct xe_bo *bo)xe_assert (xe,xe_bo_is_user (bo));if (!xe_bo_is_pinned (bo)) { - err =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL , false); + err =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL );if (err)return err;
@@ -1675,7 +1692,7 @@ int xe_bo_pin(struct xe_bo *bo)/* We only expect at most 1 pin */ xe_assert (xe, !xe_bo_is_pinned (bo)); - err =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL , false); + err =xe_bo_validate (bo, bo->vm);if (err)return err;
@@ -1772,19 +1789,17 @@ void xe_bo_unpin(struct xe_bo *bo)* xe_bo_validate() - Make sure the bo is in an allowed placement * @bo: The bo, * @vm: Pointer to a the vm the bo shares a locked dma_resv object with, or -* NULL. Used together with @allow_res_evict. -* @allow_res_evict: Whether it's allowed to evict bos sharing @vm's -* reservation object. +* NULL. * * Make sure the bo is in allowed placement, migrating it if necessary. If * needed, other bos will be evicted. If bos selected for eviction shares -* the @vm's reservation object, they can be evicted iff @allow_res_evict is -* set to true, otherwise they will be bypassed. +* the @vm's reservation object, they can be evicted if the +* xe_bo_eviction_valuable() function allows it. * * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure. May return * -EINTR or -ERESTARTSYS if internal waits are interrupted by a signal. */ -int xe_bo_validate (struct xe_bo *bo,struct xe_vm *vm,bool allow_res_evict) +int xe_bo_validate (struct xe_bo *bo,struct xe_vm *vm) {struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { .interruptible = true,
@@ -1792,10 +1807,9 @@ int xe_bo_validate(struct xe_bo *bo, struct xe_vm *vm, bool allow_res_evict) };if (vm) { -lockdep_assert_held (&vm->lock);xe_vm_assert_held (vm); - ctx.allow_res_evict = allow_res_evict; + ctx.allow_res_evict = true; ctx.resv =xe_vm_resv (vm); }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h +1 -1
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ int xe_bo_pin_external(struct xe_bo *bo);int xe_bo_pin (struct xe_bo *bo);void xe_bo_unpin_external (struct xe_bo *bo);void xe_bo_unpin (struct xe_bo *bo); -int xe_bo_validate (struct xe_bo *bo,struct xe_vm *vm,bool allow_res_evict); +int xe_bo_validate (struct xe_bo *bo,struct xe_vm *vm);static inline bool xe_bo_is_pinned (struct xe_bo *bo) {
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c +1 -1
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct sg_table *xe_dma_buf_map(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,if (!attach->peer2peer) r =xe_bo_migrate (bo,XE_PL_TT );else - r =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL , false); + r =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL );if (r)return ERR_PTR (r); }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c +8 -3
@@ -101,23 +101,27 @@ static int xe_exec_fn(struct drm_gpuvm_exec *vm_exec)unsigned long index;int ret; + vm->is_validating = true;do { ret =drm_gpuvm_validate (vm_exec->vm, &vm_exec->exec);if (ret) -return ret; + goto out; ret =xe_vm_rebind (vm, false);if (ret) -return ret; + goto out; }while (!list_empty (&vm->gpuvm.evict.list));drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (&vm_exec->exec, index, obj) { ret =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv,1 );if (ret) -return ret; + goto out; }return 0 ; +out: + vm->is_validating = false; +return ret; }int xe_exec_ioctl (struct drm_device *dev,void *data,struct drm_file *file)
@@ -340,6 +344,7 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)if (err)xe_sched_job_put (job); err_exec: + vm->is_validating = false;drm_exec_fini (exec); err_unlock_list:up_read (&vm->lock);
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c +1 -1
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int __xe_ggtt_insert_bo_at(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_bo *bo,return 0 ; } - err =xe_bo_validate (bo,NULL , false); + err =xe_bo_validate (bo, bo->vm);if (err)return err;
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c +1 -1
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int xe_pf_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vma *vma,return err; }else if (bo) {/* Create backing store if needed */ - err =xe_bo_validate (bo, vm, true); + err =xe_bo_validate (bo, vm);if (err)return err; }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +10 -5
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int xe_gpuvm_validate(struct drm_gpuvm_bo *vm_bo, struct drm_exec *exec)list_move_tail (&gpuva_to_vma (gpuva)->combined_links.rebind, &vm->rebind_list); - ret =xe_bo_validate (gem_to_xe_bo (vm_bo->obj), vm, false); + ret =xe_bo_validate (gem_to_xe_bo (vm_bo->obj), vm);if (ret)return ret;
@@ -512,23 +512,27 @@ static int xe_preempt_work_begin(struct drm_exec *exec, struct xe_vm *vm,if (err)return err; + vm->is_validating = true;do { err =drm_gpuvm_validate (&vm->gpuvm, exec);if (err) -return err; + goto out; err =xe_vm_rebind (vm, true);if (err) -return err; + goto out; }while (!list_empty (&vm->gpuvm.evict.list));drm_exec_for_each_locked_object (exec, index, obj) { err =dma_resv_reserve_fences (obj->resv, vm->preempt.num_exec_queues);if (err) -return err; + goto out; }return 0 ; +out: + vm->is_validating = false; +return err; }static void preempt_rebind_work_func (struct work_struct *w)
@@ -617,6 +621,7 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w)up_read (&vm->userptr.notifier_lock); out_unlock: + vm->is_validating = false;drm_exec_fini (&exec); out_unlock_outer:if (err == -EAGAIN ) {
@@ -1848,7 +1853,7 @@ static int xe_vm_bind(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_exec_queuexe_bo_assert_held (bo);if (bo && immediate) { - err =xe_bo_validate (bo, vm, true); + err =xe_bo_validate (bo, vm);if (err)return err; }
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h +10 -0
@@ -268,6 +268,16 @@ struct xe_vm {u64 tlb_flush_seqno;/** @batch_invalidate_tlb: Always invalidate TLB before batch start */ bool batch_invalidate_tlb; + +/** +* @is_validaing: Whether we are validating the vm's local objects. +* This field is protected by the vm's resv. Note that this +* is needed only since TTM doesn't forward the ttm_operation_ctx to the +* eviction_valuable() callback, so if / when that is in place, this +* should be removed. +*/ +bool is_validating; +/** @xef: XE file handle for tracking this VM's drm client */ struct xe_file *xef; };
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Thomas Hellström
maintainerPATCH 7/7 drm/xe/bo: Allow eviction of unbound local bos
In reply to Thomas HellströmLocal bos that don't have any gpu_vmas set up are allowed to be evicted. Support that.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c +4 -0
@@ -1029,10 +1029,14 @@ static bool xe_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *ttm_bo,if (vm && !drm_gpuvm_is_extobj (&vm->gpuvm, &ttm_bo->base) && vm->is_validating) {xe_vm_assert_held (vm); +/* Not bound to the vm? */ +if (list_empty (&ttm_bo->base.gpuva.list)) + goto allow;return false; } } +allow:return ttm_bo_eviction_valuable (ttm_bo, place); }
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Patchwork
CI✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe: Rework rebinding and allow same-vm eviction
In reply to Thomas Hellström== Series Details ==
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/xe: Rework rebinding and allow same-vm eviction
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131421/
State : failure
== Summary ==
=== Applying kernel patches on branch 'drm-tip' with base: ===
Base commit: 9ae91289c9ed drm-tip: 2024y-03m-21d-13h-03m-03s UTC integration manifest === git am output follows ===
error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c:96
error: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c:100
error: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c:1235
error: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:485
error: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h:242
error: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h: patch does not apply
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Applying: drm/xe: Use ring ops TLB invalidation for rebinds
Applying: drm/xe: Rework rebinding
Applying: drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
Applying: drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
Patch failed at 0004 drm/xe: Reserve fences where needed
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".