bootconfig: Fix integer overflow problems
Subsystems (2)
Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
maintainerv4 cover bootconfig: Fix integer overflow problems
Hi,
Here are v4 patches to fix bootconfig size overflow issue. If there is a wrong bootconfig size is recorded, it can bypass the size check in the tool and the kernel.
Here is the previous version.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/178900555453.200943.4719889510443114485.stgit@devnote2/
This version removes redundant and wrong size check in setup_boot_config() and add correct error message for size > XBC_DATA_MAX.
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (2):
tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks
bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check
init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- tools/bootconfig/main.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
maintainerPATCH v4 1/2 tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Sashiko reported that on 32-bit systems, if an attacker crafts size in the bootconfig footer such that adding BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE wraps around (for instance, if size is 0xFFFFFFFF), the size check in load_xbc_from_initrd() can be bypassed:
if (stat.st_size < size + BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) {
pr_err("bootconfig size is too big\n");
return -E2BIG;
}Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, comparing a corrupted 32-bit size (e.g. 0xFFFFFFFF) against
stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE can also bypass the check if size is not bounded. Similarly, load_xbc_file() passes 64-bit stat.st_size directly into the 32-bit int size parameter of load_xbc_fd(), truncating large standalone files (>= 2GB).
In both cases, passing 0xFFFFFFFF to load_xbc_fd() truncates to -1, resulting in malloc(0), an integer overflow in read(), and an out-of-bounds null-byte write.
Fix this by:
1. Rejecting size > XBC_DATA_MAX or
size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE in load_xbc_from_initrd().
2. Rejecting stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX in load_xbc_file() before passing it to load_xbc_fd().
3. Checking size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX defensively in load_xbc_fd().
---
Changes in v3:
- Reject size > XBC_DATA_MAX and
size > stat.st_size - BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE in load_xbc_from_initrd() to prevent bypass on initrd > 4.29 GB.
- Check stat.st_size > XBC_DATA_MAX in load_xbc_file() to prevent truncation on large standalone files.
- Check size < 0 || size > XBC_DATA_MAX defensively in load_xbc_fd().
Changes in v2:
- Add Cc: stable.
- Also reject if "size > XBC_DATA_MAX", that is obviously wrong.
--- tools/bootconfig/main.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/bootconfig/main.c +12 -1
@@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ static int load_xbc_fd(int fd, char **buf, int size) {int ret; +if (size <0 || size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) +return -EINVAL ; + *buf =malloc (size +1 );if (!*buf)return -ENOMEM ;
@@ -168,6 +171,13 @@ static int load_xbc_file(const char *path, char **buf)return ret; } +if (stat.st_size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) { +pr_err ("%s size is too big\n" , path); + ret = -E2BIG ; +close (fd); +return ret; + } + ret =load_xbc_fd (fd, buf, stat.st_size);close (fd);
@@ -218,7 +228,8 @@ static int load_xbc_from_initrd(int fd, char **buf) csum =le32toh (csum);/* Wrong size error */ -if (stat.st_size < size +BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE ) { +if (size >XBC_DATA_MAX || + size > stat.st_size -BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE ) {pr_err ("bootconfig size is too big\n" );return -E2BIG ; }
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] tools/bootconfig: Fix integer overflow and truncation in size checks
Quoted 83 lines · Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Sashiko reported that on 32-bit systems, if an attacker crafts size in the bootconfig footer such that adding
BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZEwraps around (for instance, if size is0xFFFFFFFF), the size check inload_xbc_from_initrd()can be bypassed:if (stat.st_size < size + BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE) { pr_err("bootconfig size is too big\n"); return -E2BIG; }Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, comparing a corrupted 32-bit size (e.g.
0xFFFFFFFF) against
stat.st_size -BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZEcan also bypass the check if size is not bounded. Similarly,load_xbc_file()passes 64-bit stat.st_size directly into the 32-bit int size parameter ofload_xbc_fd(), truncating large standalone files (>= 2GB).In both cases, passing
0xFFFFFFFFtoload_xbc_fd()truncates to -1, resulting in malloc(0), an integer overflow inread(), and an out-of-bounds null-byte write.Fix this by:
1. Rejecting size >XBC_DATA_MAXor
size > stat.st_size -BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZEinload_xbc_from_initrd().
2. Rejecting stat.st_size >XBC_DATA_MAXinload_xbc_file()before passing it toload_xbc_fd().
3. Checking size < 0 || size >XBC_DATA_MAXdefensively inload_xbc_fd().Fixes 950313ebf79c ("tools: bootconfig: Add bootconfig command")Reported-by Sashiko <[email protected]>Assisted-by Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flashSigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>---
Changes in v3:
- Reject size >XBC_DATA_MAXand
size > stat.st_size -BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZEinload_xbc_from_initrd()to prevent bypass on initrd > 4.29 GB.
- Check stat.st_size >XBC_DATA_MAXinload_xbc_file()to prevent truncation on large standalone files.
- Check size < 0 || size >XBC_DATA_MAXdefensively inload_xbc_fd().
Changes in v2:
- Add Cc: stable.
- Also reject if "size >XBC_DATA_MAX", that is obviously wrong.--- tools/bootconfig/main.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)tools/bootconfig/main.c +10
-0@@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ static int load_xbc_fd(int fd, char **buf, int size) {int ret; +if (size <0 || size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) +return -EINVAL ; + *buf =malloc (size +1 );if (!*buf)return -ENOMEM ;@@ -168,6 +171,13 @@ static int load_xbc_file(const char *path, char **buf)return ret; } +if (stat.st_size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) { +pr_err ("%s size is too big\n" , path); + ret = -E2BIG ; +close (fd); +return ret; + } + ret =load_xbc_fd (fd, buf, stat.st_size);close (fd);
tools/bootconfig/main.c static int load_xbc_from_initrd(int fd, char **buf) · line 235
Quoted 9 lines
tools/bootconfig/main.c +2
-1@@ -218,7 +228,8 @@ static int load_xbc_from_initrd(int fd, char **buf) csum =le32toh (csum);/* Wrong size error */ -if (stat.st_size < size +BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE ) { +if (size >XBC_DATA_MAX || + size > stat.st_size -BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE ) {pr_err ("bootconfig size is too big\n" );return -E2BIG ; }
Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
maintainerPATCH v4 2/2 bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check
In reply to Masami Hiramatsu (Google)From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Sashiko reported that in get_boot_config_from_initrd(), a crafted initrd with a huge bootconfig size (such as 0xFFFFFFFF) can cause the pointer arithmetic:
data = ((void *)hdr) - size;
to wrap around on 32-bit systems (or when pointer subtraction overflows). Because data wraps around, the subsequent bounds check:
if ((unsigned long)data < initrd_start)
evaluates to false, bypassing the check. The kernel then calls xbc_calc_checksum(data, size), which attempts to read 4GB of memory, hitting unmapped pages and triggering a fatal kernel page fault during early boot. Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, an unbounded 32-bit size can similarly bypass the initrd_start check.
Fix this by:
1. Ensuring the initrd is at least large enough to contain the bootconfig footer and verifying hdr is within the initrd bounds.
2. Checking that size does not exceed XBC_DATA_MAX and does not exceed the available space between initrd_start and hdr before performing pointer subtraction.
---
Changes in v4:
- Accurate the error message for size > XBC_DATA_MAX in get_boot_config_from_initrd().
- Remove redundant (and wrong) size >= XBC_DATA_MAX check from setup_boot_config().
--- init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
init/main.c +15 -10
@@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size)u8 *hdr;int i; -if (!initrd_end) +if (!initrd_end || initrd_end < initrd_start || + initrd_end - initrd_start <BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN +8 )return NULL ; data = (char *)initrd_end -BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN ;
@@ -294,16 +295,26 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) found: hdr = (u8 *)(data -8 ); +if ((unsigned long )hdr < initrd_start) +return NULL ; + size =get_unaligned_le32 (hdr); csum =get_unaligned_le32 (hdr +4 ); - data = ((void *)hdr) - size; -if ((unsigned long )data < initrd_start) { -pr_err ("bootconfig size %d is greater than initrd size %ld\n" , +if (size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) { +pr_err ("bootconfig size %u is greater than max size %d\n" , + size,XBC_DATA_MAX ); +return NULL ; + } + +if (size > ((unsigned long )hdr - initrd_start)) { +pr_err ("bootconfig size %u is greater than initrd size %lu\n" , size, initrd_end - initrd_start);return NULL ; } + data = ((void *)hdr) - size; +if (xbc_calc_checksum (data, size) != csum) {pr_err ("bootconfig checksum failed\n" );return NULL ;
@@ -394,12 +405,6 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void)return ; } -if (size >=XBC_DATA_MAX ) { -pr_err ("bootconfig size %ld greater than max size %d\n" , - (long )size,XBC_DATA_MAX ); -return ; - } - ret =xbc_init (data, size, &msg, &pos);if (ret <0 ) {if (pos <0 )
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check
Quoted 48 lines · Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Sashiko reported that in
get_boot_config_from_initrd(), a crafted initrd with a huge bootconfig size (such as0xFFFFFFFF) can cause the pointer arithmetic:data = ((void *)hdr) - size;to wrap around on 32-bit systems (or when pointer subtraction overflows). Because data wraps around, the subsequent bounds check:
if ((unsigned long)data <
initrd_start)evaluates to false, bypassing the check. The kernel then calls
xbc_calc_checksum(data, size), which attempts to read 4GB of memory, hitting unmapped pages and triggering a fatal kernel page fault during early boot. Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, an unbounded 32-bit size can similarly bypass theinitrd_startcheck.Fix this by:
1. Ensuring the initrd is at least large enough to contain the bootconfig footer and verifying hdr is within the initrd bounds.
2. Checking that size does not exceedXBC_DATA_MAXand does not exceed the available space betweeninitrd_startand hdr before performing pointer subtraction.Fixes de462e5f1071 ("bootconfig: Fix to remove bootconfig data from initrd while boot")Reported-by Sashiko <[email protected]>Assisted-by Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flashSigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>---
Changes in v4:
- Accurate the error message for size >XBC_DATA_MAXinget_boot_config_from_initrd().
- Remove redundant (and wrong) size >=XBC_DATA_MAXcheck fromsetup_boot_config().--- init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)init/main.c +0
-0
init/main.c static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) · line 282
Quoted 7 lines
init/main.c +2
-1@@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size)u8 *hdr;int i; -if (!initrd_end) +if (!initrd_end || initrd_end < initrd_start || + initrd_end - initrd_start <BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN +8 )return NULL ;
(nit) how about moving BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZE from tools and using it instead?
Quoted 32 lines
init/main.c +13
-3data = (char *)initrd_end -BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN ;@@ -294,16 +295,26 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) found: hdr = (u8 *)(data -8 ); +if ((unsigned long )hdr < initrd_start) +return NULL ; + size =get_unaligned_le32 (hdr); csum =get_unaligned_le32 (hdr +4 ); - data = ((void *)hdr) - size; -if ((unsigned long )data < initrd_start) { -pr_err ("bootconfig size %d is greater than initrd size %ld\n" , +if (size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) { +pr_err ("bootconfig size %u is greater than max size %d\n" , + size,XBC_DATA_MAX ); +return NULL ; + } + +if (size > ((unsigned long )hdr - initrd_start)) { +pr_err ("bootconfig size %u is greater than initrd size %lu\n" , size, initrd_end - initrd_start);return NULL ; } + data = ((void *)hdr) - size; +if (xbc_calc_checksum (data, size) != csum) {pr_err ("bootconfig checksum failed\n" );return NULL ;
init/main.c static void __init setup_boot_config(void) · line 402
Quoted 9 lines
init/main.c +0
-6@@ -394,12 +405,6 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void)return ; } -if (size >=XBC_DATA_MAX ) { -pr_err ("bootconfig size %ld greater than max size %d\n" , - (long )size,XBC_DATA_MAX ); -return ; - } -
Nice cleanup!
init/main.c static void __init setup_boot_config(void) · line 410
Quoted 4 lines
init/main.c +0
-0ret =xbc_init (data, size, &msg, &pos);if (ret <0 ) {if (pos <0 )
Thanks for doing this work!
Best regards,
Sang-Heon Jeon
Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
maintainerRe: [PATCH v4 2/2] bootconfig: Fix integer overflow in initrd size check
Quoted 53 lines · On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:29:48 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 51 lines · Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
Sashiko reported that in
get_boot_config_from_initrd(), a crafted initrd with a huge bootconfig size (such as0xFFFFFFFF) can cause the pointer arithmetic:data = ((void *)hdr) - size;to wrap around on 32-bit systems (or when pointer subtraction overflows). Because data wraps around, the subsequent bounds check:
if ((unsigned long)data <
initrd_start)evaluates to false, bypassing the check. The kernel then calls
xbc_calc_checksum(data, size), which attempts to read 4GB of memory, hitting unmapped pages and triggering a fatal kernel page fault during early boot. Furthermore, on 64-bit systems with an initrd > 4.29 GB, an unbounded 32-bit size can similarly bypass theinitrd_startcheck.Fix this by:
1. Ensuring the initrd is at least large enough to contain the bootconfig footer and verifying hdr is within the initrd bounds.
2. Checking that size does not exceedXBC_DATA_MAXand does not exceed the available space betweeninitrd_startand hdr before performing pointer subtraction.Fixes de462e5f1071 ("bootconfig: Fix to remove bootconfig data from initrd while boot")Reported-by Sashiko <[email protected]>Assisted-by Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flashSigned-off-by Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>---
Changes in v4:
- Accurate the error message for size >XBC_DATA_MAXinget_boot_config_from_initrd().
- Remove redundant (and wrong) size >=XBC_DATA_MAXcheck fromsetup_boot_config().--- init/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)init/main.c +0
-0@@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size)u8 *hdr;int i;
Quoted 6 lines
init/main.c static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) · line 282
Quoted 4 lines
init/main.c +2
-1-if (!initrd_end) +if (!initrd_end || initrd_end < initrd_start || + initrd_end - initrd_start <BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN +8 )return NULL ;(nit) how about moving
BOOTCONFIG_FOOTER_SIZEfrom tools and using it instead?
OK, that will be done in cleanup patch.
Quoted 45 lines
Quoted 33 lines
init/main.c +13
-3data = (char *)initrd_end -BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN ;@@ -294,16 +295,26 @@ static void * __init get_boot_config_from_initrd(size_t *_size) found: hdr = (u8 *)(data -8 ); +if ((unsigned long )hdr < initrd_start) +return NULL ; + size =get_unaligned_le32 (hdr); csum =get_unaligned_le32 (hdr +4 ); - data = ((void *)hdr) - size; -if ((unsigned long )data < initrd_start) { -pr_err ("bootconfig size %d is greater than initrd size %ld\n" , +if (size >XBC_DATA_MAX ) { +pr_err ("bootconfig size %u is greater than max size %d\n" , + size,XBC_DATA_MAX ); +return NULL ; + } + +if (size > ((unsigned long )hdr - initrd_start)) { +pr_err ("bootconfig size %u is greater than initrd size %lu\n" , size, initrd_end - initrd_start);return NULL ; } + data = ((void *)hdr) - size; +if (xbc_calc_checksum (data, size) != csum) {pr_err ("bootconfig checksum failed\n" );return NULL ;init/main.c static void __init setup_boot_config(void) · line 402
Quoted 9 lines
init/main.c +0
-6@@ -394,12 +405,6 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void)return ; } -if (size >=XBC_DATA_MAX ) { -pr_err ("bootconfig size %ld greater than max size %d\n" , - (long )size,XBC_DATA_MAX ); -return ; - } -Nice cleanup!
Quoted 9 lines
init/main.c static void __init setup_boot_config(void) · line 410
Quoted 4 lines
init/main.c +0
-0ret =xbc_init (data, size, &msg, &pos);if (ret <0 ) {if (pos <0 )Thanks for doing this work!
Reviewed-by Sang-Heon Jeon <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>