Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Vendor kernels unpakced

ANNOUNCE Christoph Hellwig 4 participants 6 messages Aug 10, 2001

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I'd like to announce a the availability of unpacked vendor kernel RPMs on www.kernelnewbies.org. We allow taking a look at the specfile and the various patches included in that packages. Currently the follwing kernel packages are prvovided (others are of course welcome):

	Caldera OpenLinux 3.1 (linux-2.4.2-11)
	Red Hat Linux 7.1 (kernel-2.4.2-2)

Please take a look at http://www.kernelnewbies.org/kernels/

#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Christoph Hellwig

I'd like to announce a the availability of unpacked vendor kernel RPMs on www.kernelnewbies.org. We allow taking a look at the specfile and the various patches included in that packages. Currently the follwing kernel packages are prvovided (others are of course welcome):

	Caldera OpenLinux 3.1 (linux-2.4.2-11)
	Red Hat Linux 7.1 (kernel-2.4.2-2)

Please take a look at http://www.kernelnewbies.org/kernels/

Please put RH 2.4.3-12 kernel online, instead. I guess that 99% of the people out there that read lk and/or understand what you did, have little interest on an outdated kernel package. Of course this applies to Caldera's kernel updates (if any), too.

.TM.

Signature · 5 lines
      ____/  ____/   /
     /      /       /			Marco Colombo
    ___/  ___  /   /		      Technical Manager
   /          /   /			 ESI s.r.l.
 _____/ _____/  _/		       [email protected]
#2 lore raw
In reply to Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 11 lines · Marco Colombo
Quoted 9 lines · Christoph Hellwig

I'd like to announce a the availability of unpacked vendor kernel RPMs on www.kernelnewbies.org. We allow taking a look at the specfile and the various patches included in that packages. Currently the follwing kernel packages are prvovided (others are of course welcome):

	Caldera OpenLinux 3.1 (linux-2.4.2-11)
	Red Hat Linux 7.1 (kernel-2.4.2-2)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line

Please take a look at http://www.kernelnewbies.org/kernels/

Please put RH 2.4.3-12 kernel online, instead. I guess that 99% of the people out there that read lk and/or understand what you did, have little interest on an outdated kernel package. Of course this applies to Caldera's kernel updates (if any), too.

I'm not too happy with that as there are just too many kernel updates in a product livecycle.

Christoph

Signature · 1 line
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
#3 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 13 lines · Marco Colombo
Quoted 10 lines · Christoph Hellwig

I'd like to announce a the availability of unpacked vendor kernel RPMs on www.kernelnewbies.org. We allow taking a look at the specfile and the various patches included in that packages. Currently the follwing kernel packages are prvovided (others are of course welcome):

	Caldera OpenLinux 3.1 (linux-2.4.2-11)
	Red Hat Linux 7.1 (kernel-2.4.2-2)

Please take a look at http://www.kernelnewbies.org/kernels/

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Please put RH 2.4.3-12 kernel online, instead. I guess that 99% of the people out there that read lk and/or understand what you did, have little interest on an outdated kernel package. Of course this applies to Caldera's kernel updates (if any), too.

I'm not too happy with that as there are just too many kernel updates in a product livecycle.

I guess you'll keep the major distro release up to date. These are the kernel released by RH since 6.2 (not sure of the dates):

kernel-2.2.14-5.0 Mar 2000 - Red Hat 6.2
kernel-2.2.14-12 Apr 2000
kernel-2.2.16-3 Jun 2000

kernel-2.2.16-22 Sep 2000 - Red Hat 7
kernel-2.2.17-1 Feb 2001

kernel-2.4.2-2 Apr 2001 - Red Hat 7.1
kernel-2.4.3-12 Jun 2001

The kernel is a moving target. If you can deal with more than a distribution, you can deal with 1 or 2 kernel updates per release, IMVHO.

You know, outdated info if useless info.

.TM.

Signature · 5 lines
      ____/  ____/   /
     /      /       /			Marco Colombo
    ___/  ___  /   /		      Technical Manager
   /          /   /			 ESI s.r.l.
 _____/ _____/  _/		       [email protected]
#4 lore raw

Marco Colombo <[email protected]> said:

[...]

Quoted 2 lines

The kernel is a moving target. If you can deal with more than a distribution, you can deal with 1 or 2 kernel updates per release, IMVHO.

Just as it makes no sense to run a not-up-to-date release kernel, it makes no sense to keep anything but the very last on line. Just MVHO.

Signature · 4 lines
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                Usuario #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
#5 lore raw
In reply to Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 3 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 1 line

Please put RH 2.4.3-12 kernel online, instead.

I'm not too happy with that as there are just too many kernel updates in a product livecycle.

Agreed. Just maintaining an archive of 'what kernel was released on which CD' is enough work already. Adding a ptr to each vendors area of updates is probably the next thing to add though.

btw: I just added SuSE 7.2 to the list.

regards,

Dave.

Signature · 2 lines
| Dave Jones.        http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs