Linux 2.4.3-ac12
Quoted 5 lines
My belief however is that several million people have gcc 2.96-69+, about 50 are likely to have random cvs snapshots and none of them are going to build kernels with them anyway, as they wont work
__builtin_expector otherwise.Alan
I will not add fuel to the fire, but isn't 2.4.XX the "stable" version? And I think most people (here in Europe :-) are running 2.95.2 at the moment. But, yes the previously patches fixed it.
Thanks,
Dieter
Signature · 11 lines
Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science Cognitive Systems Group Vogt-Kölln-Straße 30 D-22527 Hamburg, Germany email: [email protected] @home: [email protected]
Quoted 10 lines · On 04.22 Dieter Nützel wrote:
Quoted 5 lines
My belief however is that several million people have gcc 2.96-69+, about 50 are likely to have random cvs snapshots and none of them are going to build kernels with them anyway, as they wont work
__builtin_expector otherwise.Alan
I will not add fuel to the fire, but isn't 2.4.XX the "stable" version? And I think most people (here in Europe :-) are running 2.95.2 at the moment. But, yes the previously patches fixed it.
That's going to change in a few weeks, I suspect. Dunno about SuSE, but just released Mandrake 8.0 and RedHat 7.1 ship gcc-2.96.
Signature · 4 lines
J.A. Magallon # Let the source mailto:[email protected] # be with you, Luke... Linux werewolf 2.4.3-ac12 #1 SMP Sun Apr 22 10:27:22 CEST 2001 i686