Skip to contentSkip to conversation

beware of dead string constants

DISCUSSION Michael Elizabeth Chastain 2 participants 2 messages Nov 22, 2000 – Nov 23, 2000

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines

Jakub Jelinek claims to have fixed this particular bug in the last week or so, although I have not downloaded and compiled recent CVS to verify this.

I have a compiler from gcc.gnu.org's CVS tree that's only a few days old, so I can verify Jakub's claim.

It Works For Me (tm).

There is a considerable amount of engineering and testing and releasology and distribution between "CVS compiler" and "production compiler for kernel builds" though.

Quoted 1 line

and according to Jeff Law, this case is *not* fixed yet.

My compiler behaves as Jeff says.

Michael Elizabeth Chastain
<mailto:[email protected]>
"love without fear"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Michael Elizabeth Chastain

I have a compiler from gcc.gnu.org's CVS tree that's only a few days old, so I can verify Jakub's claim.

BTW, do you have any estimate of how much dead string space it actually removed ? (I.e. did the .data segment size change significantly, or was is lost in the normal inter-gcc-version noise ?)

Just curious,
- Werner

Signature · 7 lines
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH           [email protected] /
/_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/