Skip to contentSkip to conversation

losetuping files in tmpfs fails?

DISCUSSION Frédéric L. W. Meunier 3 participants 3 messages Jan 5, 2002 – Jan 6, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

On a side note, why do I need to use losetup -d after umount when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts ?

mount or loop "feature" ?

Signature · 1 line
0@pervalidus.{net, {dyndns.}org} Tel: 55-21-2717-2399 (Niterói-RJ BR)
#1 lore raw
Followup to:  <20020105215147.GH136@pervalidus>
By author:    =?iso-8859-1?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier <[email protected]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Quoted 6 lines

On a side note, why do I need to use losetup -d after umount when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts ?

mount or loop "feature" ?

/proc/mounts, unlike /etc/mtab, doesn't tell umount(8) that this was a loopback created by mount(8) as opposed to a preexisting loopback created by losetup(8).

-hpa

Signature · 3 lines
<[email protected]> at work, <[email protected]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<[email protected]>
#2 lore raw
In reply to Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Quoted 4 lines · F.W. Meunier

On a side note, why do I need to use losetup -d after umount when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts ?

mount or loop "feature" ?

mount will do losetup -d at umount time if and only if it did losetup at mount time, as is recorded in /etc/mtab. With a symlink that info is lost. See mount(8).