report
Hi,
During booting got this:
Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: Total of 2 processors activated (5039.71 BogoMIPS) Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: enabling symmetric IO mode... ...done. Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: init IO_APIC IRQs Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-0, 2-16, 2-17, 2-18, 2-19, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22, 2-23 not connected. Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: number of MP IRQ sources: 16. Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: number of IO-APIC #2 registers: 24. Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: testing the IO APIC....................... Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: IO APIC #2...... Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #00: 02000000 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : physical APIC id: 02 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #01: 00178011 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : max redirection entries: 0017 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : IO APIC version: 0011 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: to [email protected] Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #02: 00000000 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : arbitration: 00 Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... IRQ redirection table:
...
any idea?;)
Signature · 3 lines
Michal Sajdak --> xterm --> LinuxNews Team. GPG: http://urtica.linuxnews.pl/~xterm/key/ [ http://hardware.linuxnews.pl/ ] - [ http://linuxnews.pl/ ]
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Michal Sajdak wrote:
| Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: IO APIC #2...... | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #00: 02000000 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : physical APIC id: 02 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #01: 00178011 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : max redirection entries: 0017 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : IO APIC version: 0011 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: to [email protected] | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #02: 00000000 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : arbitration: 00
| any idea?;)
Sure.
a. It is almost always correct to include the kernel version number with Linux kernel problem/trouble/bug reports.
b. This is version 2.4.N, N < 16. 2.4.16 recognizes this one.
c. It's harmless (the message), but you can upgrade if you want to. Or you can just ignore it.
Signature · 1 line
~Randy
Quoted 7 lines
| Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : IO APIC version: 0011 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: to [email protected] | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #02: 00000000 | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : arbitration: 00| any idea?;)
Thanks a lot
Quoted 2 lines
a. It is almost always correct to include the kernel version number with Linux kernel problem/trouble/bug reports.
yap, and probably my hardware configuration...
Quoted 1 line
b. This is version 2.4.N, N < 16. 2.4.16 recognizes this one.
In fact it is 2.2.20.
Quoted 2 lines
c. It's harmless (the message), but you can upgrade if you want to. Or you can just ignore it.
btw any chance in 2.2.21?
greets
Signature · 3 lines
Michal Sajdak --> xterm --> LinuxNews Team. GPG: http://urtica.linuxnews.pl/~xterm/key/ [ http://hardware.linuxnews.pl/ ] - [ http://linuxnews.pl/ ]
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michal Sajdak wrote:
| > | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : IO APIC version: 0011 | > | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail | > | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: to [email protected] | > | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: .... register #02: 00000000 | > | Apr 30 06:34:25 ruda kernel: ....... : arbitration: 00 | > | > | any idea?;) | Thanks a lot | > a. It is almost always correct to include the kernel version | > number with Linux kernel problem/trouble/bug reports. | yap, and probably my hardware configuration... | > b. This is version 2.4.N, N < 16. 2.4.16 recognizes this one. | In fact it is 2.2.20. | > c. It's harmless (the message), but you can upgrade if you want to. | > Or you can just ignore it. | btw any chance in 2.2.21?
Not that I know of, but I haven't been tracking 2.2 changes, and I didn't make the patch for 2.2 at all. Someone else might have picked it up and back-ported it, but I'm not aware of it.
Signature · 1 line
~Randy