Skip to contentSkip to conversation

small 5575 PCI ATM fix

PATCH Petter 2 participants 3 messages Jun 18, 2002 ATM

lore
Share & tools
lore

Petter

author
#0 lore raw

I was grepping through some code, and noticed that the return value of a kmalloc in iphase.c was not checked.
A patch was sendt to the author, but this was the reply I got:

"Peter Wang is no longer a member of the Interphase team. Interphase does support the 5575 PCI ATM adapter with Linux, but for driver enhancements and fixes, we require a current software warranty contract. If you could send me the serial number and / or the MAC address of your adapter, I can verify your warranty status and have the latest driver sent to you."

I do not care about their driver since I do not have an ATM card, but the current driver should anyhow be fixed.

Please apply the patch below.

Regards

Petter Wahlman

drivers/atm/iphase.c Tue Jun 18 10:47:02 2002 renamed from drivers/atm/iphase.c Mon Feb 25 20:37:57 2002 +0 -0
@@ -2002,6 +2002,10 @@
         }
         iadev->desc_tbl = kmalloc(iadev->num_tx_desc *
                                    sizeof(struct desc_tbl_t),

GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!iadev->desc_tbl) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR DEV_LABEL " couldn't get mem\n");
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }

        /* Communication Queues base address */
         i = TX_COMP_Q * iadev->memSize;
#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Petter

I was grepping through some code, and noticed that the return value of a kmalloc in iphase.c was not checked.
A patch was sendt to the author, but this was the reply I got:

"Peter Wang is no longer a member of the Interphase team. Interphase does support the 5575 PCI ATM adapter with Linux, but for driver enhancements and fixes, we require a current software warranty contract. If you could send me the serial number and / or the MAC address of your adapter, I can verify your warranty status and have the latest driver sent to you."

rofl. 8-)

Quoted 2 lines

I do not care about their driver since I do not have an ATM card, but the current driver should anyhow be fixed.

Error handling in that driver seems to be 'creative' at best. No releasing of already allocated resources, just returning -EAGAIN everywhere, and no checking for already allocated resources.

Someone with too much time on their hands[1] could probably clean this up to free allocated resources on failure and return -ENOMEM on allocation failures.

Dave

[1] or a 'software warranty contract'.

Signature · 2 lines
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Dave Jones

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Petter wrote:
Error handling in that driver seems to be 'creative' at best.

I agree.

Quoted 6 lines

No releasing of already allocated resources, just returning -EAGAIN everywhere, and no checking for already allocated resources.

Someone with too much time on their hands[1] could probably clean this up to free allocated resources on failure and return -ENOMEM on allocation failures.

Yup, but I do not have that much spare time ;)
I just looked at the code for two seconds and thought that I'd send a quick fix for it.

Regards

Petter Wahlman