Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ppp_deflate.o taints the kernel?

DISCUSSION Muli Ben-Yehuda 3 participants 4 messages May 23, 2002 – May 24, 2002 Network drivers

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Salutations,

The ppp_deflate.o module has the license string "BSD without advertisement clause". Loading this module appears to taint the kernel, which agrees with the allowed licenses list in include/module.h, and with list in latest modutils (2.4.16), obj/obj_gpl_license, where this license string does not appear.

I plead an utter lack of clue in regards to licenses, but assume that it's GPL compatible if it's distributed with the kernel. In that case, shouldn't it be added to the license list?

Thanks,

Signature · 4 lines
Monday 1 Forelithe 7466

http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/
http://syscalltrack.sf.net/
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines

I plead an utter lack of clue in regards to licenses, but assume that it's GPL compatible if it's distributed with the kernel. In that case, shouldn't it be added to the license list?

FAQ item - BSD license doesnt guarantee we have source. If its GPL compatible someone should slap a GPL header on our copy and be done with it

#2 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · [email protected] said:

FAQ item - BSD license doesnt guarantee we have source. If its GPL
compatible someone should slap a GPL header on our copy and be done with it

It's already marked 'Dual BSD/GPL' in your tree and in 2.5, I believe. I fixed it when I did the zlib changes.

--
dwmw2

#3 lore raw

change ppp_deflate.o module license string [was: ppp_deflate.o taints the kernel?]

In reply to Alan Cox

Marcelo,

Please apply trivial patch to ppp_deflate.o to change module license to dual BSD/GPL, like 2.5, in order to avoid needlessly tainting the kernel.

drivers/net/ppp_deflate.c +1 -1
diff -ur linux-2.4.19-pre8-vanilla/drivers/net/ppp_deflate.c linux-2.4.19-pre8/drivers/net/ppp_deflate.c
@@ -657,4 +657,4 @@
 
 module_init(deflate_init);
 module_exit(deflate_cleanup);
-MODULE_LICENSE("BSD without advertisement clause");
+MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
Quoted 8 lines · David Woodhouse
Quoted 3 lines · [email protected] said:

FAQ item - BSD license doesnt guarantee we have source. If its GPL
compatible someone should slap a GPL header on our copy and be done with it

It's already marked 'Dual BSD/GPL' in your tree and in 2.5, I believe. I fixed it when I did the zlib changes.

Signature · 4 lines
Trewsday 2 Forelithe 7466

http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/
http://syscalltrack.sf.net/