Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Bug in large files ext2 in 2.4.0-test11 ?

DISCUSSION Petr Vandrovec 2 participants 2 messages Nov 20, 2000

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Zdenek Kabelac

I just noticed this problem -
I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.

This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
total 33

Quoted 8 lines
drwxr-xr-x    6 root     root         4096 Nov 20 18:06 .
drwxr-xr-x   42 root     root         1024 Nov 20 14:02 ..
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Nov 19 15:50 X
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root        16384 Sep 30 18:45 lost+found

ls: zero: Value too large for defined data type

but maybe its incompatibility in libc - anyway I'm using uptodate Debian Woody if this helps.

It is problem with Debian's glibc, it is compiled with 2.2.x kernel headers. I filled bugreport against this few weeks ago, but it was marked as inappropriate because of Debian glibc is built against newest kernel-headers package, and newest kernel-headers package is still 2.2.x.

Maybe someone (you) should fill bug against kernel-headers or kernel-source to get 2.4.x into Debian. Then Ben Collins (Debian glibc maintainer) can recompile and officially release glibc compiled against 2.4.x kernel.
Best regards,
Petr Vandrovec [email protected]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

#1 lore raw
Quoted 20 lines · Petr Vandrovec
Quoted 5 lines · Zdenek Kabelac

I just noticed this problem -
I'm missing some large files created in the filesystem.

This is 'ls' output from 2.4.0-test11/test10
total 33

Quoted 8 lines
drwxr-xr-x    6 root     root         4096 Nov 20 18:06 .
drwxr-xr-x   42 root     root         1024 Nov 20 14:02 ..
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Nov 19 15:50 X
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root        16384 Sep 30 18:45 lost+found

ls: zero: Value too large for defined data type

but maybe its incompatibility in libc - anyway I'm using uptodate Debian Woody if this helps.

It is problem with Debian's glibc, it is compiled with 2.2.x kernel headers. I filled bugreport against this few weeks ago, but it was marked as inappropriate because of Debian glibc is built against newest kernel-headers package, and newest kernel-headers package is still 2.2.x.

Quoted 6 lines

Maybe someone (you) should fill bug against kernel-headers or kernel-source to get 2.4.x into Debian. Then Ben Collins (Debian glibc maintainer) can recompile and officially release glibc compiled against 2.4.x kernel.
Best regards,
Petr Vandrovec [email protected]

Does kernel 2.4.x compile and run well for all of our supported archs? Do programs compiled against a glibc with LFS (2.4.x kernel) support, and using that LFS support, work on kernel 2.2.x machines?

If the answer to the first one is "no", then the spread of LFS will be slow in Debian, until 2.4.0 becomes stable enough to use. If the answer to the second is "no", then you wont see LFS support in Debian till post woody.

Secondly, anyone who thinks they know what they are doing, can simply download the Debian glibc sources files, and build against kernel-2.4.0 headers with this simple command:

LINUX_SOURCE=/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11 apt-get -b source glibc

Simple, eh? :)

Ben

Signature · 8 lines
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [email protected]  --  [email protected]  --  [email protected]  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/