Another report of mozilla in D state, related to the 'uninterruptible sleep' thread
Second time around, I didn't evoke any interest the first time.
I reported it back on Mar/27. It is still an almost daily problem requiring a reboot. Mozilla gets stuck in down_write_failed. This time I'm sure it's not reiser's fault.
# uname -r 2.4.3-pre8
mozilla-bin D C781849C 0 21055 1 (NOTLB) 20611
Call Trace: [<ff000000>] [<ff000000>] [<ff000000>]
[leaf_copy_items+121/252]
[leaf_paste_in_buffer+239/672] [leaf_cut_from_buffer+486/984] [leaf_cut_from_buffer+863/984] [balance_leaf+8645/9544] [balance_leaf+9225/9544] [leaf_item_bottle+916/1260] [balance_leaf+9505/9544] [balance_leaf+9225/9544] [leaf_item_bottle+916/1260] [balance_leaf+9505/9544] [<f0000000>] [bin_search_in_dir_item+58/196] [leaf_copy_items+121/252] [leaf_paste_in_buffer+239/672] [<d086f044>] [flush_commit_list+66/908] [flush_journal_list+531/944] [free_list_bitmaps+30/60] [reiserfs_unlink+167/460] [posix_lock_file+526/1232] [empty_bad_page+3213/4096] [empty_bad_page+2717/4096] [fib_flag_trans+35/60] [empty_bad_pte_table+3363/4096]
If someone is actually interested, it'd be neat to get this fixed.
-d
--
There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum
Quoted 3 lines · David Ford
I reported it back on Mar/27. It is still an almost daily problem requiring a reboot. Mozilla gets stuck in
down_write_failed. This time I'm sure it's not reiser's fault.
Definitely nothing to do with ReiserFS as I've had this happen and
don't even have that FS compiled in. 2.4.3 (vanilla) was the kernel. No trace or anything (quick grep of /var/log/kern.log* for past week or so confirms), strace -p on it got nowhere at all.
-Ath
Signature · 4 lines
- Athanasius = Athanasius(at)miggy.org / http://www.miggy.org/
Finger athan(at)fysh.org for PGP key
"And it's me who is my enemy. Me who beats me up.
Me who makes the monsters. Me who strips my confidence." Paula Cole - MEov511 problem
Hi
I am trying to get working a Spacec@m 300 (USB) by Trust. I tried this under 2.2.18 and 2.4.3. In order to get the camera detected I can use the usb-uhci or uhci module (the result is the same). The camera gets detected (some OV7610 gets probed - I don't know if this is the correct one) and after loading the ov511 module I get the picture of the camera displayed with xawt-3.38 (resolution 640x480 - the camera is able to this). The problem I am running into is that the framerate is extremely slow (maybe 3 fps), however, from the specifications it should work with 30 fps. My system is a Pentium II with 300 Mhz. Some Miro TV card with a BT848 chip works fine with the bttv driver.
Do you have any idea ?
If you need more info, just let me know. I am also willing to do some tests...
--
Thomas
Re: ov511 problem
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Thomas Speck wrote:
IIRC the driver doesn't support compression, and there is no way you can get 640x480 uncompressed at 30 fps over USB...
/cyr
Quoted 17 lines
Hi
I am trying to get working a Spacec@m 300 (USB) by Trust. I tried this under 2.2.18 and 2.4.3. In order to get the camera detected I can use the usb-uhci or uhci module (the result is the same). The camera gets detected (some OV7610 gets probed - I don't know if this is the correct one) and after loading the ov511 module I get the picture of the camera displayed with xawt-3.38 (resolution 640x480 - the camera is able to this). The problem I am running into is that the framerate is extremely slow (maybe 3 fps), however, from the specifications it should work with 30 fps. My system is a Pentium II with 300 Mhz. Some Miro TV card with a BT848 chip works fine with the bttv driver.
Do you have any idea ?
If you need more info, just let me know. I am also willing to do some tests...
Quoted 11 lines
--
Thomas-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Holly: I was in love once -- a Sinclair ZX-81. People said, "No, Holly, she's not for you." She was cheap, she was stupid and she wouldn't load -- well, not for me, anyway.
Re: ov511 problem
ov511 supports compression, but it doesn't always work yet. Even with compression, you will only get 12-15 FPS at 640x480 at most. USB just can't do better than that with this type of compression algorithm.
If you want to try compression, use the "compress=1" and "ttpp=1" parameters with the ov511 1.35 module. You will likely get garbage, but this will give you an idea of what the frame rate will be like once I have it working.
Quoted 18 lines · Erik Gustavsson
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Thomas Speck wrote:
IIRC the driver doesn't support compression, and there is no way you can get 640x480 uncompressed at 30 fps over USB...
Quoted 13 lines
I am trying to get working a Spacec@m 300 (USB) by Trust. I tried this under 2.2.18 and 2.4.3. In order to get the camera detected I can use the usb-uhci or uhci module (the result is the same). The camera gets detected (some OV7610 gets probed - I don't know if this is the correct one) and after loading the ov511 module I get the picture of the camera displayed with xawt-3.38 (resolution 640x480 - the camera is able to this). The problem I am running into is that the framerate is extremely slow (maybe 3 fps), however, from the specifications it should work with 30 fps. My system is a Pentium II with 300 Mhz. Some Miro TV card with a BT848 chip works fine with the bttv driver.
Do you have any idea ?
If you need more info, just let me know. I am also willing to do some tests...
--
Mark McClelland
[email protected]